Buy new:
£16.89£16.89
FREE Delivery
Buy used £10.46
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet or computer – no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Scorpions: The Battles and Triumphs of FDR's Great Supreme Court Justices Hardcover – 20 Jan. 2011
| Amazon Price | New from | Used from |
|
Kindle Edition
"Please retry" | — | — |
|
Audible Audiobooks, Unabridged
"Please retry" |
£0.00
| Free with your Audible trial | |
|
Paperback, Illustrated
"Please retry" | £14.24 | £8.47 |
Purchase options and add-ons
Unprecedented in its global impact, the Great Depression sounded the death knell of unfettered capitalism. Four men - all from wildly different backgrounds, all with decidedly disparate temperments and all equally devoted to FDR - were the primary authors of what would essentially be America's new Constitution. Scorpions is the story of their personalities, their relationships and above all their ideas in the crucial years of depression and war - years in which these men created the national game plan that would save the country by rebuilding the economy and defeating the Nazis and the Soviets in turn.
It is also the story of how these men - Felix Frankfurter, Hugo Black, Robert Jackson and William O. Douglas (a Jew, a Klansman, a Yankee, and a Westerner) - advised, cajoled, used and were used by the man who brought them together and whom they all revered: President Franklin Delano Roosevelt.
- Print length512 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherTwelve
- Publication date20 Jan. 2011
- Dimensions17.78 x 5.08 x 24.13 cm
- ISBN-100446580570
- ISBN-13978-0446580571
Popular titles by this author
Product description
Review
In SCORPIONS, Noah Feldman offers a detailed account of the troubles and achievements of Roosevelt's four most notable appointees. A first-rate work of narrative history that succeeds in bringing the intellectual and political battles of the post-Rooseve (PUBLISHERS WEEKLY)
Book Description
About the Author
Product details
- Publisher : Twelve (20 Jan. 2011)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 512 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0446580570
- ISBN-13 : 978-0446580571
- Dimensions : 17.78 x 5.08 x 24.13 cm
- Best Sellers Rank: 1,848,702 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- 1,381 in Legal History
- 8,965 in 20th Century U.S. History
- 21,530 in Law (Books)
- Customer reviews:
About the author

Noah Feldman is the Felix Frankfurter Professor of Law at Harvard University as well as a Senior Fellow of the Society of Fellows and a member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. He is a contributing writer for Bloomberg View.
Feldman credit Nina Subin small version.jpg
Before joining the Harvard faculty, Feldman was Cecelia Goetz Professor of Law at New York University School of Law. He was named a Carnegie Scholar in 2005. In 2004 he was a visiting professor at Yale Law School and a fellow of the Whitney Humanities Center. In 2003 he served as senior constitutional advisor to the Coalition Provisional Authority in Iraq, and advised members of the Iraqi Governing Council on the drafting of the Transitional Administrative Law or interim constitution. He served as a law clerk to Justice David H. Souter of the U.S. Supreme Court (1998 – 1999). Selected as a Rhodes Scholar, he earned a D. Phil. in Islamic Thought from Oxford University and a J.D. from Yale Law School, serving as Book Reviews Editor of the Yale Law Journal. He received his A.B. summa cum laude in Near Eastern Languages and Civilizations from Harvard University in 1992, finishing first in his class.
His new book, "The Three Lives of James Madison: Genius, Partisan, President" will be available on October 31, 2017 (Random House) and is available for pre-order here. He is the author of six other books including: Cool War: The Future of Global Competition (Random House, May 21, 2013), the award winning and acclaimed Scorpions: The Battles and Triumphs of FDR’s Great Justices(Twelve, 2010), The Fall and Rise of the Islamic State (Princeton University Press, 2008); Divided By God: America's Church-State Problem and What We Should Do About It (Farrar, Straus & Giroux 2005); What We Owe Iraq: War and the Ethics of Nation Building (Princeton University Press 2004); and After Jihad: America and the Struggle for Islamic Democracy (Farrar, Straus & Giroux 2003). He also co-authored two textbooks with Kathleen Sullivan, titled, "Constitutional Law", 19th Edition (Foundation Press, 2016) and "First Amendment Law", 6th Edition (Foundation Press, 2016). He has worked as a contributing writer for the New York Times Magazine.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings, help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyses reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from United Kingdom
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
The author did rely on some secondary sources yet this is a well written account of the individuals that made up the supreme court and how they were able to parley their relationship with Roosevelt into a seat on the Supreme Court. The four focused on all in their own way supported the New Deal Agenda that the president wanted to implement. We read how these four liberals relationships grew and changed over time and most interesting the inner-workings of the supreme court and the tensions between personalities and ambitions that existed. From the New Deal era through World War II and to their climatic decision on Brown vs. Board of Education decision.
Though all four were considered liberals when appointed each had his own convictions which formed their core beliefs. These justices in their methods of constitutional jurisprudence did not change their own core views; the country view on what was liberal is what changed based on their decisions. And the man who started as the most liberal man on the court became what today is called conservative even though he stayed true to his intellectual beliefs in constitutional law. These differences lead to robust debates that lead to their votes and supporting their individual positions.
The author discusses some of the cases that involved these justices. As one would expect some they agreed on and on many their viewed differed due to the aforementioned differing views on how the constitution should be interpreted and or applied. Frankfurter and Jackson were proponents of judicial restraint while Douglas and Black espoused a more active and aggressive judicial view. The ramifications of their judicial activism change the country and their decisions still affect people to this very day. These four great ambitious men would never be able to pass a senate confirmation hearing in today's politically correct world and one wonders if men of their conviction, intellect, ambition and flaws will ever sit on the high court again.





