Repairing British Politics: A Blueprint for Constitutional Change Paperback – 1 Feb 2010
|New from||Used from|
- Choose from over 13,000 locations across the UK
- Prime members get unlimited deliveries at no additional cost
- Find your preferred location and add it to your address book
- Dispatch to this address when you check out
Frequently Bought Together
Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought
Enter your mobile number below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Getting the download link through email is temporarily not available. Please check back later.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
...the book is a must-read for anyone who wants to get a modern grip of our constitutional angst. Gordon's punchy 35-page scene-setting narrative and critique of our system of parliamentary supremacy (motif: nobody ever voted for it), should be mandatory reading for those who want to think about this issue properly. --Ian Caplin, Times Online, May 6, 2010<br /><br />...a coherent and well constructed argument in favour of a written constitution. It is a succinct yet masterful combination of politics, philosophy, constitutional theory, law and history, accessible to lawyers and non-lawyers alike. It is a must read for anyone interested in the future of the UK constitution...the real meat of Repairing British Politics is Gordon s draft constitution, with accompanying observations and explanatory notes, which certainly leave the reader with much to chew on...Richard Gordon has initiated a timely and much needed debate in legal and political circles over the future of the UK constitution. He makes a reasoned and persuasive case on the need for change. He posits a well-drafted proposal with explanations. Despite suggesting the disbanding of certain existing political bonds not least parliamentary sovereignty he does so with a justified cause, namely the promotion of real democracy. Although by no means perfect or indeed complete, the draft is good starting point from which to take this debate forwards. Like Paine before him, Gordon offers us a way forward by re-depositing the ultimate power of society in the people themselves. Gordon s very own Republic is a platform for debate in classrooms, canteens and the Commons itself. --Qudsi Rasheed, Legal Officer (Human Rights), JUSTICE, Volume 7, Number 1, 2010<br /><br />In this work Gordon combines his expertise as a QC - specialising in administrative and public law and human rights - with an historical approach, to produce an argument about the need for change in the UK constitution, and a set of proposals about what it should become...it is informative and enjoyable to read, and fulfils its purpose well, in that it makes an effective case for a written constitution and could form a useful basis for discussions of what such an entity should comprise. I recommend it to anyone interested in the way we are governed, including those who (unlike myself) do not agree with its central arguments. --Andrew Blick, Open Democracy, 19th March 2010
...Richard Gordon s thoughtful contribution to the debate is both timely and worthy of very careful study. Repairing British Politics is a cautiously ambitious book: Gordon has gone to the considerable effort of drafting a constitution for the United Kingdom, and has even included a helpful glossary of terms at the beginning to help readers who are not lawyers or professional followers of politics...the real point of buying the book is the draft Constitution itself. It should be said at the outset that Gordon has produced an outstanding piece of constitutional scholarship in that he has codified a considerable amount of constitutional law and produced a coherent and comprehensive structure to both existing and new constitutional principles...It should also be noted that the Observations and Explanatory Notes Gordon provides after each part of the Constitution are immensely helpful in clarifying the thinking behind some of the choices made and the drafting used, and represent a real work of learning in themselves...Repairing British Politics does not contain all the answers and will not be the final word. It is not meant to be. But it will be impossible for anyone to seriously engage with the debate about moving to a written constitution without having digested and considered Richard Gordon s work. That is an achievement of which to be very proud. --C.J.S. Knight, Public Law, Issue 3, July 2010
In this work Gordon combines his expertise as a QC - specialising in administrative and public law and human rights - with an historical approach, to produce an argument about the need for change in the UK constitution, and a set of proposals about what it should become...it is informative and enjoyable to read, and fulfils its purpose well, in that it makes an effective case for a written constitution and could form a useful basis for discussions of what such an entity should comprise. I recommend it to anyone interested in the way we are governed, including those who (unlike myself) do not agree with its central arguments. --Andrew Blick, Open Democracy, 19th March 2010
About the Author
Richard Gordon QC, a member of Brick Court Chambers, London, is recognised as one of the UK's leading silks in administrative and public law and human rights. He is a Visiting Professor at University College London and at the Chinese University of Hong Kong. He has acted in many of the most important public law and human rights cases in recent years, and appears regularly before the House of Lords and Court of Appeal and in foreign jurisdictions as well as before the ECJ and European Court of Human Rights.
Top Customer Reviews
His approach is eclectic, tidying up the monarchy and the attorney general, part-reforming the House of Lords (renamed "Senate"), and introducing a "citizen's branch" to make extemporaneous proposals. His experience should be taken seriously--he has drafted constitutions and has a distinguished career in the field. He modestly says that he offers his book to start a debate.
RG dispels the misapprehension that Britain has never had a written constitution: Cromwell had two; and he draws attention to the uncertain character of the doctrine of parliamentary sovereignty, with some jurists claiming that it falls out of common law and thus becomes fully subject to judicial interpretation.
This takes us to the central problem of our constitutional dilemma--there are no de jure limits on our legislature, Parliament, but that it has been captured by the executive for generations (as far back as the forties, Harold Wilson got his first in PPE by writing an essay on the topic), also surrendering powers by treaty, in particular to the European Union but also to a piecemeal programme of judicial intervention. This hotchpotch was intended by no-one, leaves many confused and dissatisfied, so opening the door to proposals like those from RG. Do they do the trick? That's hardly the point: after all RG makes it clear that he is trying to provoke a debate. So just a couple of points.Read more ›