FREE Delivery in the UK.
Temporarily out of stock.
Order now and we'll deliver when available. We'll e-mail you with an estimated delivery date as soon as we have more information. Your account will only be charged when we dispatch the item.
Dispatched from and sold by Amazon. Gift-wrap available.
Scripture Alone, The Evan... has been added to your Basket
+ £2.80 UK delivery
Used: Like New | Details
Sold by Wordery
Condition: Used: Like New
Comment: This fine as new copy should be with you within 6-9 working days via Royal Mail.
Have one to sell?
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

Scripture Alone, The Evangelical Doctrine (R. C. Sproul Library) Hardcover – 5 Jul 2012

See all formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price
New from Used from
"Please retry"
£6.37 £6.87
Note: This item is eligible for click and collect. Details
Pick up your parcel at a time and place that suits you.
  • Choose from over 13,000 locations across the UK
  • Prime members get unlimited deliveries at no additional cost
How to order to an Amazon Pickup Location?
  1. Find your preferred location and add it to your address book
  2. Dispatch to this address when you check out
Learn more
£12.99 FREE Delivery in the UK. Temporarily out of stock. Order now and we'll deliver when available. We'll e-mail you with an estimated delivery date as soon as we have more information. Your account will only be charged when we dispatch the item. Dispatched from and sold by Amazon. Gift-wrap available.
click to open popover

Special Offers and Product Promotions

Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.

  • Apple
  • Android
  • Windows Phone

To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.

Product details

What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?

Customer Reviews

There are no customer reviews yet on
5 star
4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star

Most Helpful Customer Reviews on (beta) 3.4 out of 5 stars 7 reviews
18 of 20 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars Scripture Alone 5 Sept. 2005
By AK - Published on
Format: Hardcover
**** Is the Bible trustworthy? That has been an issue for many years, but issues such as the increasingly hot debates over creation vs. Darwinianism, or whether or not recent bestsellers have any validity have made it more important to be sure that the Bible is what it claims, the word of God. In a scholarly, yet conversational style, this book examines why it is important to know where you stand on that point of doctrine and why the Bible can be trusted. The explanation of complex terms and the historical background of the debate will broaden readers' acumen in multiple ways. Granted, it is not light reading, but it is worth your time. ****

Reviewed by Amanda Killgore, Freelance Reviewer.
7 of 7 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars A convincing case for the total inerrancy of Scripture. 21 Nov. 2007
By Kyle A. Dillon - Published on
Format: Hardcover Verified Purchase
Before I read this book, I had my doubts about the Evangelical doctrine of scriptural inerrancy. It seemed hard for me to affirm it in the face of so many difficult passages and apparent errors and contradictions in the Bible. But Sproul has done an excellent job defending this central Christian belief. He examines the alternatives--such as "limited" inerrancy and the Neo-orthodox view that the Bible "becomes" the Word of God through the individual's encounter--and shows where they fall short. He also explains exactly what is meant by the word "inerrancy," pointing out that it does not necessarily require a particular interpretation of Scripture (e.g., young-earth creationism, dispensationalism, etc.). He admits that there are difficult passages in the Bible (though not as many as the critics would have us think), but recent scholarship has resolved many of them, and future insights may resolve even more. Finally, he also emphasizes that, although belief in the inerrancy of Scripture is very important to a sound theology, it is not necessary for salvation.

This book also contains the full text of the 1978 Chicago Statement on Biblical Inerrancy, with explanations of each article. I would highly recommend it to any Christian (or non-Christian) who wishes to better understand the Protestant teaching of Sola Scriptura.
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Inerrancy - Corollary of Inspiration, Foundation of Authority 1 Dec. 2015
By Randy A. Stadt - Published on
Format: Hardcover
‘Scripture Alone’ is a collection of writings by R.C. Sproul, written to deal with one of the most controversial issues and important questions that the Church faces in our day, that being the question of the nature and the authority of Scripture. A shadow of doubt has been cast upon the reliability and trustworthiness of the Bible, and it finds its origin in the denial of inerrancy.

Denials of Biblical inerrancy are nothing new. Liberals have for centuries asserted that the Bible is merely the product of human beings who wrote their thoughts about God, and therefore as a matter of course it contains errors. But what precipitated the contents of this book is the relatively recent movement within Evangelicalism itself which would, unlike liberalism, still claim divine inspiration of the Bible, but concede the presence of errors in Scripture.

These individuals, many of them scholars and seminary professors, might claim the term “limited inerrancy” for their position. And the way one of its advocates explained it to me, on the surface it actually sounds reasonable: “God has so worked with sinful human beings, the authors of Scripture, that in spite of the mistakes that they made, his message of salvation gets through.”

One strength of this book is that it shows that this position is reasonable only at the surface and cannot stand up to scrutiny and logical analysis. Dr. Sproul relates how on numerous occasions he has had the following dialogue with biblical scholars who hold to this position. And he assures us that he is not making this up, but what follows is a verbatim reproduction of what transpires:

“Do you maintain the inerrancy of Scripture?” – “No.”
“Do you believe the Bible to be the inspired Word of God?” – “Yes.”
“Do you think God inspires error?” – “No.”
“Is all of the Bible inspired by God?” – “Yes.”
“Is the Bible errant?” – “No!”
“Is it inerrant?” – “No!”

At this point, Sproul says, he gets an Excedrin headache. The fallacious nature of so-called “limited inerrancy” is exposed here because there is no tertium quid between errancy and inerrancy. Inerrancy is a category that incorporates everything outside of the category of errancy. To affirm or deny both categories is to be involved in a logical absurdity.

Sproul rightly and forcefully concludes: “Unless we want to join the ranks of the absurd, or unless we confess that God inspires error and join the ranks of the impious, or unless we confess that the Bible as a whole is not inspired, then we are forced by what Martin Luther called “resistless logic” to the conclusion that the Bible is inerrant.”

The issue of the autographs, or original manuscripts of the biblical books, is one reason some Evangelicals reject inerrancy. Because inerrancy is claimed only for the autographs and not for subsequent copies, and since we do not have any of the autographs any more, critics charge that the claim of inerrancy is empty, being neither verifiable nor falsifiable.

But, Sproul counters, it’s important to realize that the argument is not really about texts that we don’t have, but about texts that at one point in time did indeed exist. The real question is, were those original documents inspired by God or weren’t they?

In other words, to limit inerrancy or inspiration to the original manuscripts does not make the whole contention irrelevant. It does make a difference. If the original texts were errant, the church would have the option of rejecting the teachings of that errant text. If the original text is inerrant, we have no legitimate basis for disobeying a mandate of Scripture where the text is not in doubt.

Biblical inerrancy affirms that copies and translations of Scripture are the Word of God to the extent that they faithfully represent the original. The one who finds such a claim to be empty simply needs to educate himself on the science of textual criticism, the discipline which seeks to reconstruct the original based on the examination of the existing manuscripts. The fact is that about 99 percent of the original can be reconstructed to a virtual certainty, and where there is some doubt in the remaining 1 percent of the text, no doctrine of the Christian faith hangs in the balance.

So it is fair to say that though we don’t literally have the originals, we do, practically. For all intents and purposes we can reconstruct what was in the original.

Nobody is denying that there remain some Bible difficulties that have not yet been resolved. These have been known for centuries, even millennia. And in knowing how to proceed we might note that a parallel exists with the discipline of science. In science, you don’t throw out a paradigm due to the existence of a few anomalies that are not easily explainable by the paradigm. The same thing is true when dealing with the problem of Bible difficulties. You don’t just look at the particulars of unresolved problems, but you also look at the trend.

A century or so ago at the height of liberal hubris regarding the errancy of the Bible, there were maybe 100 difficulties that at the time were regarded as errors. But that list has been pared down to a handful of apparent discrepancies. At this point in the investigation, you don’t take the handful of unresolved difficulties and say, uh oh, we can throw the Bible out, when everything indicates greater confidence in the paradigm than what we had before.

Next, we should note that despite the knowledge of Bible difficulties, the church, historically, has affirmed inerrancy. True, the word “inerrancy” was not used until the seventeenth century. But the concept underlying the word has always been there. And the underlying concept is an affirmation of the complete truthfulness and trustworthiness of Scripture, that we can in fact trust our Bible.

The Protestant Reformation itself, though it did not use the word “inerrancy,” was built upon that concept. Sola Scriptura, the claim that Scripture alone is the supreme normative authority in matters of religion, was called the “formal cause” of the Reformation. Martin Luther argued that whereas both popes and church councils could and have erred, Scripture does not err. For Luther the sola of sola Scriptura was inseparably related to the Scriptures’ unique inerrancy. Sola Scriptura as the supreme norm of ecclesiastical authority rests ultimately on the premise of the inerrancy of the Word of God. So though the word is of somewhat recent vintage in church history, it is false to say that the concept of inerrancy itself also is recent, and that it is the product of a reified seventeenth-century Protestant scholasticism.

