Currently unavailable.
We don't know when or if this item will be back in stock.

Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon

Swift Cookie Cutter Numbers Set

4.4 out of 5 stars 25 customer reviews

Currently unavailable.
We don't know when or if this item will be back in stock.

 get baking  get baking

Currently unavailable. We don't know when or if this item will be back in stock.

Special Offers and Product Promotions


Product Information

Technical Details
Brand Swift Collection
Model Number17848891
ColourSilver
Item Weight181 g
Product Dimensions17.6 x 14.6 x 2.8 cm
Materialtinplate
  
Additional Information
ASINB0000BVFS7
Best Sellers Rank 328,667 in Kitchen & Home (See top 100)
Shipping Weight181 g
Delivery Destinations:Visit the Delivery Destinations Help page to see where this item can be delivered.
Date First Available15 Aug. 2003
  
 


Customer Questions & Answers

Customer Reviews

4.4 out of 5 stars
Share your thoughts with other customers

Top Customer Reviews

Verified Purchase
The cutters are a good size for tiny hands, She children at school love to use them. small downside I have to keep checking that the small circle cutters that make the hole in the numbers 6,8 and 9 have been packed away with the cutters. As the children don't view them as part of the numbers. Small price to pay for good resources.
Comment 2 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Verified Purchase
Bought these to cut flowerpaste with and wasn't disappointed. They cut really well and leave no jaggy bits at the side like other cutters. Have seen reviews for other number cutters having trouble distinguishing between the 2 and 5 - I bought these for a 25th anniversary cake and had no problems with the numbers.
Comment 2 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Have only used the number 2 so far but it did a good job. Good size and decent quality. Would recommend.
Comment 7 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Verified Purchase
Good product My 3 year old can use so very good in terms of size.
Comment 4 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
By B. Seed on 16 Sept. 2011
Verified Purchase
This product is ok, but that's as far as it goes. The number 3 and number 5 are not so great in terms of shape, but you can fiddle with them to make them better. Having said that, the numbers are easy to use and a nice 'inbetween' sort of size useful for birthday cakes.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Verified Purchase
Did exactly what they should- cut clearly and cleanly. Only comment is that the number 2 and 5 are very very similar and very difficult to tell apart making it hard for children learning their numerals to tell apart if not placed completely up the right way.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
I really like these products they are a good size I like the font of the numbers and they are good quality for money
Comment 2 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Verified Purchase
Brilliant - produce clean cut and good medium size. I use these for sugar craft so the need to be precise.
Comment 2 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse