Buy Used
£4.87
FREE Delivery on orders over £10.
Condition: Used: Good
Comment: GOOD CONDITION, SOME SLIGHT CREASES,Eligible For Amazon''s FREE Super Saver/Prime Shipping, 24/7 Customer Service, and package tracking.
Have one to sell?
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming Paperback – 6 Jun 2011

4.1 out of 5 stars 25 customer reviews

See all formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price
New from Used from
Kindle Edition
"Please retry"
Paperback, 6 Jun 2011
£368.22 £2.43
click to open popover

Special Offers and Product Promotions

Enter your mobile number below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Getting the download link through email is temporarily not available. Please check back later.

  • Apple
  • Android
  • Windows Phone

To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.




Product details

  • Paperback: 368 pages
  • Publisher: Bloomsbury Publishing PLC; UK open market ed edition (6 Jun. 2011)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 1408824663
  • ISBN-13: 978-1408824665
  • Product Dimensions: 15.3 x 2.5 x 23.4 cm
  • Average Customer Review: 4.1 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (25 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Bestsellers Rank: 824,101 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Product Description

Review

Naomi Oreskes and Erik Conway have demonstrated what many of us have long suspected: that the debate' over the climate crisis--and many other environmental issues--was manufactured by the same people who brought you safe' cigarettes. Anyone concerned about the state of democracy in America should read this book. "Former Vice President Al Gore, author of An Inconvenient Truth"

As the science of global warming has grown more certain over the last two decades, the attack on that science has grown more shrill; this volume helps explain that paradox, and not only for climate change. A fascinating account of a very thorny problem. "Bill McKibben, author of Eaarth: Making a Life on a Tough New Planet"

Naomi Oreskes and Erik Conway have written an important and timely book. "Merchants of Doubt "should finally put to rest the question of whether the science of climate change is settled. It is, and we ignore this message at our peril. "Elizabeth Kolbert, author of Field Notes from a Catastrophe: Man, Nature, and Climate Change"

There can be no science without doubt: brute dogma leaves no room for inquiry. But over the last half century, a tiny minority of scientists have wielded doubt as a political weapon to halt what they did not want said: that tobacco kills or that the climate is warming because of what we humans are doing. Doubt is our product' read a tobacco memo--and indeed, millions of dollars have gone into creating the impression of scientific controversy where there has not been one. This book about the politics of doubt by Naomi Oreskes and Erik M. Conway explores the long, connected, and intentional obfuscation of science by manufactured controversy. It is clear, scientifically responsible, and historically compelling--it is an essential and passionate book about our times. "Peter Galison, Joseph Pellegrino University Professor, Harvard University, author of Einstein's Clocks, Poincare's Maps"

With the carefulness of historians and the skills of master storytellers, Naomi Oreskes and Erik M. Conway lay out the sordid history of tobacco industry protectionists, who framed the debate as scientifically unproven, ' gaining decades of market share for those merchants of death--who knew all along the risks of their products. "Merchants of Doubt" shows that some of the very same individuals were part of the plans to frame the climate change debate as unproven, using the same tried and true tactics of misrepresentation of facts, non-representative scientists, and industry-friendly legislators. Again, tried and true public re-framing of reality worked. But now all this chicanery is exposed for the deception it has been in Oreskes and Conway's powerful and timely work. "Stephen H. Schneider, Professor, Stanford University, author of Science as a Contact Sport: Inside the Battle to Save Earth's Climate"

A well-documented, pulls-no-punches account of how science works and how political motives can hijack the process by which scientific information is disseminated to the public. "Kirkus Reviews"

Sweeping and comprehensive Oreskes and Conway do an excellent job of bringing to life a complex and important environmental battle [a] darkly fascinating history "Merchants of Doubt" is an important book. How important? If you read just one book on climate change this year, read "Merchants of Doubt." And if you have time to read two, reread "Merchants of Doubt." "Grist.org"

Oreskes and Conway tell an important story This book deserves serious attention for the lessons it provides about the misuse of science for political and commercial ends. "Publishers Weekly (starred review)"

Naomi Oreskes and Erik Conway smoke out the "Merchants of Doubt." "Vanity Fair"

In their impeccably researched genealogy of denialism "Merchants of Doubt," Conway and Oreskes show that a key group of figures in global warming denial earned their spurs in tobacco-industry-funded attempts to discredit the links between smoking and cancer. "New Humanist"

Brilliantly reported and written with brutal clarity The real shocker of this book is that it takes us, in just 274 brisk pages, through seven scientific issues that called for decisive government regulation and didn't get it, sometimes for decades, because a few scientists sprinkled doubt-dust in the offices of regulators, politicians and journalists Oreskes and Conway do a great public service. "Huffington Post"

In their fascinating and important study, "Merchants of Doubt," Naomi Oreskes and Erik M. Conway offer convincing evidence for a surprising and disturbing thesis. Opposition to scientifically well-supported claims about the dangers of cigarette smoking, the difficulties of the Strategic Defense Initiative ("Star Wars"), the effects of acid rain, the existence of the ozone hole, the problems caused by secondhand smoke, and--ultimately--the existence of anthropogenic climate change was used in the service of political goals and commercial interests' to obstruct the transmission to the American public of important information Because it is so thorough in disclosing how major policy decisions have been delayed or distorted, "Merchants of Doubt" deserves a wide readership. It is tempting to require that all those engaged in the business of conveying scientific information to the general public should read it. "Science"

"Merchants of Doubt," by the science historian Naomi Oreskes and the writer Erik Conway, investigates a sort of reverse conspiracy theory: ecoterrorists and socialists are not the ones foisting dubious science upon us; rather it is deniers who are running their own well-funded and organized long-term hoax. Several previous works have ably illuminated similar themes, but this one hits bone [Merchants of Doubt] provide[s] both the historical perspective and the current political insights needed to get a grip on what is happening now. "OnEarth"

All in all, Oreskes and Conway paint an unflattering picture of why some scientists continue to stand against the overwhelming scientific consensus on issues at the center of public discussion. "USA Today"

Ever wonder how the terms liberty and freedom got all tangled up in fake science, how industry friendly think-tanks got their start, or what motivates scientists to sell out beyond the obvious? "Merchants of Doubt" expertly follows the historical twists and turns to answer all those questions and more in exquisite detail translated into entertaining narratives easily digested by readers from all backgrounds This book should be a staple for any scientist and progressive, especially those whose work intersects public policy. "Merchants of Doubt" will not only leave you better equipped to combat the propaganda now packaged and fed to an unsuspecting public as legitimate science on a daily basis, it is a meticulously researched and wonderfully written. "Daily Kos"

The disturbing tale of how some scientists sell their souls to advance political and economic agendas. "Pittsburgh Post-Gazette"

Powerful. "Economist"

After enduring decades of inexplicably persistent news reports casting doubt on the fact that cigarettes cause lung cancer, pollution harms the planet, and nuclear weapons are extremely dangerous, one might be forgiven for wondering if the same mob of misguided mercenaries might be behind them all. As it turns out--according to the evidence assembled in "Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming"--they are. "Chronicle of Higher Education"

A devastating portrayal of organized scientific disinformation campaigns that makes clear just how gullible the press, scientific community and the public have been (and to a large extent, continue to be). "Capital Weather Gang/WashingtonPost.com"

Well-researched and lucidly written. "Washington Times"

Excellent. "America Magazine"

An important book The next time a friend or Fox News commentator or political candidate assaults you with the claim that climate change isn't happening or isn't caused by human activities, ' you will recognize the source of their colossal misunderstanding. The good news is, honest science wins in the end. The bad news: The earth is heating up while this artificially heated debate rages, though "Merchants of Doubt," if widely read, should help douse the media flames. "Minneapolis Star Tribune"

"Merchants of Doubt" might be one of the most important books of the year. Exhaustively researched and documented, it explains how over the past several decades mercenary scientists have partnered with tobacco companies and chemical corporations to help them convince the public that their products are safe even when solid science proves otherwise "Merchants of Doubt" is a hefty read, well-researched and comprehensive I hope it sells, because what it has to say needs to be heard. "Christian Science Monitor"

Ever wonder how the terms "liberty" and "freedom" got all tangled up in fake science, how industry friendly think-tanks got their start, or what motivates scientists to sell out beyond the obvious? "Merchants of Doubt" expertly follows the historical twists and turns to answer all those questions and more in exquisite detail translated into entertaining narratives easily digested by readers from all backgrounds This book should be a staple for any scientist and progressive, "especially" those whose work intersects public policy. "Merchants of Doubt" will not only leave you better equipped to combat the propaganda now packaged and fed to an unsuspecting public as legitimate science on a daily basis, it is a meticulously researched and wonderfully written. "Austin Science Policy Examiner"

No mere summary or review could hope to do more than scratch the surface of the information contained in this book "Merchants of Doubt" [is] so compelling that it cannot be dismissed with a mere "talk to the hand." The facts cannot be denied any longer no free markets can address clearly market failures like acid rain and global warming, and ignoring reality only works for so long before reality finally does something that simply cannot be ignored. "Scholars and Rogues"

Oreskes and Conway--through a combination of thorough scholarly research and adept story telling--unravel deep common links to past environmental and public health controversies among those now most often identified as climate "skeptics," "contrarians," "deniers," "doubters" and more. What makes their new book from Bloomsbury Press particularly worthwhile at a time of no shortage of new and intriguing climate change books? It's their combination of thorough research with writing reminiscent of the best investigative journalism (remember that?) essential reading for anyone seriously wanting to understand the tawdry background of climate science politicization as it was targeted, in particular, at some of the individual scientists and scientific undertakings most respected by the established science academy. "Yale Forum on Climate Change"

The eye-opener of the year. "Head Butler"

Fascinating "Merchants" is an impressive and disturbing piece of scholarship that does a good job of answering the questions [the authors] pose. It should be read by every editor and every member of Congress, and by climate scientists as well. "Climate Progress"

Historians a thousand years from now may wonder what went wrong: How, after scholars had so thoroughly nailed down the reality of anthropogenic climate change, did so many Americans get fooled into thinking it was all a left-wing hoax? Naomi Oreskes and Erik M. Conway give us some very good--if disturbing--answers in their fascinating, detailed and artfully written new book, "Merchants of Doubt "There is much in this book to outrage anyone who cares about the future of the planet, human health, or scientific integrity. "American Scientist"

If you really needed any more reasons to dislike the campaign against dealing with climate change, this book will supply it. "Daily Kos"

Eye-opening "Merchants of Doubt" is alarming, yet important. "American Biology Teacher"

Investigates a sort of reverse conspiracy theory: ecoterrorists and socialists are not the ones foisting dubious science upon us; rather it is deniers who are running their own well-funded and organized long-term hoax. Several previous works have ably illuminated similar themes, but this one hits bone. "SustainableBusiness.com"

Oreskes and Conway outline how science is supposed to work and how some critical evidence has been drowned out of the U.S. public discourse. An important study about science and the media that informed citizens need to read. "Library Journal"

The authors explain in exhaustively-researched detail how renowned scientists abandon science, how environmentalism has become equated with communism, and how the Cold War has come to be connected with climate denial A must read. "Earth Gauge"" --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.

Book Description

The troubling story of how a cadre of influential scientists have clouded public understanding of scientific facts to advance a political and economic agenda. --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.

See all Product Description

Customer Reviews

Top Customer Reviews

Format: Kindle Edition Verified Purchase
Recently there has been a growth in contrarian claims that major environmental problems just aren't real. If you read the Mail, Telegraph and, sadly, even the Times in recent years you might think there was a debate about whether or not global warming/climate change was really happening.
There is no debate: the basic principles were established long ago. Science is never complete, there is always scope for debate about the details, the rate at which various things will occur, models can always be improved. And this is where confusion is spread. 'Free market fundamentalists' as this book ends up defining the main players in this story use the nature of science; that there is always some uncertainty and more needs to be researched to deliberately confuse issues; to suggest that not knowing precisely how pumping CO2 into the atmosphere will affect the climate in minute detail is the same thing as not knowing that it will cause the world to heat up overall.
This book shows how an anti-science movement began when the tobacco industry recruited scientists to help obscure the harm cigarette smoking caused. (Oddly most of the scientists in this story began as cold war rocket scientists.) There was a calculated strategy of distortion and misleading the public about the harm caused by cigarettes, and the same people went on to argue against almost every ecological threat and for nuclear weapons right up to the present day. It's the same people, the same "think" tanks, the same techniques, the same funders (though in recent years the fossil fuel corporations have played an increasingly large role.)
And it all stems from wishful thinking. 'The invisible hand of the market' will create the 'best of all possible worlds' and any regulation is a bad thing.
Read more ›
Comment 13 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Format: Hardcover
In 1988 the United States was on course to take remedial action to slow the pace of man-made global warming. But by the mid 1990s the issue was dead. This change was brought about by a small, loosely connected group of individuals, who used skills and techniques they had honed during earlier campaigns:
> on behalf of tobacco companies to deny the adverse health effects of smoking (when the tobacco companys' own scientists had known the truth for decades);
> on behalf of chemical companies to deny the existence of the ozone hole, and when that was established beyond doubt, to pretend that it was not caused by the release of CFCs;
> on behalf of the fossil fuel industry to deny that the burning of coal was the principle cause of acid rain;
> and other issues.
And again and again the same names, Singer, Seitz and Nierenberg in particular, keep cropping up.

This extraordinarily important book describes the history of each campaign in turn, and exposes the techniques of disinformation which proved, and continue to prove, so devastatingly effective, especially when people were being fed things they wanted to hear which allowed them to continue irresponsible behaviour. The power of a few determined mavericks to successfully undermine the combined expertise and authority of mainstream scientific bodies at the highest level is chillingly apparent.

The authority of the book, with its moderate, scholarly tone and its 64 pages of references, is all too evident. Indeed the reader can only wish that its appalling story were not so obviously true.
Read more ›
Comment 40 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Format: Hardcover
"As recently as 2007, 40% of Americans believed that scientific experts were still arguing about the realities of global warming." And, of course, they were not; global warming is a long-acknowledged, scientific fact, say science professor Naomi Oreskes and science writer Erik M. Conway. They show how "merchants of doubt" - a dedicated cabal of conservative scientists on the payrolls of industries and right-wing think tanks - have labored successfully over the decades to convince a broad spectrum of the public that the truth is not true, that scientific fact is merely opinion, that secondhand smoke will not kill you, that industrial pollution did not cause acid rain, that chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) did not deplete the ozone layer and that global warming does not exist. In this jaw-dropping, meticulously researched work of science, politics and investigative journalism, Oreskes and Conway track the shockingly long history of widespread, willful dissemination of scientific fiction in the service of politics and profits. getAbstract recommends this sure-to-be classic to all those interested in the environment, in the processes of politics, science and media, and in learning the hard facts that underlie so much propaganda.
Comment 33 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Format: Kindle Edition Verified Purchase
A history of the disinformation campaign against the facts regarding smoking and health, the hole in the ozone layer and climate change science. How unfair arguments, lies and deceit have been employed to support big business and governments who don't want to do anything to protect people and the planet. This book is clear and well argued -- but its opponents will not be deterred by the truth. Anyone who wants to understand the way irrational ideas become acceptable should read this book.
Comment 6 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse

Most Recent Customer Reviews



Feedback