The Precariat: The New Dangerous Class Paperback – 10 Apr 2014
- Choose from over 13,000 locations across the UK
- Prime members get unlimited deliveries at no additional cost
- Find your preferred location and add it to your address book
- Dispatch to this address when you check out
Frequently bought together
Customers who bought this item also bought
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
Would you like to tell us about a lower price?
If you are a seller for this product, would you like to suggest updates through seller support?
A very important book. --Noam Chomsky, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA
Guy Standing provides an incisive account of how precariousness is becoming the new normality in globalised labour markets, and offers important guidelines for all concerned to build a more just society. --Richard Hyman, London School of Economics, UK
Buy Guy Standing's book, The Precariat! Or nick/borrow it! --John Harris, The Guardian
About the Author
Guy Standing is Professor of Development Studies at the School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS), University of London, UK. He has previously been Professor of Economic Security at the University of Bath, UK, Professor of Labour Economics at Monash University, Australia and Director of the Socio-Economic Security Programme of the International Labour Organization. He is co-president of the Basic Income Earth Network. His recent books include Work after Globalization: Building Occupational Citizenship (2009) and Beyond the New Paternalism: Basic Security as Equality (2002).
What other items do customers buy after viewing this item?
Top customer reviews
Guy Standing sets out his argument that there is a global class, ‘the precariat’, which consists of many millions of people. Moreover, almost all of us could potentially find ourselves in the precariat at some point, even if we are not in it currently. Not yet a class-for -itself, partly because it is disunited, the precariat must become a class-for-itself in order to abolish itself, by being sufficiently united to put pressure on governments to introduce policies which would make its position less precarious.
Standing discusses what he means by the precariat. While by no means a homogeneous group, temporary labouring status comprises a central aspect of it, as does lack of a secure work-based identity. Another feature of the precariat is precarious income and a pattern of income that is different from that of other groups. The precariat fares badly in the seven aspects of labour-related security which Standing identifies as pursued by social democrats, labour parties and trade unions as their ‘industrial citizenship’ agenda for the working class after the Second World War (for example: adequate opportunities to obtain jobs, protection against arbitrary dismissal, assurance of an adequate stable income and possessing a collective voice in the labour market).
Standing discusses where the precariat came from and why it is growing so rapidly; he identifies the policies and institutional changes in the globalisation era (1975 – 2008) which have created this huge group of people with no anchor of stability. Standing’s view is that, while the neo-liberal thinkers who emerged in the late 1970s were partially correct in their diagnosis (that, in a globalised world, investment, employment and income would flow to where conditions were most welcoming), their prognosis was callous. One of the key neo-liberal ideas was that labour markets must become more flexible.
Standing talks about ‘the precariatised mind’, ‘The precariat is defined by short-termism, which could evolve into a mass incapacity to think long term, induced by the low probability of personal progress or building a career’, and he links this to an interesting point about the long-term effect which the digitised world, with its lack of respect for contemplation or reflection, is having on the brain. Standing goes on to say, ‘the precariat suffers from information overload without a lifestyle that could give them the control and capacity to sift the useful from the useless’.
Standing also discusses the lack of control which the precariat has over time. He talks of the huge amount of ‘work’ which is not ‘labour’ (i.e. unpaid work-related activities) which many members of the precariat are required to do, such as applying for jobs, travelling to interviews, travelling to the jobcentre, queuing at the jobcentre, completing forms to obtain social security benefits, keeping skills up-to-date, acquiring new skills, and so on. There is also some discussion about changes to how time is viewed in our globalised world.
One of Standing’s key points is that the precariat is a ‘dangerous’ class in that it has every potential to lead us towards a ‘politics of inferno’, particularly as politics has become commodified, there has been a ‘thinning’ of democracy, with fewer people belonging to political parties and low turnouts in most elections, and the social democratic project has been unable to survive globalisation; most mainstream political parties across Europe accepted the neo-liberal economic framework, as did the Democrats in the USA, and did little to support the precariat that grew in its shadow. Standing strongly puts forward the point that insecure people make angry people, who are prone to veer to the extreme right or extreme left politically and back populists. He mentions that the extreme right has already made inroads in many European countries. I do feel that Standing has been proved to be very prescient here, given what is currently happening with the US presidential election, and certainly Jeremy Corbyn’s election as Labour Leader would indicate that Labour Party members and supporters have rejected the Party’s acceptance of the neo-liberal framework under Blair and Brown.
In Standing’s final chapter, he sets out how we can move towards a ‘politics of paradise’ for the precariat, a key plank of which is a basic income for every citizen. I believe that he further develops his ideas on what policies would help the precariat in his later book, ‘A Precariat Charter’ (but I have not yet read this).
I cannot recommend ‘The Precariat’ highly enough for anyone who is interested in these types of issues. It is written in an engaging way and it’s fairly easy to understand. I think it’s a really important book.
Guy Standing considers that we are now in a 'tertiary time', that societies have undergone a process of 'tertiarisation'. No longer is time divided between work, play and rest. And no longer is our geography divided between workplace, home and leisure. Everything, in Zygmunt Baumann's term, has become more 'liquid', less hard-defined. And in this post-modern and thoroughly commodified era, the homogeneous classes have given way to something far more fluid, heterogeneous and potentially dangerous.
There are now essentially four classes. There is a numerically tiny super-rich elite whose relationship with the rest of humanity appears fleeting at best. Then there is the 'salariat', still maintaining their career privileges of pensions, holidays and other employment benefits. Alongside the salariat there are the professional technicians, or 'proficians' as Standing terms them. Often working as highly-paid consultants and contractors, they do not conform to the old 9 to 5, jobs-for-life pattern but move from job to job, company to company as desired/required. Below them are a dwindling number of manual workers in the older sense of the term, the former bastions of 'old labour'. And then there is the 'precariat'.
To simply say that the precariat is just 'everyone else' is unhelpful. However, it is difficult to clearly define and delineate such a heterogeneous 'class' - not least because the grouping does not recognise itself as a 'class-for-itself'. At the same time, the group is growing. It is first and foremost a result of 'commodification':
'This involves treating everything as a commodity, to be bought and sold, subject to market forces, with prices set by demand and supply, without effective 'agency' (the capacity to resist). Commodification has been extended to every aspect of life...' (P26)
Standing would, I think, agree with the sentiments expressed by Michael Sandel in his book 'What Money Can't Buy: The Moral Limits of Markets'. Everything now, it seems, can be bought and sold. The neoliberal project of marketising everything, the sweeping away of all barriers to marketability, has meant that any collective barriers to exploitation have been removed in the name of individual freedom - but the result is that if you have nothing to sell, you have no value. In the interests of the market, labour flexibility - the ability to hire and fire at will which is the ultimate commodification of labour - has been, as Standing says 'the major direct cause of the growth of the global precariat.' (P31)
This 'labour flexibility' has meant that the precariat is increasingly made up of women and older people. Both women and older people are cheaper - pushing down the real value of wages. Young people have fewer and fewer opportunities for developing skills and careers. Faced with shortages of meaningful employment, many may stay in education - but here the process of commodification means not only that education is increasingly expensive but also that the range of courses on offer is dictated more by marketing and the need to attract fee paying customers than any desire to develop human potential.
Another group forced most visibly into the precariat is, of course, migrants. The inclusion of this group illustrates the difficulty, not of defining the group, but of the class identifying itself as a class. So often migrants are used as scapegoats, accused of helping to push down wages but also as an excuse for identifying the indigenous precariat as racist:
'Capital welcomes migration because it brings low cost malleable labour. The groups most vehemently opposed to migration are the old (white) working and lower middle class, squeezed by globalisation and falling into the precariat.' (P103)
This argument is also strongly made by Owen Jones in his book 'Chavs: The Demonization of the Working Class'.
The end result of all this is a huge group of people continually scrabbling along, always on the look out for the next job, always aware that their current job may not last, always hovering between paid employment and state benefits. And too often those benefits are in reality subsidies for frankly bad employers. This precarious existence is exhausting and hugely time-consuming, making the acquisition of new skills and the development of existing ones far more difficult. And the line between legality and illegality becomes increasingly blurred too. So the class may appear feckless, unambitious, even stupid (see again Owen Jones). Which results in an increasingly 'liberal paternalist' and 'panopticon' society where the rulers 'nudge' people into what they consider to be better ways, while watching, monitoring, measuring and evaluating every move.
All this is hugely depressing but so, so accurate. And it is also, as Standing points out, so dangerous too. Many have pointed to the economic similarities between now and the 1930s. But the rise of far-right groups suggests that the parallels go further than just the economic. This diverse class, if it cannot recognise itself as a class, may be politically exploited. It is perhaps interesting to note, in this respect, the recent elections in Greece - where generally speaking the youth voted for the left-wing Syriza party and older voters supported the more conservative parties including, of course, the extreme right-wing Golden Dawn party. Similarly, the rise of the Tea Party movement in the US reflects the feelings of powerlessness and alienation of the so-called 'squeezed middle' - so squeezed that increasingly they are, of course, no longer in the middle.
Standing does, in the end, put forward some concrete proposals for not only averting the dangers inherent in this class but also for alleviating the growing hardships and deprivations experienced by it. One major strand is the provision of a 'basic income':
'The core of the proposal is that every legal resident of a country or a community, children as well as adults, should be provided with a modest monthly payment.' (P171)
This truly universal benefit would have far reaching consequences. For a start, it would mean that the precariat would actually have time - time to consider what to do next, to plan and consider and not always to be worrying about job security, about where the rent money is coming from. It would also change the nature of employment. Instead of the increasingly oppressive workfare schemes which emphasise that work - any work at all - is better than idleness, resulting in deep resentment and frustration, it would mean that employers would have to offer more than simply the minimum wage, effectively subsidised by state benefits. In fact, Standing goes on to suggest that labour should actually be even more 'commoditised'. If no-one wants the job an employer is offering, that employer will be forced to offer better wages until someone does take it, or until the employer is forced to reconsider the nature of the work on offer.
In many ways this is a pretty depressing book as I see the evidence Standing cites all around me every day. But his proposals, although initially seemingly radical and utopian (he refers to them himself as a 'Politics of Paradise') do make sense. And he has added his voice to a growing chorus of writers and thinkers who point out that the current situation is simply unsustainable, in every sense of the word.
Would you like to see more reviews about this item?
Most recent customer reviews
Look for similar items by category