Ornami Glamour 9ct White Gold Ladies' 5 Pt Diamond Loop Pendant

3.1 out of 5 stars 8 customer reviews

Currently unavailable.
We don't know when or if this item will be back in stock.
  • The Ornami Glamour brand includes a variety of designs from timeless classic pieces to those with a modern day contemporary twist
  • The collection is influenced by design inspiration from around the world
  • A perfect gift for yourself or that special person in your life
  • The product comes beautifully packaged in a gift box
Currently unavailable.
We don't know when or if this item will be back in stock.

Currently unavailable. We don't know when or if this item will be back in stock.

Special Offers and Product Promotions

  • Check out our Jewellery store for timeless classics to latest fashions.

  • Save on a huge selection of men's, women's and kids' jewellery and accessories in our Jewellery Deals store.

Product Specifications

Jewellery Information
Brand Name Ornami Glamour
Metal Stamp 9 ct (375)
Metal 9ct White Gold
Gem Type Diamond
Minimum Total Gem Weight 0.5 carats
Setting 4 Claw
Height 18 millimetres
Width 18 millimetres
Length 45 centimetres
Chain Curb
Clasp Type Spring Ring Clasps
Total Metal Weight 1.521 Grams
Resizable No
Number of stones 7
Stone Weight 0.5 carats
Model number Z-BP915DI
Diamond Information
Lab Created No
Stone Shape Round
Minimum Colour HI
Minimum Clarity I2
Minimum Total Carat Weight 0.5 carats

Product details

  • Boxed-product Weight: 18 g
  • Delivery Destinations: Visit the Delivery Destinations Help page to see where this item can be delivered.
    Find out more about our Delivery Rates and Returns Policy
  • Item model number: Z-BP915DI
  • ASIN: B000RPFWYC
  • Date first available at Amazon.co.uk: 21 Jun. 2007
  • Average Customer Review: 3.1 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (8 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Bestsellers Rank: 160,720 in Jewellery (See Top 100 in Jewellery)

Product Description

Product Description

Ornami Glamour 9ct White Gold Ladies' 5 Pt Diamond Loop Pendant.


Customer Questions & Answers

Customer Reviews

3.1 out of 5 stars
Share your thoughts with other customers

Top Customer Reviews

I've recently purchased this product and althought it arrived in very good time, the pendant itself is really quite small and you would probably need a magnifying glass to see the chain. Not really great value for money.
Comment 9 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
This is a very pretty pendant but it was smaller than expected. The description says 470mm but the pendant is actually only 170mm. It was bought to go with some white gold earrings I already had so the size was important. There were some tiny spots of discolouration on both the front and the back, difficult to see but there all the same. Should have returned it but never quite got round to it. All in all, a great disappointment.
Comment 3 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
By :) VINE VOICE on 15 April 2009
Verified Purchase
A lovely piece, very delicate and very well received by the recipient. Note though, the incredibly fine chain can be fiddley.
Comment 3 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Firstly, I agree with D. Hunter, this is small and it is hard to see the diamonds but it is a very nice gift. I personally think it is worth £40 (£35 when I bought it a year ago).

The chain itself is thin(ideal for ladies) and is of a suitable length.

All I can say if purchase this product if in doubt and see for yourself. You know you always have the refund promise, just sending it back at your own expense is the bad thing.
Comment 3 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse