- Paperback: 516 pages
- Publisher: Oxford University Press, USA (30 April 2012)
- Language: English
- ISBN-10: 0199646481
- ISBN-13: 978-0199646487
- Product Dimensions: 24.1 x 2.5 x 17 cm
- Amazon Bestsellers Rank: 1,247,942 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- See Complete Table of Contents
Targeted Killings: Law and Morality in an Asymmetrical World Paperback – 30 Apr 2012
- Choose from over 13,000 locations across the UK
- Prime members get unlimited deliveries at no additional cost
- Find your preferred location and add it to your address book
- Dispatch to this address when you check out
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
We are entering a new era in which targeted killing will be the preferred method of fighting enemies in a great many contexts. In terms of geographical reach, targeting precision, the manageability of the intervention, and the minimization of the cost and casualties, the practice is hugely attractive to militaries and politicians alike. But it also comes with potentially grave costs in terms of respect for basic moral principles, as well as established human rights and international humanitarian law. This book provides the best possible panorama of diverse and competing perspectives on emerging practices and will be an invaluable guide to those shaping future policies in this area. (Philip Alston John Norton Pomeroy Professor of Law, New York University)
The debate over targeted killings has become the most contentious in the contemporary law and morality of war. Is it a legitimate tactic that saves lives compared with old-fashioned bombing campaigns? Or is it ruthless execution by non-uniformed spies piloting science-fiction drones from the safety of a distant control room? May states kill if capture is possible? May they kill their own citizens? What rights do the targets have? Is there a moral difference between killing anonymous enemies and killing men and women whose names you know? The law is ambiguous, and the moral issues cloudy. This volume is the most useful and thought-provoking discussion available, with a stellar group of authors who delve deep. (David Luban University Professor in Law and Philosophy Georgetown University)
About the Author
Claire Finkelstein is the Algernon Biddle Professor of Law and Professor of Philosophy at the University of Pennsylvania, and a co-Director of Penn's Institute for Law and Philosophy. She writes in the areas of criminal law theory, moral and political philosophy, philosophy of law, international law, and rational choice theory. A particular focus of her work is bringing philosophical rational choice theory to bear on legal theory, and she is particularly interested in tracing the implications of Hobbes' political theory for substantive legal questions. Recently she has also been writing on the moral and legal aspects of government-sponsored torture as part of the U.S. national security program. In 2008 Finkelstein was a Siemens Fellow at the American Academy in Berlin, during which time she presented papers in Berlin, Leipzig, and Heidelberg. She is currently working on her book, Contractarian Legal Theory, and is the editor of Hobbes on Law (Ashgate, 2005).
Jens Ohlin's research and teaching interests are focused on criminal law theory, public international law, and international criminal law. He is the author, with George Fletcher, of Defending Humanity: When Force is Justified and Why (Oxford University Press, 2008), which offers a new account of international self-defense through a comparative analysis of the rules of self-defense in criminal law. His scholarly work has appeared in top law reviews and journals, including the Columbia Law Review, Cornell Law Review, Harvard International Law Journal, American Journal of International Law, and several OUP edited volumes. His current research focuses on the normative application of criminal law concepts in international criminal law, especially with regard to genocide, torture, joint criminal enterprise and co-perpetration, as well as the philosophical foundations of collective criminal action.
Andrew Altman is Professor of Philosophy at Georgia State University and Director of Research of the Jean Beer Blumenfeld Center for Ethics.
Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta)
Also, it is really a legal philosophical/discussion of aspects of asymmetrical warfare--one side has or uses weapons the other doesn't. (For example, drones vs no drones.)
Summary: too complicated for the average intelligent reader, too obtuse in the way that academic law and philosophy can be, and several authors explicitly try to create a space for the justification of using drones to kill people. Hence -2.0 out of 2.5 as a text for the interested "laywoman".
It is a very interesting academic and interesting read if you are a person who might find the topic interesting. I gave the academic perspective on the book a 2.0. I took off 0.2 because the essays could have been made less complex. I took off 0.3 because there is a clear bias in several essays.
My total numeric assessment is 2.5 so I rounded up.