• RRP: £20.99
  • You Save: £0.16 (1%)
FREE Delivery in the UK.
Only 1 left in stock (more on the way).
Dispatched from and sold by Amazon. Gift-wrap available.
The Nonviolent Atonement has been added to your Basket
Have one to sell?
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See all 2 images

The Nonviolent Atonement Paperback – 1 Feb 2011

See all formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price
New from Used from
Kindle Edition
"Please retry"
"Please retry"
£12.27 £16.73
Note: This item is eligible for click and collect. Details
Pick up your parcel at a time and place that suits you.
  • Choose from over 13,000 locations across the UK
  • Prime members get unlimited deliveries at no additional cost
How to order to an Amazon Pickup Location?
  1. Find your preferred location and add it to your address book
  2. Dispatch to this address when you check out
Learn more
£20.83 FREE Delivery in the UK. Only 1 left in stock (more on the way). Dispatched from and sold by Amazon. Gift-wrap available.
click to open popover

Special Offers and Product Promotions

Frequently Bought Together

  • The Nonviolent Atonement
  • +
  • The Nonviolent God
Total price: £38.82
Buy the selected items together

Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.

  • Apple
  • Android
  • Windows Phone

To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.

Product details

  • Paperback: 376 pages
  • Publisher: William B Eerdmans Publishing Co; 2nd Revised edition edition (1 Feb. 2011)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0802864376
  • ISBN-13: 978-0802864376
  • Product Dimensions: 15.2 x 2.3 x 22.9 cm
  • Amazon Bestsellers Rank: 736,900 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Product Description


The best current single volume on reconstructing the theology of atonement.
S. Mark Heim in Anglican Theological Review
Weaver provides an important contribution to atonement theories by seriously inserting the contemporary concerns of pacifist, feminist, womanist, and black theologians into the centuries-old christological conversation. . . . A provocative but faithful proposal benefiting any student of christology.
Religious Studies Review
A noteworthy contribution to the literature on the atonement. Weaver provides a useful critique of the history of atonement motifs; he does a fine job of placing Anselm s theology in its historical context; he creatively fuses a singular biblical vision from the earthly narrative of the Gospels and the cosmic perspective of the Apocalypse; and he attempts to relate discussions of the atonement to Christian social ethics.
Trinity Journal
This is a superb succinct survey and analysis of classical and contemporary theories of the atonement, ideal for students and general readers. . . . A clearly written, passionately expressed introduction to current debates on the atonement. . . . Excellent resource.
Reviews in Religion and Theology"

About the Author

Dr. J. Denny Weaver is Professor of Religion and the Harry and Jean Yoder Scholar in Bible and Religion.

Customer Reviews

There are no customer reviews yet on Amazon.co.uk.
5 star
4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star

Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta)

Amazon.com: 3.9 out of 5 stars 10 reviews
14 of 14 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Atonement Theory That Anabaptists Can Feel Good About 3 Feb. 2014
By Clif - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Kindle Edition
Atonement is a word that theologians use to describe how humans can be "at one with" God. For the Christian religion it includes tying it to the death of Jesus and explaining how it can provide spiritual salvation. The various theories of atonement that have been developed over the past two thousand years have been human endeavors at providing a rationalization as to why the execution of Jesus as a criminal has significance for Christian believers.

In this book the author, J Denny Weaver, proposes an atonement theory to which he gives the name “narrative Christus Victor”. It is an approach more consistent with the narrative descriptions of the teachings of Jesus contained in the New Testament than is the theory that has prevailed since the year 1100 when Anselm’s satisfaction theory of atonement was published in his Cur Deus Homo.

Anselm developed his satisfaction atonement in order to replace the then prevailing view that Christ's death was a ransom payment that God owed to the devil. This ransom theory is the classic Christus Victor and most theologians didn't like the emphasis on the power of the devil to interact with God as an equal.

The problem with Anselm’s satisfaction theory of atonement is that it is based on the idea of retributive violence. Christians are not supposed to practice retributive violence so why must God? Isn’t it strange that a God who sent his Son to teach “love your enemies” is incapable (as described by Anselm) of simply forgiving sins without the use of retributive violence? However, the satisfaction theory of atonement was widely accepted by the Christian church during the medieval era because it was compatible with a state church that was part of the government that needed to use "the sword" to maintain social order.

Abelard came along a few years after Anselm with his moral influence theory of atonement in an effort to avoid the retributive aspects of the satisfaction theory. But the death of Jesus still has aspects of divine child abuse in the exercise of moral influence in Abelard's theory. With the devil missing from the equation it's hard to explain why the death of Jesus was needed. Also, narrative Christus Victor differs from the moral influence atonement by envisioning changes other than an impact on the mind of the sinner by envisioning a change in the spiritual universe symbolized by Christ's resurrection.

Narrative Christus Victor puts a devil or sorts back into the equation again as was the case for classic Christus Victor. But the devil in narrative Christus Victor is in the form of the very tangible and real principalities and powers of this world that are opposed to God's kingdom. The post-Constantine state church of the Medieval era could not recognize this definition of the devil because they themselves were the principalities and powers.

In Weaver’s narrative Christus Victor there is no need to explain why God required that Jesus die:

(Begin Quotation)
“In narrative Christus Victor, the cause of Jesus’ death is obviously not God. ... Rather, in narrative Christus Victor the Son is carrying out the father’s will by making the reign of God visible in the world — and that mission is so threatening to the world that sinful human beings and the accumulation of evil they represent conspire to kill Jesus. Jesus came not to die but to live, to witness to the reign of god in human history. While he may have known that carrying out that mission would provoke inevitably fatal opposition his purpose was not to get himself killed. ... Jesus depicted in narrative Christus Victor is no passive victim. He is an active participant in confronting evil. Salvation happens when or because Jesus carried out his mission to make the reign of God visible. His saving life shows how the reign of god confronts evil, and is thus our model for confronting injustice. While we do not save, we participate in salvation and in Jesus’ saving work when we join in the reign of God and live the way Jesus lived. ... It means actively confronting injustice, and in that confrontation we continue with Jesus to make the rule of God visible in a world where evil still has sway. “ (p.211-212)
(End Quotation)

Weaver deliberately builds his narrative Christus Victor model by careful examination of scriptures and history -- Revelation, the Gospels, letters of the apostle Paul, Old Testament sacrifice traditions, the book of Hebrews, and Israel's history. In summary Weaver says:

(Begin Quotation)
"Seeing narrative Christus Victor in this long historical context underscores how completely outside of history satisfaction atonement is. If fact, satisfaction atonement appears to reduce the life of Jesus to an elaborate scheme whose purpose was to produce his death. Narrative Christus Victor is a way of reading the entire history of God's people, with the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus as the culminating revelation of the reign of God in history, whereas the various versions of satisfaction atonement concern a legal construct or an abstract formula that functions outside of and apart from history. Seeing the long historical context of narrative Christus Victor underscores the extent to which satisfaction atonement is separated from ethical involvements and allows oppression to continue without challenge." (p.69)
(End Quotation)

Narrative Christus Victor is compatible with much of René Girard's theory about mimetic violence and its implications for understanding the death of Jesus and atonement theology. Narrative Christus Victor also stands in continuity with, but differs significantly from, the classic view of Christus Victor described by Gustaf Aulén, and it bears little resemblance to the Christus Victor rejected by Feminist Theology.

Weaver includes chapters in his book explaining how narrative Christus Victor addresses the concerns of and is compatible with "Black Theology on atonement", "Feminist Theology on Atonement", and "Womanist Theology of Atonement." Much of Christian theology, classic atonement images, and christological terminology have accommodated violence of the sword, slavery, racism, and violence against women. Even though Weaver originally developed narrative Christus Victor model to reflect a nonviolent ethic for Christian living, he demonstrates that it fits well with the concerns of oppressed people.

This book has a chapter near its end titled,"Conversation with Anselm and His Defenders." A number of theologians have tried to respond to the criticisms of satisfaction atonement that have been expressed by feminist and womanist writers. The defenders have generally responded in one of three ways: (1) Rehabilitate the ideas of punishment and vicarious suffering, (2) Shift emphasis away from punishment by recovering additional themes and emphases within satisfaction that have been covered over by too much stress on punishment, and (3) Acknowledge the validity of the critique of punishment by blaming the excesses on Protestant reformers such as John Calvin. Weaver concludes that none of the defenses are adequate or convincing.
10 of 12 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Best book on the Atonement that I have found 31 Jan. 2013
By 2 kids and a dog - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Kindle Edition Verified Purchase
This book was used in a class I was in. I found it so profound I bought a second copy and send it to my grandmother. It brings the life, death, and resurrection of Christ into continuity. It's brilliantly written and easy to read. I highly recommend this.
9 of 11 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Finally, an atonement theory that makes sense. 2 Nov. 2012
By Jay D. Weaver - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Kindle Edition Verified Purchase
I am not yet finished with the book, but I am really engrossed in it. For me as an anabaptist, who believes in a loving God, this approach makes a lot of sense.
5 of 6 people found the following review helpful
3.0 out of 5 stars First Reactions 6 Jun. 2014
By B. Burkholder - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Paperback
This is a provocative work, and in the 2nd edition, Weaver addresses his critics who have responded to his former version. However, there are plenty of deductions made that should not be allowed to carry as much weight as Weaver places on them. For example, Weaver dismisses many counterarguments and much counterevidence by simply asserting that Jesus’ nonviolence reveals the true nature of God. I would not contest the revelatory nature of Jesus, but the Gospels tell us a good deal more about Jesus than that he responded with love and forgiveness. They have him saying many things, and some of it pronounces violence on those who reject him. Nevertheless, I think the more challenging statements for Weaver’s thesis come at the Last Supper where Jesus suggests his death is a covenant sacrifice. If the atonement is “nonviolent” then why does Matthew have Jesus saying “… this is my blood of the covenant, which is poured out for many for the forgiveness of sins” (Matt. 26:28). If Jesus truly reveals God’s nature, how can it be so quickly taken to be a “nonviolent atonement,” especially when there are several things that would undermine his entire portrait of the atonement? The portrait of Jesus in the Gospels is hardly free of the notion of a “violent” God.

Read the book. It is one of the better articulations of the “nonviolent” atonement theories, but do read it with a view toward the evidence. Moreover, if you get the chance, I would read the critics too! In several places, it does not seem that Weaver has truly been able to blunt the force of some of their criticisms, but you won’t see that from reading this book because Weaver seems more interested in observing the differences between his critics and himself than truly refuting their points of view. To truly understand the conversation, you’ll have to engage both sides and then ask yourself who has the better argument.
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars This book is a great summary of many of the other books on this topic. 17 Nov. 2015
By Jeremy Myers - Writing at RedeemingGod - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
I am a proponent of a nonviolent atonement and have written much on the topic, and so was excited to read this book.

I was quickly disturbed to find, however, that the book is little more than one long summary of a bunch of other books on the atonement, many of which I had already read.

In other words, J. Denny Weaver's approach in this book is that he read a bunch of books on the atonement, and then wrote 5-10 pages summarizing the views and arguments of each book, which are then all compiled into this book on the atonement. You can see this simply by looking at the footnotes throughout the book.

So, for example, almost all of the footnotes from pages 52-56 comes from Beker's book, <em>Paul the Apostle</em>. Then page 57 picks up with a summary of Raymund Schwager's book, <em>Jesus in the Drama</em>, followed by Brondos' book, <em>Paul on the Cross</em>, on pages 61-66.

This pattern pretty much continues throughout the book.

Yes, Weaver comments on the strengths and weaknesses of each book, and provides his own insights as well, all of which are helpful, but for me, the "survey of books on the subject" approach to writing makes for very dull reading.

However, if you are brand new to the subject of a nonviolent atonement, a book like this might be just what you are looking for to introduce you to the various views and available authors which are out there in this important topic.
Were these reviews helpful? Let us know

Look for similar items by category