- Also check our best rated Biography reviews
The Princes In The Tower Paperback – 6 Mar 1997
Customers who bought this item also bought
What other items do customers buy after viewing this item?
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
trade edition paperback fine condition In stock shipped from our UK warehouse
Top customer reviews
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
The impression I get reading this is that the aim was to confirm his guilt over the disappearance of the Princes. Motive is well considered as to why he might have done them harm, as part of the feud with the Wydville family and his own survival. But the evidence is too reliant on second hand sources, chiefly Sir Thomas More, who had evidence of a confession from a Knight who was allegedly involved on the night of the murders.
The problem with this is that evidence extracted under torture or threat invariably ends up being whatever the imprisoner wants it to be. Further, Richard III was not popular - he behaved as a despot and had a large number of nobles executed without trial within a very short timeframe. Once he was dead, anyone wanting to censure him could do so with impunity, and any looking to provide a counterpoint would either already be dead or unwilling to speak up. To make things even more complex, Henry VII, who eventually turned out to be no less despotic and paranoid, had a great many of the surviving gentry killed, imprisoned or effectively blackmailed during his own reign meaning that many of those who were present during the last days of the House of York never gave any testimony or account of what they saw. Effectively, the civil war and strife caused by rebellions and scheming continued well into Henry VIII's reign. It did not all end at Bosworth in 1485.
In the final reckoning, Richard probably did cause the Princes' death. In this, he was a man of his time, ruthless and brutal. His successor was equally unpleasant, but had a dynasty following him and his own crimes were carried out over many years. Richard III's deeds were all over a very short period and he died in battle, so history has been less forgiving.
So, overall not a bad narrative - but as with any consideration of history, please bear its context in mind and treat it carefully. Worth a read.
And the princes bodies are discussed in only a very brief chapter at the end. Nothing important in that respect is really said. Weir has it out for Richard III and her assumptions are not really very scientific. Although Richard III probably did murder his nephews and commit many of the other atrocities of his reign, Weir's assertions to the fact go far beyond what the historical record really indicate. It's not a great book. I would look elsewhere if you are looking to read about this interesting moment in English history.
Would you like to see more reviews about this item?
Most recent customer reviews
and you'll damage the thriving market for all those things which rely on Richard III...Read more