Buy used:
£5.00
+ £2.90 UK delivery
Used: Good | Details
Sold by HIDE PRODUCTS
Condition: Used: Good
Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon

Floundering

5.0 out of 5 stars 2 customer reviews

Available from these sellers.
1 used from £5.00
  • Great fun and simple to play
  • 2-6 Players
  • Manufacturers recommended age 4 years +

STEM Toys Find Games for kids, card games, board games and more at the Amazon Games Store


Special Offers and Product Promotions


Product Information

Technical Details
Item Weight358 g
Product Dimensions24.2 x 16.4 x 4.2 cm
Manufacturer recommended age:3 years and up
Item model number99114
  
Additional Information
ASINB0006D3940
Best Sellers Rank 386,127 in Toys & Games (See top 100)
Shipping Weight358 g
Delivery Destinations:Visit the Delivery Destinations Help page to see where this item can be delivered.
Date First Available1 Jan. 2004
  
Feedback
 

Product Description

Manufacturer's Description

Get fishing, to win!

In this fun game, you'll need to lay down your rod & line and see how many flounders you can catch using the dice! Catch them piece by piece or whole, but the more you catch, the more likely you are to win the game.


What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?


Customer Questions & Answers

Customer Reviews

5.0 out of 5 stars
5 star
2
4 star
0
3 star
0
2 star
0
1 star
0
See both customer reviews
Share your thoughts with other customers

Top Customer Reviews

My daughter age 7 still enjoys this game which we have had since she was 4. I thoroughly recommend it.
1 Comment 6 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
It is the best game I have ever played. 4 friends and I played the game for around 5 hours straight, I have never had such a fun night. It was the variation of the game called strip floundering! ;)
Comment One person found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse