• RRP: £22.55
  • You Save: £0.13 (1%)
FREE Delivery in the UK.
Only 2 left in stock (more on the way).
Dispatched from and sold by Amazon. Gift-wrap available.
NEOCONSERVATISM has been added to your Basket

Dispatch to:
To see addresses, please
Or
Please enter a valid UK postcode.
Or
+ £2.80 UK delivery
Used: Like New | Details
Condition: Used: Like New
Comment: Book Ships From Los Angeles, USA. Please up to 21 days for delivery. Like New Copy. Over 500,000 Amazon Orders Shipped....Buy With Confidence! Orders may be subject to taxes/duties which are determined by country upon arrival.
Have one to sell?
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See all 2 images

NEOCONSERVATISM Hardcover – 20 Jun 2010

3.5 out of 5 stars 2 customer reviews

See all 5 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price
New from Used from
Kindle Edition
"Please retry"
Hardcover
"Please retry"
£22.42
£15.36 £13.91
Note: This item is eligible for click and collect. Details
Pick up your parcel at a time and place that suits you.
  • Choose from over 13,000 locations across the UK
  • Prime members get unlimited deliveries at no additional cost
How to order to an Amazon Pickup Location?
  1. Find your preferred location and add it to your address book
  2. Dispatch to this address when you check out
Learn more

Man Booker International Prize 2017
A Horse Walks Into a Bar has won the Man Booker International Prize 2017. Learn more
£22.42 FREE Delivery in the UK. Only 2 left in stock (more on the way). Dispatched from and sold by Amazon. Gift-wrap available.
click to open popover

Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.

  • Apple
  • Android
  • Windows Phone

To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.



Product details

  • Hardcover: 256 pages
  • Publisher: Routledge; 1 edition (20 Jun. 2010)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 1594518319
  • ISBN-13: 978-1594518317
  • Product Dimensions: 16.2 x 2.6 x 23.4 cm
  • Average Customer Review: 3.5 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (2 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Bestsellers Rank: 2,262,278 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
  • If you are a seller for this product, would you like to suggest updates through seller support?

  • See Complete Table of Contents

Product description

Review

"I just started on the book and am blown away by it. I knew much of it already but the careful, measured and cumulative explanation of its intellectual roots and political consequences makes it a must-read."
―Andrew Sullivan, The Atlantic

"This book is a must-read for all Americans interested in defending the founding fathers’ vision of a free and just society."
―GLENN BECK

“A novel and riveting account. . .that traces a tight arc from Leo Strauss through Irving Kristol to the daily travails of Washington politics.”
―RICHARD EPSTEIN, University of Chicago

"A brilliant and important book that substantially enlarges our understanding of the neoconservative phenomenon.”
―A. JAMES REICHLEY, Brookings Institution

"This book treats the neoconservatives, Strauss, and other relevant matters with a degree of respect and intellectual care we do not find in other like-minded texts. I disagree with just about every one of the conclusions here, but the book clearly makes the best case yet made for them, and gives those of us who disagree a worthy target."
―MICHAEL ZUCKERT, University of Notre Dame

"C. Bradley Thompson and Yaron Brook delve deeply into the origin, arc, and current nature of the neoconservative movement in the United States. Brilliant, deep, and told with authority."
―THOM HARTMANN, Air America Radio Network host

About the Author

C. Bradley Thompson is the BB&T Research Professor in the Department of Political Science at Clemson University and the Executive Director of the Clemson Institute for the Study of Capitalism. He is the author of the award-winning John Adams and the Spirit of Liberty. He is also the editor of The Revolutionary Writings of John Adams and Antislavery Political Writings, 1833-1860: A Reader. Yaron Brook is executive director of the Ayn Rand Institute. He appears regularly on national TV and radio to discuss business, economic, and foreign policy issues. He has written and spoken extensively on U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East and on the role of neoconservatives in formulating that policy.

Customer Reviews

3.5 out of 5 stars
5 star
1
4 star
0
3 star
0
2 star
1
1 star
0
See both customer reviews
Share your thoughts with other customers

Top Customer Reviews

Format: Hardcover Verified Purchase
In the Introduction to `Neoconservatism: An Obituary for an Idea`, C. Bradley Thompson and Yaron Brook declare:

"Let us be clear: We do not treat neoconservatism as a conspiracy or a cabal (readers of this book will find no flowcharts starting at some office at the University of Chicago, moving through apartments in New York City, and ending in some dark bunker in the White House), but rather as an imporatant intellectual and political movement that deserves to be taken seriously".

This book keeps its promises. Thompson and Brook absolutely deserve to be commended for what they have done here. We have seen far too much in the way of trashy literature claiming to `expose' the neoconservative movement. `Neocon', unfortunately, has become an overused, misunderstood term tossed around as an insult by the clueless left, who have little idea what it actually means. Most often, it is just used as a label for American right-wingers in general. Most disturbing, however, is the level of anti-Semitism that has sneaked into the discussion, with far-left magazines like Adbusters actually putting stars next to the names of Jews on a list of known neoconservatives. Few incidents exposed the moral decline and intellectual bankruptcy of today's left-wing, if it ever held any moral high ground and intellectual quality in the first place. Such nonsense obfuscates the real issues, and scares sensible people away from honestly grappling with neoconservatism.

Thompson is a former neoconservative sympathizer who drifted towards the libertarian side of the philosophical spectrum, while Brook, whom I have seen a couple of times on his UK visits, is executive director of the Ayn Rand Institute and a prominent Objectivist spokesperson.
Read more ›
Comment 3 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Format: Hardcover Verified Purchase
This extraordinary book is a delicious example (I think it’s a delicious example, but as with everything about neoconservatism, and indeed neoliberalism too, one is almost by definition never certain) of the smoke-and-mirrors, now-you-see-it-now-you-don’t, once I was a commy, now I’m the world’s greatest standalone free-marketeer trail along which so many have trudged their rather predictable way between post-war consensus and rabid 1980s individualism, having seen the Platonic light. Had this extremely learned and very well-written book been penned by a moderate left-of-centre political theorist, it would have been a coherent and much-needed critique from someone whose political stance allowed us to judge their writing: I wholeheartedly agree with Thompson’s view (p 227) that ‘the neoconservatives are the advocates of a new managerial State – a State controlled and regulated by a new mandarin class of conservative virtucrats who think the American people are incapable of governing themselves without the help of [their] wisdom [and] who want to regulate virtually all areas of human thought and action’. (Naturally apart from bemoaning their very existence he has nothing to say on staying or reversing the neoconservative-neoliberal near-whole-world consensus.) The chilling creepiness one feels reading this book stems from the foggy nature of the political views of the authors, at least as expressed here. I say unknown, but it doesn’t take much digging to divine what’s really going on: although Clemson University (C Bradley Thompson’s current academic home) seems a standard vanilla US university of some repute, the home of the author of one ‘fabulous’ (according to his co-author) chapter (Yaron Brook) is executive director of the Ayn Rand Institute.Read more ›
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse

Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta) (May include reviews from Early Reviewer Rewards Program)

Amazon.com: 4.4 out of 5 stars 11 reviews
8 of 8 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars An Essential Elucidation of a Cryptic Ideology 10 Jan. 2013
By Dennis B. Mulcare - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Hardcover Verified Purchase
Prior to reading this book, I had loosely considered neoconservatism to be rehash of 20th century Democratic Party foreign policy. Similarly, I had considered Big Government Conservatism to be merely a repackaging of Rockefeller Republicanism. Neoconservatism - An Obituary for an Idea has profoundly altered those views, and did so in a very systematic, comprehensive, and plausible manner. My former lazy notion that the term neoconservatism was simply "hype" has now been laid to rest.

Lest one categorize this book as strictly a political account, the author states his primary focus to be "the philosophical essence of neoconservatism" (p. 6). Although there is also ample illustrative treatment of its contemporary political manifestations, emphasis on the underlying philosophical bases for neoconservatism serves to establish and characterize its ideological credentials. In consequence, the pivotal element in the neoconservative creed, as expropriated largely from Leo Strauss, is seen to be a somewhat tortured synthesis of Platonic idealism and Machiavellian realism. This reduces to "Platonic ends achieved by Machiavellian means" (p. 227).

Given the dubious if not unpalatable core tenets of neoconservatism, it is not surprising that its proponents/practitioners are evasive or disingenuous regarding its nature/goals. "They resist any attempt to...identify or define...their views" (p.15), which is mainly why this book is so important. In part, neocons obscure its ideological nature, strategies, and doctrine via a two-level formulation that distinguishes a purportedly wise and beneficent ruling elite (theory level) from an inherently base citizenry (practice level). Here, the ruling elite is composed of philosophers, their specially trained statesman, and to some extent by their surrogates. In turn, the allegedly hapless citizens are subsumed into the pitiable organic whole of society, which must be managed by the ruling elite primarily for the good of the state.

The neocon ideological doctrine/strategies per se are shown to be strictly the esoteric province of the philosophers and their anointed statesman. The intended homogenous society is then privy to just exoteric propaganda, directives, obligations, and constraints that are bestowed on it, primarily for the good of the governing state. Secondarily, society is held to benefit by its relegation to a managed collective life granted unto it by the all-knowing/all-controlling state. Welcome to the "new managerial State" (p. 226).

In all, appreciable detail and disturbing implications of the neocon ideology are convincingly explicated in the book. In consequence, the thrust of this ideological formulation is shown necessarily to entail the demise of the traditional/constitutional form of US governance as well as the repudiation of the principles of American conservatism per se. Ultimately, the underlying premises and the consolidated esoteric doctrine of neoconservatism would seem to be wholly repugnant and fatuous to all traditional Americans and to all persons who value liberty and the rights of individual citizens.

To render the author's characterization and analysis of the neoconservative ideology more tangible, there are ample illustrations of neocon influence at the highest levels of government, mainly through leverage within the Republican Party. Perhaps the most significant is the neocon domination of President George Bush's foreign policy, notably with regard to the Iraqi War. After their decisive role in initiating the war, the neocons enacted an indecisive mode of conducting it: foolishly restrictive rules of engagement; the policy of not pursuing outright military victory; and largely free reign for the Iraqis to disdain our "benevolence" following the war. This prominent exercise in orthodox neocon foreign policy is also examined in Claes Ryn's The New Jacobinism.

Many thanks to Professor Thompson for his thoughtful, thorough, and compelling examination of neocon ideology, and his exemplification of neoconservatism in practice. It probably took as much fortitude as scholarly endeavor to expose the actual nature and ends of this powerful and pervasive ideology. The insights he offers render the interpretation and understanding of Washington politics much clearer. Accordingly, my observations of the failures and dysfunction there are now rather less perplexing. To wit: the counter-productive results issuing from Washington are largely explainable in terms of the common goals of both the progressives AND the neocons. In the words of their prophet and godfather Irving Kristol, neocons seek "liberal ends...achieved through conservative means" (p. 26).
5 of 5 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars Courageous Whistleblower 22 Jun. 2011
By D. Foley - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Hardcover Verified Purchase
Up to this point I have found 2 types of documents to help me expose the "Masters of Deceit" in the so-called Neoconservative movement. One, of course, is the writings of those who admit to being leaders in the movement -- like Irving Kristol. The second is careful researchers like Dr. Ron Paul and the Publisher of The New American magazine, John F. McManus.

But C. Bradley Thompson is a third type of source -- a long-time Neoconservative himself -- who became disgusted with the deceit involved and decided to blow the whistle on all his Neoconservative friends and associates in this heavily documented book. He tells us the purpose for his book right up front: "I have written this book to alert Americans -- and especially those who value our nation's founding principles -- to the threat posed to this country by neoconservatism,

And on the very last page he charges the Neoconservatives with being "the false prophets of Americanism" and "America's Trojan Horse".

After studying this book by C. Bradley Thompson, I (1) appreciate his honesty, and (2) urge all Americans to learn from this courageous whistleblower that "Neoconservatives" should be more properly be called "pretend conservatives" -- those who seek to lead their own opposition so that can throw the game to those who want to promote socialism and expansionism. (Experience has shown us that we can't afford either -- and that having bases all around the globe creates resentment in other nations. How would we feel if some foreign country established permanent military bases in Florida, for example?)

DonFolkers@gwi.net Dartmouth '59
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Excellent Analysis of What's Wrong With Conservatism 20 Jan. 2014
By Anders Ingemarson - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Hardcover Verified Purchase
This is an extremely valuable book for anybody who wants to understand the lack of a principled defense of capitalism, individual rights and a rational morality in the conservative movement.
10 of 13 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars A dangerous ideology exposed 30 Aug. 2010
By Wayne Dynes - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Hardcover Verified Purchase
Since Thompson (an academic who teaches as Clemson University) was formerly a foot soldier in the neocon army, this is a "breaking-ranks" book, somewhat reminiscence of the Cold War classic "The God That Failed" (1949).

As the authors acknowledge, the obituary is somewhat premature, but with the debacles in Iraq and Afghanistan, both heavily backed by the neocons, they are clearly losing ground. "Neoconservatism: An Obituary for an Idea" seeks to expose what the neocons call their philosophy of governance--their plan for governing America. Studying the texts with great tenacity, the authors provide the most subtle analysis I have seen of the complex connections that link the neocons with their guru, the University of Chicago professor Leo Strauss, who died in 1973. Thompson and Brooks believe that the claims of the neocons to support American interests are a sham, and that the movement is actually a species of anti-Americanism. In fact, the supporters of the trend show little enthusiasm for the traditions of the American founding. In this vein they ridicule the aspirations to limited government that libertarians and many paleoconservatives derive from this heritage. Instead, they favor big government, providing that, in their wisdom, they can somehow pull the levers of power. In this aim they do not shrink, according to Thompson and Brook, from advocating the deployment of fraud and force. Despising the masses, these elitists believe that the herd of ordinary folks, who are incapable of any philosophical dimension, must be controlled by propagating "noble lies" among them, especially those rooted in religion. Although many, probably most of the neocons are of Jewish extraction, they are typically nonobservant.

Because of their elitism and deviousness, Thompson and Brook conclude that the neocon program is crypto-fascist. This is a serious charge, but the writers support their contention by showing Leo Strauss's connection with Carl Schmitt and Martin Heidegger, both later implicated with Nazism, and his admiration for Mussolini.

Largely absent from the book is any discussion of the pronounced turn of the neocons towards defending the state of Israel, even when its interests diverge from those of the United States. They do not discuss the key neocon paper of 1998, "A Clean Break," produced for Benjamin Netanyahu and urging an invasion of Iraq. Having infiltrated the Bush administration, they were able to implement this disastrous idea in 2003. The omission of the Israeli connection is curious, because Yaron Brook is in fact an Israeli, though he has lived in the US for a good many years. Evidently, the omission of this major theme reflects a deliberate decision on the part of the authors.

Early on in the book, the authors make a significant blooper when they relocate the famous cafeteria Alcove One (where a number of individuals met who were to become key neocons) from City College in Upper Manhattan to Brooklyn College (p. 16).

More worrisome, though, is the fact that both authors profess to be admirers of Ayn Rand. Yaron Brook is in fact the executive director of the Ayn Rand Institute. (He must not be confused with the journalist David Brooks, who receives many hard knocks in the course of the volume.) On the whole, however, Thompson and Brooks keep their eye on the ball, and the Randian element is not obtrusive.

These criticisms notwithstanding, this appears to be the weightiest analysis of neonconservatism yet published. Regrettably, this noxious movement is not dead yet, but incisive interventions like the one in this book should hasten its demise.
26 of 30 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars A must conservative or liberal read 19 July 2010
By Ashley T. King - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Hardcover Verified Purchase
This book was an eye-opener: little did I know of the illiberal philosophical roots of neoconservatism. Thompson and Brook provide first-class scholarship on Leo Strauss, the philosopher of neoconservatives such as Irving Kristol, showing Strauss' sympathy with Italian fascism. Who would have known that a cadre of talented Machiavellian Platonists could have insinuated themselves into the conservative movement and there substantially redefined conservative domestic and foreign policies. It is shocking to find how deep is neocon antipathy to the Jeffersonian, natural rights, Enlightenment roots of the United States.

Conservatives who consider the founding fathers their touchstone must read this book. Liberals curious about the roots of these influential thinkers in the conservative ranks must read this book.
Were these reviews helpful? Let us know