- Hardcover: 320 pages
- Publisher: Lewis Masonic; Slp edition (22 Feb. 2007)
- Language: English
- ISBN-10: 0853182566
- ISBN-13: 978-0853182566
- Product Dimensions: 15.9 x 3.2 x 23.5 cm
- Average Customer Review: 3.8 out of 5 stars See all reviews (4 customer reviews)
- Amazon Bestsellers Rank: 933,646 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
The Secret of Solomon's Temple Hardcover – 22 Feb 2007
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
If you are a seller for this product, would you like to suggest updates through seller support?
About the Author
Kevin L. Gest is a writer, Freemason, and former engineer who spent 12 years researching the hidden mysteries of Solomon's temple. Kevin lives in East Sussex, United Kingdom --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.
Top Customer Reviews
This book is an interesting, well written description of the mysteries surrounding the Temple of King Solomons temple.
It covers the history of Masonry, from the operative lodges of the middle ages to the modern lodge as we know it today.
Overall this is an excellent, well written book. It would be a great addition to any brother's Masonic library, or a book for the curious folk wanting to learn more about the great institution of Freemasonry and king Solomons Temple.
The explanation of the inner and exterior are all explained in cubic measurement.
Unknown facts come to the fore that appear in the Bible , but one overlooks, for example Solomons name , was it as such, no and I refer you to 2 Samuel 12v25 to those wishing to investigate.
Further the name of Solomon was only associated with him after the completion of the temple which was erected in honour of tthe two spheres.
Sol means sun and mon means moon, that the temple was built in there honour.
The information why catherals and the temples are built facing the east, and this can be explained, as the sun arose it rays shone into the Holy of Holies, and with the two cherubins with outstretched wings therein lit up with a bright light.Same with Catherals sun shining on the alter.
There much more interesting facts to discover.
The sacred geometry is limited and most probably censored. There is secret information in Freemasonry temples but is not found in this book. The information about Solomon's Temple is also limited.
The facts about the two pillars:Boaz and Jaichin is quite fascinating though.
But the information about child sacrifice is downright wrong-this act of abomination was not committed in this temple and I have secret information that if that particular act was carried out, Israel would have fallen much, much sooner, God would have made sure of that.
It does make me wonder, is this book going to be used to condone sacrificing a child in the next Jewish Temple? I hope not.
I wonder where the author got his evidence for the child sacrificing? If he says the Bible, Abraham didn't actually carry out the act because GOD STOPPED HIM.
I know the Truth and this book doesn't come close.
Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta) (May include reviews from Early Reviewer Rewards Program)
I am currently preparing to write a book which I have tentatively titled 'Freemasony: The Australian Prehistory Enigma'.
Like yourself Kevin, I have commenced my journey with pieces of a very challenging jigsaw puzzle - in my case I am starting out with extraordinary, and very ancient, stone artifacts which I have found 'downunder'.
My task is to make a case for what these ancient artifacts might mean to our understanding of the civilised devolopment of mankind and, I have little doubt, the origins of 'the secret knowledge'.
Kevin, your wonderful book, 'The Secrets of Solomon's Temple', and the way you have put yourself on the record, gives me great strength of purpose to deal with the enormouse challenge that lies ahead for me.
If circumstances permit, I would much value meeting with you and discussing with you the import of what I have in front of me.
In Particular, and the mathematics notwithstanding, Gest alleges that King Solomon by name did not exist. Instead it was a "King Jedidiah" that built Solomons temple. Complete hogwash as I shall demonstrate
Gests hypothesis: SOLOMONS TEMPLE DEDICATED TO THE ROMAN SUN GOD SOL + THE EGYPTIAN MOON GOD AMON. HENCE SOL AMON = SOLOMON
Gests hypothesis is that the temple of Solomon was actually dedicated to the pagan worship of the sun god named SOL and the moon god named AMUN (AMON) hence SOL -AMON. SOL being the Roman Sun god and Amon was the supreme Egyptian god whom Gest misguidedly refers to as the moon god (a minor deity).
Gest alleges that someone called "King Jedediah", became known by the name of SOLOMON by his association with the Temple that he allegedly built to the Sun and the Moon! SOL - AMON, and then everyone somehow forgot his real name (Jedidiah)and he was therefater called SOLOMON. So according to Gest there was no actual King Solomon by that name!
Without delving into the Biblical "inaccuracy" postulated by Gest that the Israelite's did not know or record the real name of their own beloved king Solomon the son of king David, consider these facts.
1. King Solomon reigned approximately 967 BC
2. Rome was founded as a small village in Central Italy in about 753 BC. It took hundreds of years for Rome to become a power even in its own back yard.
3. Rome Conquered Israel (Judea) in 63BC
4. Therefore Solomon ruled 200 years BEFORE Rome existed as a small settlement in Italy and Solomon ruled 900 years before the Roman conquest of Israel nearly a millennium later.
This is an important fact. It would have been impossible to name the Temple SOL - AMON given that:
1. SOL was a Roman god. This would assume that the Temple was named after a Roman god BEFORE the very existence of Rome itself.
2. Amon (Amun) was NOT the moon god of the Egyptians as Gest alleges.
3. The moon god of the Egyptians is named Khonsu a relatively minor deity. In Egyptian mythology Khonsu is the son of Amun, the Supreme god, and the mother goddess Mut.
4. Amon was therefore the supreme god of the Egyptians and he is not to confused with his son, the moon god, Khonsu.
It is inconceivable that the ancient Israelite's - or anyone else at that time - would co-mingle two deities (Representing the SUN and the MOON) from two different cultures to refer to a Hebrew temple. One deity for the sun god SOL who did not even exist at that time, and the other deity, AMUN who was not the moon deity.
And following on this false assumption Gest proceeds to juxtapose that odd name, SOL-AMUN on the King of Israel who was the most famous King of all time for the Hebrews!
One must consider that even if the Temple was a temple dedicated to the sun and the moon, that the god Amon was NOT the moon god!
Gests own hypothesis, that the name SOLOMON is a blend of Sun and Moon, is completely destroyed by the fact that Amon is not the moon god, Khonsu is.
If Gest were to be true to his hypothesis, the Temple would be called the Temple of SOL - KHONSU.
Sol - Khonsu however, cannot be related back to the name "SOL - AMON" (SOLOMON). Gest wants to prove that the temple was dedicated to SOL AMUN which in turn lent its name to King SOLOMON.
The name SOL- KHONSU would blow his entire hypothesis out of the water. But that is what it would need to be, if Gest was reporting accurately.
That the Temple is dedicated to the sun and the moon and that King Solomon did not exit simply is fabricated.
This minor fact is a square peg in a round hole that Gest overlooks.
Gest does not let facts stand in his way.
The fact of the mis-named deities is conveniently overlooked by Gest, to further his unworkable hypothesis.
Many a reader perhaps may not immediately realize this fakery.
What else if faked?
WHAT WAS SOLOMONS REAL NAME?
It is well known that Jesus Christ was NOT Jesus' real name, he was Yoshua, a very common Hebrew name. That is his real name. Jesus is a Greek modification as is the addition of Kristos or Christ.
Anyone in Jesus time would have had no idea who Jesus Christ was. Jesus Christ is not Hebrew and they are not Hebrew words.
Mashiach is the Hebrew word for Messiah. So the Hebrew name of Jesus would in his time have been Yoshua ben Yosef (Joshua son of Joseph).
There were literally thousands of people with the name Yoshua ben Yosef. That name is like John Smith in our culture.
So you might want to be more specific by saying his profession - the carpenter from Bethlehem or some such further means of distinction.
If you wanted to append a description to his name, although there is no evidence that this was used in his lifetime, one might have referred to Jesus as Yoshua ben Yosef Ha'Moshiach - Joshua, son of Josph, the Messiah.
That being said, how would the ancient Hebrews have referred to King Solomon?
Most certainly by his HEBREW name. Shlomo ben David Ha'Melech.
The real name of Solomon is SHLOMO son of David, the king. Or simply Shlomo Ha' Melech which is King Solomon.
The Hebrew Bible has NEVER used the name of SOLOMON or SOL -AMON anywhere. Such a name does not exist in the Bible nor was used by the Hebrews.
Indeed the Israelites did not call it SHOLOMO'S temple either.
King Solomons name was never attached to the Temple! Even today Hebrew speaking people do not call it Solomons Temple.
The true Hebrew name for the Temple is Beit Ha'Mikdash (Beit = House, Ha = the, and Mikdash = Sanctification) or "The Sanctified House"
It is indeed impossible for the Temple or King SHLOMO to ever have been referred to as SOLOMON and Solomons Temple.
Therefore given this very glaring error in the premise of the book, once must clearly question what other "facts" have been bent to fit Gests hypothesis?