Learn more Shop now Shop now Shop now Shop now Shop now Shop now Learn More Shop now Shop now Learn more Shop Fire Shop Kindle Amazon Music Unlimited 4 months for £0.99 Shop now Fitbit

There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.

on 22 February 2003
An exceptional book which in just over 100 pages tackles one of Quantum Physics' fundaments in a remarkably easy to absorb way. Popular science books all too often appear to be maximizing the 'Wow' factor and tend to be condescending and/or superficial. Not this book which actually succeeds in casting light on the measurement problem. While this may not sound all that exciting, you'll be gripped by it. I for one found it to be one of the most rewarding books I've come across for a long time. [ It actually containing a few (simple) equations, bless the author, but you can skip them without missing the main points.]
0Comment| 38 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 14 October 2003
This book deals with the fascinating problem of finding a realistic philosophical interpretation for quantum mechanics. It presents the several existing approaches to this problem, both the older ones and the newer. Whoever is interested in this topic, be she/he a physicist or a general reader, will find this book very readable, clear, and extremely interesting.
0Comment| 27 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 30 May 2013
good read....not quite for the layman as I first thought....but had to read it twice to really get some parts....definitely makes you think !
0Comment| 2 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 8 September 2011
In terms of classical physics, the physical reality may be defined as matter and energy behaving according to the laws of physics in classical spacetime, and the human being is a passive observer of this reality. According to quantum physics, matter and energy behave according to the laws of quantum physics in quantized spacetime, and the human observer is an integral part of this reality: The quantum physics include consciousness as an integral part of its laws.

In this book the author discusses the deficiencies of two major interpretations of quantum physics: The Copenhagen interpretation expounded by Niels Bohr and the Many worlds' interpretation proposed by Hugh Everett III. The author also discusses a third hypothesis called the consistent histories approach. The book starts with a traditional text book style introduction to Young's double slit experiments. In a popular book such as this, it is a turn off, because an ordinary reader would like to read more about the descriptive part rather than the experimental part. Complicating this further, some chapters require reasonable knowledge of physics and mathematics and an interest in experimental physics to appreciate the subject matter.

The quantum physical problem arises from how elementary particles at the microscopic level (quantum physics) are measured from the macroscopic instruments (classical physics). In the quantum world, an elementary particle or a collection of such particles can exist in a superposition of two or more possible states of physical being. It can be in a superposition of different locations, velocities and orientations of its spin anywhere in the universe, but when we measure one of these properties we see one of the elements of the superposition, but not a combination of them. The measuring macroscopic object will not be in this superposition. How do we explain this unique world of reality emerge from the multiplicities of alternative superposed quantum states? The wave functions that represent each quantum state treat each element of the superposition as equally real (but not necessarily equally probable.)

The Schrödinger equation delineates how a quantum system's wave function will change through time. This predicts a smooth and deterministic (no randomness) change. But mathematics contradicts this when humans observe a quantum system with an instrument. At the moment of measurement, the wave function describing the superposition of all states collapse into one member of the superposition, thus interrupting the smooth evolution of the wave function and introducing discontinuity in the system. The selected state at the moment of measurement is arbitrary, and its emergence does not evolve logically from the information packed wave function of the particle. In addition, the mathematics of collapse does not emerge from the seamless flow of the Schrödinger equation, but collapse has to be added as an additional process that seems to violate the equation. This is the main argument of the Copenhagen interpretation. This approach privileges the external observer in a classical realm distinct from the quantum realm of the object observed and the nature of the boundary between the quantum and classical realms remains unclear.

The Many worlds' interpretation addresses precisely this point by merging the microscopic and macroscopic worlds, thus making the observer an integral part of the quantum system. A universal wave function links macroscopic observers and microscopic objects as a part of a single quantum system, which would introduce a discontinuity in the wave-function collapse. Conversely, if we assume the continuous evolution of wave functions is not interrupted by the act of measurement. And if the Schrödinger equation holds good even for objects and observers alike with no elements of superposition banished from reality. Under these circumstances the wave function of an observer would, in effect, bifurcate at each interaction of the observer with a superposed object. The universal wave function would contain branches for every alternative making up the object's superposition. Each branch has its own copy of the observer, a copy that perceived one of those alternatives as the outcome (resulting in multiple universes). According to a fundamental mathematical property of the Schrödinger equation, once formed, the branches do not influence one another. Thus, each branch (universe) embarks on a different future, independently of the others.

The consistent histories is based on a consistency criterion that allows the history of a system to be described such that the probabilities for each history obey the rules of classical probability while being consistent with Schrodinger's equation. It turns out that none of these theories are completely satisfactory. At the end of the book, the author expresses hope that sometime in future, quantum physics will be able to distinguish the illusion and physical realty. This is farfetched because there is a growing consensus among many physicists that the answers to the problems in quantum reality may be found in string physics such as superstring theory or brane physics, and not through the unification of quantum physics with classical physics. Some physicists even believe that the unification of the two theories with respect to the gravitational force is inherently problematic if not impossible.
0Comment| 2 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 5 January 2008
"Illusion or Reality" sets out clearly the unavoidable difficulties of any attempt to visualise what is actually going on in the quantum world. You may end up agreeing with those quantum purists who insist that it is best not to ask; but at least the author deals with all the main attempts at interpretation in a generally unbiassed way, only revealing his own preferences in a final summary chapter. A slim book, it is by no means a quick read: the subject is precisely argued and concisely expressed.

I found only one misprint in this book, annoyingly in an equation - a missing minus sign on page 41. And in only one place did the presentation seem at all partial. Einstein (and his EPR partners) come out pretty badly from this analysis of their objections to the consequences of the Bohr interpretation: granted that Einstein's hidden variables have - ironically - turned out to require the very non-locality to which he was objecting; that still does not let Bohr and his Copenhagen group off the non-local hook.

This book is a balanced take on a subject that Richard Feynman asserted nobody understands.The bibliography is also excellent, opening up many possibilities for further reading in related fields.

Footnote: A. Rodgers (see comment) kindly points out that I have slipped up over the page number. Sorry about that. Could be quantum indeterminacy at work; could be senior indeterminacy.
44 Comments| 17 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 4 August 2001
Easy to read, informative, interesting and well laid out. In my opion Rae is the author on quantum physics, both this book and "Quantum Mechanics", also by Rae make a very tricky subject suprisingly easy to follow.
0Comment| 21 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 30 March 2010
The first edition was good, but often explanations were over simplified so much, that they became wrong.
This has been corrected to a great extent in the new edition.
It is very informative to compare the two editions.
0Comment| 6 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 18 November 2012
This book, with all its merits and demerits, is not a balanced introduciton to quantum physics. It touches on some main issues, but the emphasis is on the measurement problem, with quite some technical discussions of photons. These are handled well, but do not add up to an overview of quantum physics. Thus, indeterminacy, entangling, quantum jumping, multiple dimensions, gravity, and other cardinal issues are not mentioned at all or discussed much too hastily. And, most disturbing of all, the standard model as a whole is not presented and discussed systematically.
Instead, the book allocates space to esoteric issues, such as extrasensory perception (pp. 73-74); and doubtful comments on the philosophy of the mind (pp. 62-72). Still, readers particularly interested in the measurement problem will find the book worth reading. But I cannot recommend it as a general introduction to quantum physics.
Professor Yehezkel Dror
The Hebrew University of Jerusalem
0Comment| 2 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse

Need customer service? Click here

Sponsored Links

  (What is this?)