Science and Human Origins Paperback – 16 Aug 2012
|New from||Used from|
- Choose from over 13,000 locations across the UK
- Prime members get unlimited deliveries at no additional cost
- Find your preferred location and add it to your address book
- Dispatch to this address when you check out
Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
About the Author
Ann Gauger is senior research scientist at Biologic Institute. She received her Ph.D. in developmental biology from the University of Washington and was a postdoctoral fellow at Harvard University. Douglas Axe is director of Biologic Institute and received his Ph.D. from Caltech. He previously held postdoctoral and research scientist positions at Cambridge University and the Babraham Institute. Casey Luskin is research coordinator at Discovery Institute s Center for Science and Culture. He earned his M.S. in earth sciences from the University of California, San Diego, and conducted geological research at the Scripps Institution for Oceanography.
Top Customer Reviews
Interestingly, “Science and Human Origins” seems to silently break with the DI's previous “broad tent strategy”. The articles explicitly argue in favor of Adam and Eve being real historical persons and claims that the theistic evolutionists of the BioLogos Foundation aren't good Christians. The book does claim that its arguments are compatible with goal-driven evolution, but this is probably an oblique reference to Michael Behe, a prominent supporter of the DI whose theistic "evolutionism” is very similar to old earth creationism.
The scientific merits, or otherwise, of Gauger-Axe-Luskin have been discussed elsewhere. Here, I will only make a few observations. The authors brush aside the genetic similarities between humans and chimpanzees very rashly. Yet, all studies confirm that humans (biologically speaking) really are “the third chimpanzee”. Humans and chimps are more closely related to each other, than any of them is to the gorilla. This, in turn, is connected to the entire notion of “nested hierarchies” in general, a fact not even mentioned in the book. The authors' claim that the missing link is still missing is also problematic.Read more ›
Neo-darwinian texts which deal with the topic of origins, aimed at the public, tend to make big-picture assertions, in order to (a) make the overarching narrative more believable, and (b) gloss over the critically strategic gaps in the science so that the reader doesn't once suspect how flimsy the whole house of cards actually is. Thus we get all those beautifully-illustrated reconstructions of 'Lucy', for example, to help us imagine ourselves related to such putative hominid ancestors. Lucy looks cute, we're told in no uncertain terms how closely we're related, and that's that. The sheer paucity of evidence underpinning those detailed illustrations is left to one side in the hope that the public will simply buy the line they're being sold. A more contemporary trend is for us, the poor ignorant non-specialists, to repose all our faith in individuals like Richard Dawkins, as we simply could not understand it on our own, poor dears, and we just need to trust the experts to interpret reality for us. And, of course, for Dawkins, reality simply isn't what it seems. If things look designed, then that's just plain misleading - and none of us will ever have the confidence again to draw our own informed conclusions. Better simply to trust the high priests of the new materialism.
What Gauger, Axe and Luskin do quite successfully here is take the big-picture themes, and then peel back the layers to expose what lies beneath.Read more ›
Most Recent Customer Reviews
The last section on the validity of common human descent from one pair of parents is interesting indeed.Published 18 months ago by Abdur Rakib
With this, the DI drop the mask and show themselves to be theologically driven creationists, with possible Young Earth creationist influences at that. Read morePublished on 4 Dec. 2013 by P. S. Braterman