- Amazon Students Members Get an Extra 10% Off Selected Books Here's how (terms and conditions apply)
Star Wars (BFI Film Classics) Paperback – 28 Jul 2009
Save an extra 10% with Amazon Student*
|New from||Used from|
- Choose from over 13,000 locations across the UK
- Prime members get unlimited deliveries at no additional cost
- Find your preferred location and add it to your address book
- Dispatch to this address when you check out
Special Offers and Product Promotions
Frequently Bought Together
Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
'Another day, another Star Wars book, but this one does a rare thing — concentrate on the film itself rather than its mythos. There's thoughtful stuff, suggesting SW continues Lucas' development as an experimental filmmaker and arguing that Lucas is rooting for both Empire and rebellion.' - Empire
'For once, a scholarly study that doesn't tut and moan about merchandising and the death of New Hollywood... Its clear, concise arguments include a taut dismissal of the prequels that doesn't resort to Binks-bashing.' - Total Film
A study of George Lucas's science fiction blockbuster Star Wars (1977) in the BFI Film Classics seriesSee all Product Description
What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?
Top Customer Reviews
The book looks at the film in terms of George Lucas as an auteur, particularly focussing on him regarding himself as being an experimental, solitary filmmaker (despite working within the Hollywood system) and examining the film within the context of both his early experimental work and his latter mainstream work. It also examines the editing and composition of shots in the film and how they were influenced by many classic works in the cinema, appropriating many of its shots tooth and nail from earlier classic films like The Searchers and 633 Squadron - one interesting point is that the Death Star sequence was derived from a montage of old war movie dogfights which Lucas edited together to show what he wanted.
Its an interesting read and it is likely that both the fan and the serious student of film will learn something new from this book.
This is the one part of the book which has stuck in my mind more than any other. It's a very entertaining read and if you love the film - or the original trilogy - you should definitely read it.
Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta)
The first chapter provides a quick review of George Lucas' early works, both his short student films and the full-length THX 1138 and American Graffiti. Lucas always saw himself as becoming an experimental film maker and/or maker of documentaries. Star Wars seems to have been a significant turn off the rails. But as Brooker points out, this may not necessarily have been the case. Star Wars actually combines the previous two movies, with the sci-fi coldness of THX 1138 and the optimistic humanity and youthfulness of American Graffiti, and adds a third element to it: a coherent, linear story to purposefully create a mythos for a society that needed them.
The remainder of the book is a fascinating examination of the relationship between the two seemingly opposite environments in the film: the creative, messy, earthy and human world primarily associated with the Rebel Alliance versus the disciplined, mechanical, orderly and linear world of the Empire. Brooker does an excellent job of demonstrating that this dichotomy, prevalent throughout much of the film, is not as exclusive to each side as first appears and, indeed, it is the crossing of the boundaries between these two worlds that ultimately leads to the Death Star's (and in later films, the Empire's) destruction.
Some of this is behavioral, such as Han Solo, the personification of the disorderly and messy, running havoc against Imperial Soldiers and, in the rescue scene, displaying a total inability to adopt the language of the Empire. Some of this is intrinsic to the characters, such as Princess Leia, whose disciplined manners are more parallel to the orderly world of the Death Star but whose very presence aboard that vehicle ultimately leads to its destruction. Or C-3PO, who was created on Tatooine (as we learn in the prequels but whose own memory of such has been wiped clean) and whose appearance was designed to reflect that desert planet's appearance, but whose punctilious manner is totally out of place there (remember, Uncle Owen, when buying droids from the Jawas, initially rejected C-3PO because he had no need for a protocol droid).
Further, as Brooker demonstrates, this conflict between warm humanity and the cold mechanical, is a reflection of the actual film maker himself. George Lucas wanted to create a movie with warmth and humanity, but Lucas the man is far more comfortable with things than with people. He disliked the actual process of making the film, wanted only to get the pictures in his head on to film but, of course, had to go through the messy (human) process of actually making the movie to do so. The boundaries of the two sides were at odds within Lucas as they were between the two sides in the movie.
Finally, this dichotomy is shown to work the other way, as well. The final scene, with the heroes receiving military medals, displays a strict code and formality more akin to the disciplined Empire than the chaotic Rebel Alliance. And this, as Booker points out, brings us full circle. As the prequels demonstrate, the Empire did not arise outside of the former Republic, but within it. The Republic failed to see it coming because the Empire reflected the Republic's own mannerisms and customs. In the end, the two sides are not as far apart as they would seem in this, the fourth chapter but initial film, in the series.
Brooker intended to bring a more serious analytic eye to Star Wars. In that, he succeeded. This is a very interesting book.
And, indeed, Star Wars is a worthy addition to a very limited field of books and essays that critically look at the Star Wars films from an independent perspective, and not that simply of a fanboy or that of a Star Wars affiliate like [...] or a franchise like Lucasbooks or Wizards of the Coast. Brooker is not only a respected professor in popular culture, but also fan of those other popular expressions that inform modern adventure films. Things like comics, radio serials, television, as well as art, literature, and cinema. And behind him stands the British Film Institute and the proper vetting and rigor that is required for the inclusion of another addition to the BFI film classics series.
Brooker's monograph looks at the original film with a particular look at George Lucas the avant-garde filmmaker and the influences that inform the rebel versus empire theme within the first movie. Unlike the many interviews Lucas has given over several decades, Lucas cannot re-interprete the influences on him and the original film. Instead, Booker looks at the visual influences on Star Wars and the pretensions of Lucas as a director and editor pre-Episode IV. His supporting evidence is so good that it even impresses the many die-hard fans that are quite familiar with the body of Lucas interviews and early critical reviews of the film.
Those that are looking for a more comprehensive look at this film are directed to Rinzler's The Making of Star Wars: The Definitive Story Behind the Original Film, but for those who want a critical look from a particular perspective, as true academic criticism is supposed to, then researchers and Star Wars lovers alike should pick up Brooker's book and add it to their library.
For those who see Star Wars as simply black & white, Brooker's essay is required reading for commentary on the "gray" of the film which not only makes Star Wars a little more critically understood and not simply a modern fairy tale, but the "gray" which explains intellectually the raw feelings that make its fans love the very movie itself.