To buy, select Size
Choose from options to the left

POC Joint Vpd 2.0 Knee Pad

5.0 out of 5 stars 2 customer reviews

Price: £78.46 - £103.99
Select Size Chart
Black - Uranium Black
  • Modelljahr 2016

Cycling Special with Geraint Thomas Cycling Special with Geraint Thomas

£78.46 - £103.99

Special Offers and Product Promotions

Other Product Promotions:

Product details

  • Delivery Destinations: Visit the Delivery Destinations Help page to see where this item can be delivered.
    Find out more about our Delivery Rates and Returns Policy
  • Item model number: 20374
  • ASIN: B00FDUW8L6
  • Date first available at Amazon.co.uk: 24 May 2011
  • Average Customer Review: 5.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (2 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Bestsellers Rank: 160,627 in Sports & Outdoors (See Top 100 in Sports & Outdoors)

Product Description

• Delivery: per pair • Protection zone: Knee • Type of protection: Soft • Fit: Narrow • Product specific size information: Normal Cut


What do customers buy after viewing this item?


Customer Questions & Answers

Customer Reviews

5.0 out of 5 stars
5 star
2
4 star
0
3 star
0
2 star
0
1 star
0
See both customer reviews
Share your thoughts with other customers

Top Customer Reviews

Colour Name: Black - Uranium BlackSize: Medium Verified Purchase
very stiff at first. rubbed the back of my knees for the first two or 3 rides, but stick with it as they soon soften up where it anchors to your leg. also they may feel warm for the first 5 minutes but when the moisture wicking properties take effect i dont notice them on. ive crash tested these a couple of times and they dont slide around like my worn out previous pads and offer good impact protection
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Colour Name: Black - Uranium BlackSize: Large Verified Purchase
everything is OK ~~
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse