Top critical review
2 people found this helpful
I should have abandoned the book after reading the very first line...
on 18 May 2016
I purchased this title as part of a research assignment for a college history assignment. One can never read too much history, right? Wrong...
I found this book very weak and extremely biased. Phrases like 'Arguably many Rebels like Pearse, Childers, Connolly and Griffith had as much English [...] blood in their veins as many Unionists had Irish.' and 'the protagonists on either side were mostly Irish' are irrelevant, offensive and have no references showing their basis. There is also an opaque view of the executed leaders of 1916, when the author says 'Although the executions that followed the Easter Rising were perfectly legal they damaged British standing and created a new crop of martyrs for the cause'. The author may call these executions 'legal' but dues not elude to the fact that these men were 'prisoners of war', and as such, should have been imprisoned, not shot en-masse.
I should have abandoned the book after reading the very first line: 'It is likely that many people have never heard of the Anglo-Irish War.'
Seriously??? Did he mean Irish people, English people? Americans? I think he may be underestimating a vast percentage of Europe.
Should you want to read an Englishman's view of another of England's colonies, go for it. Should you want a balanced, non- biased look at the relationship between Ireland and England, buy a decent book, like Charles Townshend's 'The Republic' or go online and read witness statements on [...]