Philosophy Of Science (Fundamentals of Philosophy) Paperback – 11 May 1998
- Choose from over 13,000 locations across the UK
- Prime members get unlimited deliveries at no additional cost
- Find your preferred location and add it to your address book
- Dispatch to this address when you check out
Frequently Bought Together
Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought
Enter your mobile number below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Getting the download link through email is temporarily not available. Please check back later.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
From the Author
What academic reviewers have written (and what I think):
.What academic reviewers have written (and what I think):
"Alex Birds book gives philosophical textbooks a good name. Students studying philosophy of science will be in his debt; professionals will be stimulated and provoked."
(Professor Peter Lipton, Cambridge University, writing in The British Journal of the Philosophy of Science)
"This book is part of the Fundamentals of Philosophy series, edited by John Shand, offering introductions to core areas of philosophy which are "not mere bland expositions, and as such are original pieces of philosophy in their own right". Alexander Birds book meets this remit admirably. . . He provides a single line of argument that represents an excellent introduction to the current state of thinkng in one the chief areas of human thought."
(Dr Stephen Mumford, Nottingham University, writing in Mind)
My own comments:
As these reviewers suggest, my aim in writing this book was to give a critical overview of the philosophy of science as it is currently practiced in the English-speaking world, while at the same time providing my own, unified view of the subject.
Much of this is epistemology, looking at such questions as: What can we know in science? What is it rational to believe? How do scientists use probability in their thinking? Can we know about unobservable entities? Is there a scientific method? How and why do science and scientific theories change and develop?
But much is also concerned with metaphysics, and I think my book is unusual among philosophy of science texts in having more metaphysics than most. So the first half of the book discusses questions such as: What ere laws of nature? What is explanation? How does causation relate to laws and explanation? Are there any natural kinds? To what extent does science deal with an unobservable reality?
The book introduces these questions by looking at the recent, indeed current debate over the teaching of so-called creation science in parts of the United States. Is it really a science? What makes something a science anyway?
As some of the reviewers on this page have noted, I do not deal with important questions such as the ethics of scientific research, or social problems of the application of science in technology. These are vital questions, but because they are so important they are better addressed by those with special expertise in moral and social philosophy. I hope my book will nonetheless help those who are interested in such questions by helping them see what science is about and to what extent claims to scientific knowledge are justified.
About the Author
Bird is lecturer of philosophy, University of Edinburgh. --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.
What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?
Top Customer Reviews
However, it is let down by its conventional approach. Biology is not really dealt with in depth, and the ethics of scientific inquiry, surely one of the most pressing issues in the philosophy of science today, is sadly cast aside for the sake of traditional and less relevant discussions about the Kuhn/Popper debate on scientific revolutions.
A note of warning. Bird is very biased against the Sociology of Science programme proposed by a colleague at Edinburgh University, David Bloor. The section on him ought to be read with several shakes of salt.
In short, Bird has produced a worthy primer for the student of analytic philosophy of science who has a penchant for the epistemological problems thereby provoked.
Whilst designed primarily for undergraduates, it also is excellent for those who wish to broaden their scientific knowledge or find out more about this field of science.
A great read.
Most Recent Customer Reviews
If you agree that 'science' is essentially to do with rational evidence-based reasoning, then this book, which deals with the creation of theories, justification, 'laws', aspects... Read morePublished on 7 May 2011 by Thomas Beale
this man works wonders seriously! Am at a top uni studying philosophy and missed every single lecture and seminar for my Philosophy of science unit being the idiot I am! Read morePublished on 8 May 2003 by Jenny Harly
I found the book to be most helpful in most cases. As an UG, I did not do any of the logic that was being used in the text, however many of the well known problems in the... Read morePublished on 4 Aug. 2000