Raymond Weil Sport Quartz Men's Analogue-Digital Watch 8400-SR1-20001

5.0 out of 5 stars 1 customer review

Available from these sellers.
When dispatched by Amazon.co.uk, this item is delivered by secure courier and requires a signature upon delivery. See Details.
  • Scratch-Resistant Sapphire Window Lens
  • Round Stainless Steel Case with Stainless Steel Bezel
  • Rubber Band with Push Button Clasp
  • Water Resistant to 200 metres
1 new from £995.00

Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon

Special Offers and Product Promotions

Product Specifications

Watch Information
Brand Name Raymond Weil
Model number 8400 -SR1-20001
Part Number 8400 -SR1-20001
Item Shape round
Dial Window Material Type sapphire
Display Type Analogue
Clasp Type Push Button Clasp
Case Material Stainless Steel
Case Diameter 42 millimetres
Case Thickness 13 millimetres
Band Material Rubber
Band Width 19 millimetres
Band Colour black
Dial Colour black
Bezel Material Stainless Steel
Calendar Date
Movement Quartz
Water Pressure Resistance 20 bar
Warranty Type Amazon 2 Year Warranty
Warranty Description 2 years

Product details

  • Boxed-product Weight: 948 g
  • Delivery Destinations: Visit the Delivery Destinations Help page to see where this item can be delivered.
    Find out more about our Delivery Rates and Returns Policy
  • Item model number: 8400 -SR1-20001
  • ASIN: B003QP499O
  • Date first available at Amazon.co.uk: 20 July 2010
  • Average Customer Review: 5.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (1 customer review)
  • Amazon Bestsellers Rank: 60,387 in Watches (See Top 100 in Watches)

Product Description

Product Description

Raymond Weil, men's, Analogue Digital, Quartz, Date, rubber,GMT,



Customer Questions & Answers

Customer Reviews

5.0 out of 5 stars
5 star
1
4 star
0
3 star
0
2 star
0
1 star
0
See the customer review
Share your thoughts with other customers

Top Customer Reviews

Beautiful watch! Very comfortable to wear.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse