These promotions will be applied to this item:
Some promotions may be combined; others are not eligible to be combined with other offers. For details, please see the Terms & Conditions associated with these promotions.
Your Memberships and Subscriptions
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet or computer – no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
State and Local Economic Sanctions: Constitutional Issues Kindle Edition
Due to the troubled situation in Darfur, a number of states have proposed or enacted some type of divestment legislation against Sudan. States have also considered or adopted divestment legislation involving Iran and terrorist states in general. In February 2007, a federal district court held Illinois’s Sudan sanctions law unconstitutional and permanently enjoined its enforcement (National Foreign Trade Council v. Giannoulias). Illinois subsequently repealed its statute, and the state’s appeal in the case was dismissed as moot in November 2007.
Congress considered and enacted legislation in the 110th and 111th Congresses to authorize states to divest assets involving Sudan and Iran. The Sudan Accountability and Divestment Act of 2007, P.L. 110-174, enacted into law December 31, 2007, authorizes states and local governments to adopt divestment measures involving (1) federally identified persons with investments and business in the Sudanese energy and military equipment sectors or (2) persons having a direct investment in or carrying on a trade or business with Sudan or the Government of Sudan, provided certain notification requirements are met. The Comprehensive Iran Sanctions, Accountability, and Divestment Act, P.L. 111-95, enacted into law on July 1, 2010, includes provisions authorizing state and local governments to divest from businesses making investments of $20 million or more in Iran’s energy sector after adequate investigation and notification have occurred. Both laws provide that a measure falling within the scope of the authorization is not preempted by any federal law or regulation.
- LanguageEnglish
- Publication date15 July 2011
- File size129 KB
Product details
- ASIN : B005GEX8RM
- Publisher : Congressional Research Service
- Accessibility : Learn more
- Publication date : 15 July 2011
- Language : English
- File size : 129 KB
- Simultaneous device usage : Unlimited
- Screen Reader : Supported
- Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
- X-Ray : Not Enabled
- Word Wise : Enabled
- Page Flip : Enabled
Customer reviews
- 5 star4 star3 star2 star1 star5 star0%0%0%0%0%0%
- 5 star4 star3 star2 star1 star4 star0%0%0%0%0%0%
- 5 star4 star3 star2 star1 star3 star0%0%0%0%0%0%
- 5 star4 star3 star2 star1 star2 star0%0%0%0%0%0%
- 5 star4 star3 star2 star1 star1 star0%0%0%0%0%0%
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings, help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyses reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon