Enter your mobile number below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Getting the download link through email is temporarily not available. Please check back later.

  • Apple
  • Android
  • Windows Phone
  • Android

To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.

Kindle Price: £18.10

Save £2.85 (14%)

includes VAT*
* Unlike print books, digital books are subject to VAT.

These promotions will be applied to this item:

Some promotions may be combined; others are not eligible to be combined with other offers. For details, please see the Terms & Conditions associated with these promotions.

Deliver to your Kindle or other device

Deliver to your Kindle or other device

Rwanda and the New Scramble for Africa: From Tragedy to Useful Imperial Fiction by [Philpot, Robin]
Kindle App Ad

Rwanda and the New Scramble for Africa: From Tragedy to Useful Imperial Fiction Kindle Edition

5.0 out of 5 stars 1 customer review

See all formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price
New from Used from
Kindle Edition
"Please retry"
Kindle Edition, 1 Dec 2013
£18.10

Length: 250 pages Word Wise: Enabled Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled
Page Flip: Enabled

Kindle Daily Deal
Kindle Daily Deals: Up to 70% off
Each day we unveil a new book deal at a specially discounted price - for that day only. Learn more about the Kindle Daily Deals or sign up for the Kindle Daily Deals Newsletter to receive free e-mail notifications about each day's deal.

Product Description

Review

"Explosive, very daring and solidly defended . . . a real bomb that rocks our interpretation of the Rwandan tragedy!" --"Le Devoir", Montreal

"Philpot's investigations show that behind all the words can be found an operation to destabilize and remodel the region." --"Africa International", Paris

"Robin Philpot's "Rwanda and the New Scramble for Afri"ca effectively dismantles a remarkable structure of disinformation on an important area and topic and it throws light on the broader thrust of imperial policy. This book is essential reading." --Edward S. Herman, economist and professor emeritus of finance, "Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania"

"The author makes strong, compelling cases.... "Rwanda and the New Scramble for Africa" presents an illuminating investigation of the Rwandan crisis that will often grip the attention of serious readers and foreign policy experts." --Karl Helicher, forewordreviews.com

"Philpot has provided us with an invaluable resource for understanding the Rwandan tragedy and for countering those who cite the tragedy in order to justify Western military interventions." --Yves Engler, "Montreal Review of Books"

"Robin Philpot's book makes an extremely valuable contribution. . . . "Rwandan and the New Scramble for Africa" is an essential read for anyone intersted in understanding the roots of the Rwandan tragedy." --Dan Glazebrooke, counterpunch.org

About the Author

Robin Philpot is a writer, translator, and publisher. He is the author of six books in French on international and Canada/Quebec political issues and is coauthor with Jacques Lacoursière of A People's History of Quebec.

Product details

  • Format: Kindle Edition
  • File Size: 5105 KB
  • Print Length: 250 pages
  • Publisher: Baraka Books (20 Dec. 2013)
  • Sold by: Amazon Media EU S.à r.l.
  • Language: English
  • ASIN: B00H6U9TY0
  • Text-to-Speech: Enabled
  • X-Ray:
  • Word Wise: Enabled
  • Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled
  • Average Customer Review: 5.0 out of 5 stars 1 customer review
  • Amazon Bestsellers Rank: #744,831 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
  •  Would you like to give feedback on images or tell us about a lower price?

Customer Reviews

5.0 out of 5 stars
5 star
1
4 star
0
3 star
0
2 star
0
1 star
0
See the customer review
Share your thoughts with other customers

Top Customer Reviews

Format: Paperback
In this remarkable book, Robin Philpot examines what really happened in Rwanda in the 1990s. In 1962, Rwanda won its independence from Belgian rule. The overthrown and exiled leaders invaded Rwanda seven times in the next five years, but failed.

In March 1993, Under Secretary of State George Moose told the US Senate, “we have to ensure that we have access to the tremendous natural resources in Africa, a continent that accounts for seventy-eight percent of the world’s chrome resources, eighty-nine percent of platinum reserves and fifty-nine percent of cobalt resources.” Ron Brown, US Secretary of Commerce, said, “America is going to be demanding of Africa’s traditional partners, starting with France. We are no longer going to leave Africa to the Europeans.”

In 1994, the US government set in motion the events that led to catastrophe. It backed the RPF [Rwandan Patriotic Front] when it rebelled against the Rwandan government. The RPF’s leader Paul Kagame, now Rwanda’s President, was personally responsible for killing President Juvénal Habyarimana of Rwanda, President Cyprien Ntaryamira of Burundi and others on 6 April 1994. The CIA was also involved.

Philpot observes, “Since the [Clinton] Administration was counting on a quick RPF victory, the increased use of the term ‘genocide’, which falsely described the situation as the Hutu majority hating and exterminating the innocent Tutsi minority, became the best way to enhance the image of the RPF and bring international opinion to believe that only the Hutu-dominated Rwandan Government forces were guilty of this horrible crime.
Read more ›
2 Comments One person found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse

Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta)

Amazon.com: HASH(0x8b095750) out of 5 stars 7 reviews
HASH(0x8ae89e28) out of 5 stars Ending double standards on Kagame's atrocities 29 Dec. 2015
By Otto Hampel - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
To Robin Philpot's credit, academics can now glean an accurate account of the genocidal humanitarian crimes of the Rwandan regime after the 1994 genocide against its own people. Philpot exposes the double standards that are advanced by the west in admonishing movements and anti-imperialist forces which are subjected to far more criticism than the government of Paul Kagame, who has been in power now for more than 20 years. The Rwandan/US supported genocide in the DRC, widely known in the region, has not reached the press, but thankfully scholars like Philpot have documented and accounted for these atrocities. Much more is necessary, but this is a good start.
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful
HASH(0x8bcb40e4) out of 5 stars POWERFUL ACCOUNT OF THE 1994 RWANDAN GENOCIDE 2 Nov. 2015
By Michael B. Green - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
November 30, 2015 UPDATE: This is definitely a first-rate extremely readable account of the Rwandan genocide that finally tells the story in an understandable, vivid, and emotionally moving form. Philpot's limitations of analytic depth described below are more than made up for by his compelling hands-on account of that imperial predation transmogrified by what used to be called, and remains, the lying lick-spittle media lapdog of its imperial masters, aka in academic respectability as the Herman-Chomsky propaganda model of the news, but better yet understood as Operation Mockingbird in action. I have read about a fourth of the book and may say more upon completion. What the critic Miller below describes as a one-sided account of the tragedy consists primarily of sound geopolitical reasoning and inference.

November 2, 2015: I was about to buy “Rwanda and the New Scramble for Africa” but hesitated to do so after reading an excerpt from it by Robin Philpot on globalresearch[dot]ca entitled “The Rwanda ‘Genocide Fax’. Who was behind the 1994 Massacres?” The author has a chatty but confusing style that enjoys the strength of narrative interpretation unburdened by excessive citations, but unfortunately he is not a good analyst of evidence. Philpot’s analysis of the "Genocide Fax" illustrates this. The Official Story has this fax, reportedly received by UNAMIR Force Commander Romeo Dallaire, warning of an impending Hutu genocide against Tutsis that tragically failed to produce relevant preventive action. Philpot gives a correct but limited interpretation of the genocide fax but never reaches the most important conclusion about it which by the time of this book’s publication had been well established for many years, i.e., this it is a forgery. His limited correct interpretation is this:

"The spin given to the fax story in The New Yorker could be summed up as follows: We in Washington are not guilty of having supported a murderous invading army that has spread death and destruction throughout central Africa. It’s those incompetent UN bureaucrats and especially that secretary general who did not take the obvious necessary measures to stop those horrible génocidaires from carrying out their evil plans. They did nothing even though they were sitting on unquestionable documentary evidence of a planned genocide. They did not even inform the international community."

The more important point is that this fax first surfaced after, and in response to, Romeo Dallaire's public statements that first denied and then affirmed prior knowledge of Hutu intent to commit genocide against Tutsi. The failure to find any UN documentary evidence of a pre-planned genocide by the Rwandan government against Tutsis was thus embarrassing to the US narrative. The fax filled that evidentiary gap, but is a partial forgery into which the allegations of genocide have been added by “cut and paste.” You can read some details proving this in “Enduring Lies: The Rwandan Genocide in the Propaganda System, 20 Years Later” by Edward Herman and David Peterson (H&P) but the far-better account comes from one of the lead defense counsels at the ICTR, Chris Black, whose 2005 online essay “The Dallaire Genocide Fax” provides a compelling analysis that Herman and Peterson unwisely truncate. I say “unwisely” because the more one understands the very deliberate plotting and deception at the core of media disinformation, the clearer a view one has of the mechanisms of state control at the center, a point that Herman and Chomsky notoriously scant, especially Chomsky, who remains as foolishly ignorant of USG domestic covert operations covered up by the propaganda system as do the masses. (To their credit, H&P do their best to make the mechanics of the deceit plain in appendices; even Black never says why the fact that ¶12 is missing matters: the likely problem was that the first page of the fax gave the total number of pages – 2 – and the forgers simply ran out of room.) Part of the evidence of its being a fake comes from the UN response to it that Philpot mentions but fails to appreciate properly, i.e., the UN response to the alleged genocide fax makes no reference to any mention of genocide. Still, even the short excerpt that I read of Philpot’s book shows that it clearly has lively details and political analyses that make it worth reading and it is highly recommended by Edward Herman, who reviewed it for Z-mag, a review worth reading.

In reviewing Philpot's book Eric clifrod [sic] Miller complains of its one-sidedness by writing, “Yes, the US supported the RPF but it did not create it as part of some grand Machiavellian conspiracy to steal the Congo's resources and destroy France's sphere of influence in the region.” I doubt that Philpot ever claimed that the US created the RPF in order to loot the Congo, but part of this criticism is likely justified even if there is some hyperbole from Miller about how Philpot views the US role – some more modest description of the US is justified, such as that the US trained, armed and supported a genocidal monster, Paul Kagame, because he served US goals of looting the Congo. It is not hard to see how a superficial reading of Philpot’s book might promote misinterpretation. After all, the back cover of Philpot's earlier "Rwanda 1994: Colonialism Dies Hard," states that "former UN Secretary General Boutros Boutros-Ghali declared to the author that the 'Rwandan genocide was 100 percent American responsibility.'" I would bet my right arm that Philpot includes this quote in his present book and such remarks may give the false impression that Philpot claims that the US created the genocide from whole cloth. Certainly Boutros-Ghali might believe that the US is 100% responsible for the genocide without suggesting that it made the RPF from scratch in order to loot the Congo, but I am nonetheless sympathetic to Miller’s discontent because I felt a similar dissatisfaction reading the very informative “Enduring Lies” cover-to-cover and was troubled by both its academic dryness – “genocide” in the abstract without the blood spilled – and its failure to grasp the particular lives and values and aspirations of the Africans themselves, and them acting in this monstrous affair under their own set of motivations even if they could never have achieved their genocidal goals but for the fact that these dovetailed so neatly with the geopolitical and economic ends of the US ruling class.

For example, on p.15 H&P quote with approval Malmood’s Mamdani’s account of the meaning of “Hutu” and “Tutsi”, i.e., “To be a Tutsi was thus to be in power, nearly power, or simply to be identified with power – just as to be a Hutu was more and more to be a subject,” which the authors summarize according to their political biases as a “longstanding class conflict within the Kingdom’s social order.” But one has only to open Gérard Prunier’s 1995 “The Rwandan Crisis, History of a Genocide,” to begin to see how such a sanitary description misses quite a lot.

[BEGIN QUOTE] In May 1958 [the year before the successful Hutu revolution], the Court notables declared that since Kigwa, the ancestor of the Banyinginya dynasty, had reduced the Hutu by force, there could be no fraternity between Tutsi and Hutu. The whole climate became poisoned as a political rivalry went into heavily symbolic disputes not amenable to reason. In October 1958, Joseph Gitera, one of the new Hutu leaders, asked Mgr Perrudin to get rid of the Kaliga, the sacred royal drum, because, being decorated with the testicles of vanquished Hutu princes it could not be considered a symbol of national unity. The Tutsi court notables strongly protested. [END QUOTE] (p.47)

Most of us can appreciate how such a difference of opinion between these two tribes over whether the Kalinga drum decorated with the testicles of defeated Hutu princes might serve as an adequate symbol of national unity reflects a deep-seated divergence of worldviews that may have escaped the notice of H&P. It would be fair to conclude that even absent the US there was not going to be one big happy African family, but at least the majority’s will and welfare would have prevailed in Rwanda much as the Sandinistas would have in Nicaragua but for the US arming and training and supporting the Contras. In too many ways H&P write a scholarly version of a legal brief whose primary purpose is assigning legal and moral responsibility for the genocide without much understanding of the visceral stakes at issue for the participants in the fighting, understanding of which is certainly insufficient to understand the genocides in Rwanda and the Congo. Thus, despite his keen understanding of African politics and passions, Prunier got the genocide exactly wrong whereas H&P got it right -- a genocide of the Hutus by the RPF/RPA mixed with slaughters of both groups by each other, and both strategic and tactical slaughters of Tutsi’s by the RPF/RPA (one reason so many of Kigame’s officers later turned against him) but the vast majority of the dead were Hutus -- so H&P vis-à-vis Prunier is a case of different authors playing to different strengths.

To repeat: What is missing from H&P is an understanding of how US military and intelligence assets take the cauldron of festering African passions and then decide how to intervene to achieve their geopolitical goals using the RPF/RPA as it finds it and building it into an even more useful shape, not by creating the RPF/RPA from whole cloth for its own ends, or turning it into a mere puppet of US interests. For a short but illuminating overall account of the 1994 Rwandan genocide and its liaison into the DRC under the fabricated pretext of killing the Hutu génocidaires sheltering there see Chris Black online “The Truth about Rwanda.” For a fascinating and largely, and perhaps perfectly, sincere first-hand account of the genocide by a key ICTR witness whose testimony helped to convince the very biased (anti-Hutu) judges that the Hutu defendants did not commit genocide, see online “Testimony of Abdul Ruzibiza about how mistakes by both the Rwandan Government and the RPF led to the Rwandan genocide of 1994.”

Ruzibiza, a high-ranking member of the RPF/RPA living in exile in Norway at the time (2009) demanded that Kagame be prosecuted for committing genocide, maintained sincerely but falsely that genocide occurred by both sides, so effective was the mindset and brainwashing of the Kagame intelligence network upon even his own troops. And even though Ruzibiza's very informative account omits the substance of his grievances, their intensity is conveyed when he describes Habyarimana in an aside as someone "whom I hated and opposed with a passion." Ruzibiza's account of the slaughters and Kagame's prior awareness and embrace of a genocide that Kagame knew included massive numbers of Tutsis provides all the blood and gore any of us might want to wade through and, remarkably, with considerable understanding of Ruzibiza's Hutu victim's feelings, calling Kagame's depredations cruel in the extreme and showing how Kagame routinely incorporated false-flag operations into the preliminary attacks in order to destroy the fabric of Rwandan society. He conveys a wish that the RPA's original leader, Fred Rwigyema, had not been slain in battle soon after the fighting started in 1990 (Kagame stopped his training at Ft. Leavenworth and took command) because "he would never have allowed an army under his command to engage in killings of civilians." Indeed, Ruzibiza’s argument is that Kagame and his troops behaved with such genocidal fury toward the Hutus that the retaliatory genocide was only to be expected.

[BEGIN QUOTE] Going deep inside the country meant surviving on what we found in the areas, and that was nowhere other than in villagers’ homes. If the home owner was present when we arrived, we killed them immediately. If they were absent, we destroyed the house, and took away all the goats, chickens and cattle for food. At times, meat became so plentiful that we started being very selective as to what we ate, with every one of us killing their own animal and taking only the heart, one leg, the liver, etc., leaving the rest to go to waste. About 20 people sharing 2 cows, 10 chickens, and 3 goats for food evidently was nothing but a display of wastefulness and cruelty. Now picture this: here’s a Hutu peasant who is not particularly informed about the RPF and its agenda, and then the same RPF shows up, kills his children, rapes his wife, takes away his cattle and destroys his property for which he has worked his entire life! Anyone wanting to understand how genocide happened need not look further. [END QUOTE]

Nonetheless, and crucially, such genocide of Hutu against Tutsi did not occur though horrific retributive slaughters -- still vastly less than what they suffered -- did.
9 of 15 people found the following review helpful
HASH(0x8bcb4174) out of 5 stars One sided, waste of money 10 April 2014
By Eric clifrod Miller - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Kindle Edition
When I bought this book I was looking forward to reading a more up to date version of the current events in the African great lakes region. Unfortunately it became clear very early on in the Mr. Philpot has his own agenda. His book becomes an apologist for Françafrique. I am no fan of Paul Kagame, he is a dictator. I am not denying the US interfered in the region, the problem is the book is completely one sided and the author uses dubious or no sources at all to support his argument. The book at times appears to be a collection of French conspiracy theories. The book downplays the horror of the Rwandan genocide all together, and Yes I am fully aware of the war crimes committed by the RPF in Rwanda and DRC that led to the deaths of over 5 million people. The idea though that the RPF is completely a creation of American foreign policy is absurd. Yes the US supported the RPF but it did not create it as part of some grand Machiavellian conspiracy to steal the Congo's resources and destroy France's sphere of influence in the region. The author makes the loaded accusations one after and another without any hard evidence or sometimes even a source to back his claims. I thought the absurd accusation made by Philpot is that the CIA helped assassinate the former presidents of Rwanda and Burundi. He makes this claim without any supporting evidence. When an author makes such claims with no evidence to back up their claims they stop being scholars and become proselytizers or conspiracy theory nuts.

If you want a good balanced book, by another Francaphone author, who covers both the sides of the story thoroughly and covers the abuses committed on all sides than read Gerard Prunier's book, Africa's World War.
4 of 8 people found the following review helpful
HASH(0x8aedb390) out of 5 stars An Eye-Opener! 23 Feb. 2014
By Gail F. Hughes - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
This is a well-researched and revealing book that provides support for Edward Herman's hypothesis about the treatment of "worthy" vs. "unworthy" victims in The Politics of Genocide (2011).
4 of 8 people found the following review helpful
HASH(0x8afdb3c0) out of 5 stars Don't use "Rwanda" as a meme for military intervention 9 April 2014
By Greg Hunter - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Kindle Edition Verified Purchase
"Rwanda" was caused by military intervention - the use backed proxy forces that invaded Rwanda from Uganda called the RPF and then invaded Zaire.
Were these reviews helpful? Let us know
click to open popover