Finally, the folks who hold to “limited inerrancy” really face an insurmountable problem. They think that it is okay to concede that the Bible has errors in it but these errors are limited to insignificant matters of science and history, while the important matters of salvation and theology remain inerrant. Why would they believe that? The Bible certainly doesn’t teach that. You are left with nothing other than sheer subjectivism if you have to decide where the Bible is telling the truth and where it is mistaken. And such an approach completely strips the Bible of any authority over our lives.

No, our approach to Scripture should be nothing less than that held by Jesus himself. And even liberal scholars concede that Jesus’ view of Scripture was essentially that of modern day advocates of inerrancy. Liberals just flat out say that Jesus was wrong in his view. And Evangelicals who are essentially saying the same thing need to face up to Jesus’ words when he said, “how can you believe me concerning heavenly things if you will not believe me concerning earthly things?”

Talk about straining out a gnat and swallowing a camel. At least the advocate of inerrancy will swat at a few gnats by rolling up his sleeves and struggling, methodically and painstakingly, using the tools of textual criticism, archaeology, ancient languages, and the like, to make progress in this endeavor. The critics don’t do any of that heavy lifting but just declare that the Bible has errors in it. They want to eat their cake and have it too. They strain out the gnat, that is, problems in the Bible, and swallow the camel, because they still want to say they believe the message of the Bible regarding the deity of Christ and salvation, when their only basis for believing that is their subjective and existential decision to believe it. If I cannot believe the Bible where it is testable, why in the world would I believe it where it is not?

Inerrancy is not something to be held because it is the product of a misguided Enlightenment search for absolute certainty. No, inerrancy is something to be held because it is inextricably bound together with Biblical inspiration, trustworthiness, and authority. It is the position of the Protestant Reformation and the historic Church prior to that, and to deny inerrancy is to deny sola Scriptura and to remove oneself from under the authority of Scripture.
1 of 2 people found the following review helpful
3.0 out of 5 stars Good, not great 16 July 2008
By Jennifer Spinner - Published on
Format: Hardcover
I bought this shrink-wrapped from a local book store. Had I been able to flip through, I probably would have passed it by. As Clem says in his review, this collection of Dr. Sproul's writings is not an apologetic of the doctrine of Sola Scriptura, but rather "more about integrating the concept theologically within the overall reformed structure." I agree 100% with this assessment.

The writing is - as always - superb. Dr. Sproul is a learned and intelligent man and it certainly shows! I did find this book to be a bit of a disappointment, however, solely because I expected something different.

So-so. If you can get it used or from the library, do so!
4 of 7 people found the following review helpful
3.0 out of 5 stars As good as it gets? 15 May 2008
By Stratiotes Doxha Theon - Published on
Format: Hardcover
Concerning a Protestant defense of the doctrine of scripture alone, this is as good as it gets. Dr. Sproul is a favorite theologian of mine but I must say this is one of his least convincing works. Ironically, a former acolyte of Dr. Sproul's does a much better job of a biblical defense for Sola Scriptura in his first lecture of the course, The Bible Alone. Dr. Hahn's course is far more convincing in the first lecture than Dr. Sproul's book or any other work I have read on the topic. But, be forewarned, Dr. Hahn proceeds in those lectures to demonstrate how even his most biblically based of all cases is full of problems. The wise student would do well to compare this with Dr. Hahn's lectures for a better understanding of this topic.

Dr. Sproul's fellow evangelicals like Dr. D. H. Willams and Dr. Craig Allert would also have issues with Dr. Sproul's work. See either Tradition, Scripture, and Interpretation: A Sourcebook of the Ancient Church (Evangelical Ressourcement: Ancient Sources for the Church's Future) or A High View of Scripture? The Authority of the Bible and the Formation of the New Testament Canon (Evangelical Ressourcement: Ancient Sources for the Church's Future).

Scripture alone, as a principle, also touches on the issue of the duetero-canonical books. After all, if our sole guide is scripture then we had better find out what scripture consists of. God did not give us an inspired table of contents for the canon. See more on this in Why Catholic Bibles Are Bigger: The Untold Story of the Lost Books of the Protestant Bible. Readers may also wish to round their education by way of Mark Shea's little book on the topic, By What Authority?: An Evangelical Discovers Catholic Tradition.

This is an important topic not to be taken lightly. It is important to make a decision in this matter and Dr. Sproul is right to offer the reformed position to the marketplace of ideas. Read what Dr. Sproul has to say but do not stop there. Study to show yourself approved (2 Tim 2:15).
Were these reviews helpful? Let us know