• RRP: £21.51
  • You Save: £1.32 (6%)
FREE Delivery in the UK.
Temporarily out of stock.
Order now and we'll deliver when available. We'll e-mail you with an estimated delivery date as soon as we have more information. Your account will only be charged when we dispatch the item.
Dispatched from and sold by Amazon. Gift-wrap available.
Remedy and Reaction: The ... has been added to your Basket
+ £2.80 UK delivery
Used: Like New | Details
Sold by thriftbooks-USA
Condition: Used: Like New
Comment: All items ship from the USA.  Arrival time is usually 2-3 weeks. Almost in new condition. Book shows only very slight signs of use. Cover and binding are undamaged and pages show minimal use. Spend Less. Read More. Your satisfaction is guaranteed.
Have one to sell?
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

Remedy and Reaction: The Peculiar American Struggle Over Health Care Reform Hardcover – 25 Oct 2011

See all formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price
New from Used from
"Please retry"
£20.19 £3.22
Note: This item is eligible for click and collect. Details
Pick up your parcel at a time and place that suits you.
  • Choose from over 13,000 locations across the UK
  • Prime members get unlimited deliveries at no additional cost
How to order to an Amazon Pickup Location?
  1. Find your preferred location and add it to your address book
  2. Dispatch to this address when you check out
Learn more
£20.19 FREE Delivery in the UK. Temporarily out of stock. Order now and we'll deliver when available. We'll e-mail you with an estimated delivery date as soon as we have more information. Your account will only be charged when we dispatch the item. Dispatched from and sold by Amazon. Gift-wrap available.
click to open popover

Special Offers and Product Promotions

Enter your mobile number below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Getting the download link through email is temporarily not available. Please check back later.

  • Apple
  • Android
  • Windows Phone

To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.

Product details

Customer Reviews

There are no customer reviews yet on Amazon.co.uk.
5 star
4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star

Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta)

Amazon.com: HASH(0x8a79a630) out of 5 stars 12 reviews
25 of 26 people found the following review helpful
HASH(0x8aabf8d0) out of 5 stars Readable discussion of health care reform 4 Nov. 2011
By bjcefola - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Hardcover
This is an extraordinarily readable discussion of health care reform. The book is worth getting for the first chapter alone, which summarizes reform efforts from the progressive era through Carter with enough detail to articulate why programs like Medicare succeeded versus the many others that failed.

Starr then devotes chapter length treatments to the Clinton and Obama plans, describing how the Clinton plan got sandbagged and how Democrats in 2009 struggled to avoid the same fate.

Highly recommended!
33 of 36 people found the following review helpful
HASH(0x8ae0e6bc) out of 5 stars Excellent - 24 Oct. 2011
By Loyd Eskildson - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Hardcover
The U.S. spends far more on health care than others - 17.6% of GDP, compared to an average of about 9% in other economically advanced nations. Meanwhile, as of 2010, about 50 million Americans are without health insurance at any time, our outcomes are, at best, only comparable, and variation in disease rates do not explain the cost differences either. Higher prices, however, do. Paul Starr's 'Remedy and Reaction' provides excellent insight into how this has occurred. Briefly, during the first half of the 20th century the U.S. diverged from the more common path taken by western democracies and failed to establish a general system to finance health care. Instead, it ensnared itself in what Starr calls 'a policy trap,' devising an increasingly costly and complicated system that satisfied enough of the public (veterans - a separate system established after WWI; employer provided - encouraged by tax benefits and its offering a way around WWII wage/price controls; Medicare - 1965; Medicaid - 1965) and so enriched the industry as to make change very difficult now that it consumes nearly one-fifth the American economy. When the major European countries created their national insurance systems between the 1880s and early 1900s, health care was a small proportion of their economies, about 3%, and thus much more easily maneuvered.

Now, not only are providers and insurers likely to provide strong resistance to change, the public is as well. Some because they view their existing coverage as 'earned' and resent others receiving similar status, others see their freedom of choice being limited, while fear of benefit reductions and/or growth in government spending motivate still others. Of course, providers and insurers have also learned to take advantage of these mostly highly organized and vocal groups for their own benefit. The result - proposals for change to-date have been forced to follow far more complicated paths than those of an ideal solution, thereby making acceptance even more difficult and expensive. Overhead expenditures for private insurance in the U.S. average 30% - a single, government plan, or even standardized rules for multiple insurance fund sources offer significant savings (eg. 3% overhead expenditures for Medicare) - yet, partly because health care expenditures are generally shared between employer, employee, and government, the pain has not yet reached the point of forcing major restructuring - despite family health premiums rising 87% from 2000 to 2006 while real median household income declined 3%, and general recognition that control of our deficit and unfunded liabilities is impossible without throttling rising health care costs. Thus, conservative politicians (Republicans) are able to not only block reform efforts with impunity, but seemingly are rewarded for doing so in subsequent elections. (Starr notes that ideological obstacles have strengthened - by 2009, every Republican Senator had a voting record to the right of their most conservative Democrat colleagues.)

Complications in drafting any legislation in this area include who to cover (eg. illegal immigrants), what to cover (eg. abortion), how to finance the system (federal, state, individual, employer), mandating coverage (essential for insurance company acceptance and financial soundness, but guaranteed to generate major legal challenges), and how long to take phasing in the new system (faster --> higher immediate costs, slower --> greater opportunity for opponents to create obstacles). Vocal and dishonest conservative mouthpieces are another major problem - eg. false claims of mandatory counseling every five years on end-of-life planning, 'death panels,' 'government takeover; scripted disruptions of Town Hall meeting to discuss the topic).

The result - the future of 'ObamaCare' is uncertain, the legislation is overly complex (2,000+ pages), and its cost-controls are weak (adherence to efficacy research findings cannot be mandated).
5 of 5 people found the following review helpful
HASH(0x8ab6ce58) out of 5 stars So Good It Changed My Mind! 1 Dec. 2012
By Anne Mills - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Hardcover Verified Purchase
An excellent and very informative history of government efforts to reform health care in the U.S., leading up to a brilliant analysis of the politics that shaped and (just barely) achieved the passage of the Affordable Care Act (aka Obamacare) in 2010. The second half of the book is fascinating, a political thriller that (like Spielberg's "Lincoln") lays bare the grubby political maneuvering that allowed the achievement of a morally desirable end.

As a progressive Democrat, I had though that Obamacare did too little, and gave away too much to health-care interests. This book made it clear to me that, in 2010, the sort of health care reform that progressives wanted was not politically possible. It also made it clear to me that Obamacare was a major achievement that will have increasingly positive effects over time -- an achievement that now seems likely to remain in place.

Given the enormous amount that has been written on current U.S. health policy, it is hard to know where to turn for analysis. Paul Starr's resume suggests that this book is a good place to start. He is an eminent expert in the field of public policy. He is a professor of sociology and public affairs at the Woodrow Wilson School at Princeton, co-founded the liberal magazine "The American Prospect", and has written many books on public policy, including the Pulitzer winning "The Social Transformation of American Medicine". Despite his academic background, however, he writes in a real world political framework, and has the experience to back it up -- he was a senior advisor to President Clinton during the 1993 attempt to reform healthcare. Clearly, he has a liberal back- ground, but his analysis focuses on facts.

The first half of the book surveys efforts to reform U.S. health care over the past hundred years. In so doing, it shows why the U.S. system has evolved so differently from that in most other wealthy democracies, where access to health care has long been treated as a basic right. There is a lot more to this difference than the "greedy health care interests" that progressives like me view as the problem. The interests are certainly greedy, but then so are most people and institutions, in most countries. In part, the U.S. situation reflects an individualistic national ethos, and in part a series of historical accidents. Starr's focus is not, however, on American exceptionalism, or on randomness.

Rather, his point is that efforts to reform health care in the US contributed to the development of a system that is extraordinarily hard to reform. Two of these were critical. First, in 1953, the IRS ruled that employer contributions to group health insurance policies were not taxable. That made health benefits an attractive way for companies to compete for labor, and employer-based insurance became the dominant form of health care provision in the U.S. This meant that a large portion of the population was reasonably well insured against medical costs -- they formed a "protected population" that did not face any personal need for improved access to medical care. Second, in 1965, President Johnson pushed through Medicare, and Medicaid. Like employer-based insurance, Medicare put many millions of people into a protected category.

These two events created a big protected population, creating what Starr calls a "policy trap". That is, as he describes it, "an increasingly costly and complicated system that has satisfied enough of the public and so enriched the health-care industry as to make change extraordinarily difficult." The first half of the book shows how we reached that policy trap.

The last section of the book, happily, is not nearly so relevant as it was when the book was published in October of 2011. That is because it dealt with the threats to Obamacare from the then-pending Supreme Court decision, and from the 2012 election. Those removed the threat of judicial overthrow or a post-election repeal. For this, many people should give thanks.

The second half shows how the Obama Administration succeeded in implementing a truly major reform of health care despite this trap -- and by the skin of its teeth. This half is much more fun that the first half, because most of the players are still very much with us, and because the events are just fading out of the headlines. Starr writes it like a political thriller, with lots of who did what to -- and for -- whom. This discussion, however, benefits enormously from the less entertaining first half of the book, which makes it clear why Obamacare was so hard to pass, and why it had to be more limited than many progressives would have liked.

In a penultimate section, Starr analyses the Affordable Care Act, treating it as a major but limited effort. Its key effects are to sharply reduce the percentage of the U.S. population that is uninsured, from 17% to an estimated 6%, and to improve protection for the middle class. But it does this mostly through changes in insurance, leaving the organization of medical care largely unchanged. It includes efforts to slow the growth of spending on health care, but does not assure that end.
Despite that, after reading Mr. Starr's book, I feel much more positive about Obamacare than I did. It may not be perfect, but -- given the obstacles to reform -- it is important and impressive.

For those who are interested in a more polished review, check out the NYT review at [...]
3 of 3 people found the following review helpful
HASH(0x8a8c3ccc) out of 5 stars Health care reform 13 Feb. 2012
By Chalmers M Nunn, Jr - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Hardcover Verified Purchase
This book helps continue the story Paul Starr began with his book The Social Transformation of American Medicine. A timely read.
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
HASH(0x8ad94624) out of 5 stars A comprehensive examination of the US government's involvement in the health care of its citizens 29 Aug. 2013
By Fred B. Smith - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Kindle Edition Verified Purchase
Professor Starr has demonstrated unparalleled mastery of the social history of health care in the US in his previous authoritative volume, The Social Transformation of American Medicine. As a physician with some limited work experience out of the country, I've been very gratified to learn, from his writing, why medicine is practiced so differently here than elsewhere.
This current work is a rigorous, detailed examination of the history of attempts to enlist the US society at large in the health care of its citizens, and includes a thoughtful explanation of how these efforts have been repeatedly derailed.
The book is to be valued especially for its account of the evolution of the Affordable Care Act. For example, I had forgotten -- or perhaps didn't pay attention in the passing of events -- such turning points as when candidate Obama changed his mind on the issue of the individual mandate.
Some may find their eyes glazing over with the recapping of events that transpired in Congress during these years, they are described in such detail. This is more than compensated for by the incisive and powerful summaries Starr provides in the introduction and in the concluding pages of the book.
Were these reviews helpful? Let us know