Currently unavailable.
We don't know when or if this item will be back in stock.

Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon

Moulinex Vitapress Citrus Press

5.0 out of 5 stars 1 customer review

Currently unavailable.
We don't know when or if this item will be back in stock.
  • ◦30 Watt Citrus Press
  • ◦0.6 Litre transparent graduated bowl
  • ◦'Effipress' Double Rotation system
  • ◦Anti-Splash

 get baking  get baking

Currently unavailable. We don't know when or if this item will be back in stock.

Special Offers and Product Promotions


Product Information

Technical Details
Brand Moulinex
ColourWhite
  
Additional Information
ASINB005ZCARZ6
Best Sellers Rank 1,219,428 in Kitchen & Home (See top 100)
Delivery Destinations:Visit the Delivery Destinations Help page to see where this item can be delivered.
Date First Available25 Oct. 2011
  
 

Product Description

Handy and stylish citrus press from the new Moulinex range



Customer Questions & Answers

Customer Reviews

5.0 out of 5 stars
5 star
1
4 star
0
3 star
0
2 star
0
1 star
0
See the customer review
Share your thoughts with other customers

Top Customer Reviews

Well I wanted a juicer and I went and got one, and not only that but I'm writing it up like I'm Ernest Hemingway or something. Well OK, I'm not, but I think at least it deserves a little literary attention, after the 139 reviews heaped on the Philips HR2737/70, the 22 of the KitchenCraft Lemon Reamer, and the 17 of the Braun Citromatic MP29... This one is I think neater than the Philips or the Braun (the most similar designs). It juices fast without much pressure. It's easy to take apart, dispose of the pulp, and clean. It pours nicely. It doesn't splash. There's even an outside possibility that, with the jar removed, it could be used as a love toy. I haven't tried this but just mention it for those who seek polyvalence in their kitchen equipment.
Comment 3 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse