FREE Delivery in the UK.
In stock.
Dispatched from and sold by Amazon. Gift-wrap available.
Megaprojects and Risk: An... has been added to your Basket
+ £2.80 UK delivery
Used: Very Good | Details
Condition: Used: Very Good
Comment: Ships from the UK within 24 hours. Your purchase supports authors through the Book Author Resale Right. Reprinted 2005.
Have one to sell?
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See all 3 images

Megaprojects and Risk: An Anatomy of Ambition Paperback – 13 Feb 2003

5.0 out of 5 stars 4 customer reviews

See all formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price
New from Used from
Kindle Edition
"Please retry"
"Please retry"
£16.28 £16.17
Note: This item is eligible for click and collect. Details
Pick up your parcel at a time and place that suits you.
  • Choose from over 13,000 locations across the UK
  • Prime members get unlimited deliveries at no additional cost
How to order to an Amazon Pickup Location?
  1. Find your preferred location and add it to your address book
  2. Dispatch to this address when you check out
Learn more
£21.99 FREE Delivery in the UK. In stock. Dispatched from and sold by Amazon. Gift-wrap available.
click to open popover

Special Offers and Product Promotions

Frequently Bought Together

  • Megaprojects and Risk: An Anatomy of Ambition
  • +
  • The Failure of Risk Management: Why it's Broken and How to Fix it
  • +
  • The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable
Total price: £63.47
Buy the selected items together

Enter your mobile number below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Getting the download link through email is temporarily not available. Please check back later.

  • Apple
  • Android
  • Windows Phone

To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.

Product details

  • Paperback: 218 pages
  • Publisher: Cambridge University Press; First Edition, Sixth Impression edition (13 Feb. 2003)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0521009464
  • ISBN-13: 978-0521009461
  • Product Dimensions: 15.2 x 1.6 x 22.8 cm
  • Average Customer Review: 5.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (4 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Bestsellers Rank: 121,206 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
  • See Complete Table of Contents

Product Description


'Life is too short to read every tome penned by Scandinavian and German social scientists. But Megaprojects and Risk, written by Bent Flyvbjerg, Nils Bruzelius and Werner Rothengatter, is a cracker. In lurid and startling detail it examines dozens of vast construction schemes around the world.' The Times

'… impressive … Get the book and read the story. It's megamazing.' Law Society Journal

'I will use this book for many years to come in my urban planning classes … Anyone concerned with public works projects, planning, and ethics in public policy making should read this book. It provides a genuinely original perspective.' Martin Wachs, University of California, Berkeley

'This book is a warning against the betrayal of public trust when hubris and profit come together. It shows that some decisions are too important to be left only to the accredited experts; that there is no substitute for a post-normal science involving citizens' active participation … We should all learn the lesson brought home by this book, and never accept uncritically the experts' 'magic numbers' that are used to justify megaprojects.' Silvio Funtowicz and Jerry Ravetz, authors of Uncertainty and Quality of Science for Policy

'Reading this fascinating story … one is reminded of Enron and similar affairs … recommends itself.' Andreas Faludi, University of Nijmegen

'The book is provocative throughout, documenting the often dismal performance history of these huge projects and calling attention to the forces that make reform a formidable undertaking.' Civil Engineering

'Megaprojects and Risk is an important and innovative book. It should be required reading for any serious student of planning and project management, as well as for professionals concerned with the planning and financing of public projects.' Peter Hall, Institute of Community Studies, London

'… should be required reading for anybody in government with any role of budgetary oversight.' Moneyweb

'The book is of enormous practical relevance, written by a team whose empirical engagement with their material - and what important empirical and theoretical material it is - is exemplary … This is a social science that matters - because it makes a difference.' Stewart Clegg, University of Technology, Sydney

'… fascinating … Do read this book.' Financial Express

'… a thought-provoking book that presents a clear, concise, and readable argument to change the ways large infrastructure projects are managed around the world.' Environment & Planning

'For readers interested in project management, Megaprojects and Risk is a must.' Barbara Czarniawska, School of Economics and Commercial Law, Gothenburg University 'In particular, the aspect of unstoppable projects seems to be of pivotal interest and has been overlooked in literature on planning until recently. Flyvbjerg et al. fill this gap … a fascinating reading that convincingly illustrates shortcomings, pitfalls and strategies of megaproject developments … I can only recommend people to read this book even if planning, reform or risk analysis are currently only of remote interest to the reader - this book might change this.' British Journal of Sociology

'Many people talk about deliberative democracy, but few have actually done it. Megaprojects and Risk is an important contribution to the literature showing how it is possible for us to deliberate rationally and publicly about risk and those large scale decisions that are increasingly the concern of modern politics.' James Bohman, St Louis University

'Love them or loathe them, megaprojects capture the imagination … And Bent Flyvbjerg's damning analysis concentrates on a series of financial nightmares that should bring even the most casual reader out in a sweat.' New Scientist

'Megaprojects and Risk provides a fascinating look at the pervasiveness of misinformation in the planning of major construction projects and the systematic bias of such misinformation toward justifying project implementation. The power of its analysis is vastly reinforced by the range of cases examined, extending over seventy years and five continents. An extraordinary accomplishment, it will doubtless serve as the standard reference on this topic for many years to come.' Alan Altshuler, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University

Book Description

A fascinating account of how promoters of multi-billion dollar megaprojects systematically and self-servingly misinform parliaments, the public and the media in order to get projects approved and built. The authors not only explore problems but also suggest practical solutions drawing on theory and evidence from the hundreds of projects studied.

See all Product Description

Customer Reviews

5.0 out of 5 stars
5 star
4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star
See all 4 customer reviews
Share your thoughts with other customers

Top Customer Reviews

Format: Paperback
Finally, I have found a book that examines the risk profile as a result of misinformation.
Though written with mega projects in mind, I’m sure that most of us working in projects can recognize the same problems occurring on minor projects.
This book should be mandatory reading for politicians, project managers and other stakeholders on any given project.
Comment 5 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
I put this book in the same category at Terry Smith's "Accounting for Growth" which changed the way the world looked at company reporting. Though most of the creative accounting that Terry Smith referred to has been cleaned up the same cannot be said of the tricks and swerves found in Megaprojects and Major Programs. Anyone who is a practitioner on a megaproject probably already knew what was going on but Flyvbjerg and Bruzelius have gone to the trouble of quantifying it and providing us with evidence. The book also takes a long overdue sideswipe at poor quality risk proceesses and makes a good case for much more effective and open project appraisal. So in summary like Accounting for Growth this book dares to cast a light on some very costly and unsavoury practices that society leaders indulge in at our cost and with no comebacks. In a properly functioning democracy it would be acted on by the media and taxpayers to put the brakes on politicians and other grand visionaries who are fond of using other people' money to build monuments to their vanity. Finally, this book introduced me to the theory of "optimism bias" which, I have witnessed at close proximity in IT projects for 25 years without realising what it was. For that alone I am grateful. So, there it is. One of two books that I have read that successfully summed up a subject that truly stinks. Terry Smith cleaned up a mess and built a career on Accounting for Growth. I hope the authors do the same with Megaprojects and Risk.
Comment 3 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Format: Paperback
Highly recommended for academics and practitioners alike.
Mega-projects are here to stay. Deal with them!
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
Very useful book, for planners and academics alike.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse

Most Helpful Customer Reviews on (beta) HASH(0x9daf2eac) out of 5 stars 19 reviews
25 of 27 people found the following review helpful
HASH(0x9c8a43a8) out of 5 stars A fool, his money and the bridge that parted them....... 13 Sept. 2003
By Gary C. Marfin - Published on
Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
I am the first reviewer of this short, but important book. It concerns me that this might reflect a diminished U.S. readership. That would be unfortunate. Professor Bent Flyvbjerg and his colleagues have written a book of significance to taxpayers everywhere. It's apparent that they have written this book largely for the policy-maker; yet, make no mistake about it: the ordinary taxpayer has a major stake in this book's message. The central characters in Megaprojects and Risk are three large-scale, European transportation projects: the Chunnel, the Great Belt and the Oresund. American readers unfamilar with these names (the chunnel connecting London and Paris is perhaps the most recognizable to American readers) will nonetheless recognize familiar features. Specifically, they will find project costs that exceed estimates, and revenue inflows that are below projections. The traits are not unique to these projects. In fact, cost over-runs and revenue disappointments are a familiar global refrain, according to these authors. In spite of this, the number and scale of infrastructure projects continues to grow, forming what they call the megaproject paradox. The book is stronger on documenting problems, including the lack of project post-audits, than on providing solutions. I think they have correctly identified the problem -- the lack of accountability throughout the project life-cycle -- but their solution, which largely involves ensuring a healthy segment of private capital not supported by state guarantees, together with more attention to genuine risk assessment, falls short of the mark. The risk assessment tools are firmly established and largely well-understood (Monte Carlo simulation packages are increasingly available). So is the "moral hazard" problem that rears its ugly head when projects (in this case) are "over-insured." The difficulty, which they acknowledge, is that the political interplay between state, private interests and NGOs are decisive in determining whether and to what extent the appropriate risk assessment and risk management tools are used.
This problem is inherent in the beast. Policy-makers would love for the private sector to shoulder the risk, but may not be willing to permit a commensurate return. Private players, just as understandably, are apt to seek insurance of one kind or another on the downside. The best medicine, and one that this book delivers admirably, is simply to raise our awareness of the track record from the start.
This short book has the look and feel of an academic work. It would, however, be unfortunate if it languished at the university bookstore. Global demographics dictate that larger-scale infrastructure investments are in our future. No one should pay for, promote or plan for such projects before they have digested the lessons in Megaprojects and Risk.
12 of 14 people found the following review helpful
HASH(0x9c8a41d4) out of 5 stars Packed with Knowledge! 1 Mar. 2004
By Rolf Dobelli - Published on
Format: Paperback
Every once in a while a little book comes along that, while small in size, carries sufficient intellectual weight to strike the body politic between the eyes, thereby getting its collective attention. This may be one such book. It offers a realistic look at megaprojects - those major infrastructure endeavors that span vast bodies of water, dam natural resources to generate energy and extend rail lines to previously unreachable regions - and compares the promises of these projects to what they actually deliver. The report card isn't very good. Cost overruns are typically 25% to 100%, and sometimes 200% or more. Worse yet, studies show that the public tends to use megaprojects - be they airports or subway systems - only a fraction of the amount predicted. We strongly recommends this book to politicians, legislators and anyone who wants to know the truth behind these huge infrastructure projects, as well as to CEOs, CFOs, project managers and risk officers in the private sector - this applies to your projects, even if there is a difference of scale.
6 of 7 people found the following review helpful
HASH(0x9c89aed0) out of 5 stars Use BEFORE every big infrastructure project! 25 Jan. 2013
By David Zetland - Published on
Format: Paperback
I first saw this book in the hands of a student in my policy analysis class several years ago, and I regret that I waited so long to read it.

Now I have, and I think that many of you will want to read it as well.

The book, authored by Flyvbjerg, Bruzelius and Rothengatter (FBR), is subtitled "an anatomy of ambition" but its subtitle should be "an examination of why big transportation projects go wrong, how to make them right, and why these ideas apply to all large infrastructure projects," but the marketing department probably favored snappy over accurate.

The main point that FBR make, in clear and painful detail, is that megaprojects (projects that have big financial, economic, social and/or environmental impacts) usually fail because their proponents and constructors do not bear the risk of failure when estimating the cost of constructing the project or demand for its services once completed. The risk is instead carried by taxpayers who end up paying more than expected to fund a project that's less useful than promised.

If that sounds familiar (it reminds me of Cadillac Desert, desalination in San Diego, the Colorado Aqueduct, Aridzona's CAP, the Delta "Conveyance", Coyote's critiques of light rail, and chapter 8 of my book), then you will STILL gain something by reading this book due to its clear analysis, useful case studies and forthright declaration of how to prevent failures in the future.

Here are the notes I made while reading:

FBR make the important point that "dialogue" cannot overcome power. It's therefore necessary to change rules to improve accountability (they recommend that private money fund at least one-third of a project's cost, with no government guarantee of repayment in the event of poor performance).
Many projects are "born in sin" - with unrealistic forecasts of costs and revenues. They should not be built, but developers often get paid their full fee when they are. That's no way to bring discipline to this arena.
A huge share of environmental impact reports are carried out when the project is already going forward, do not contain adequate baseline data (to make it possible to understand actual impacts) and are very rarely updated after project completion (this is a common problem; development aid projects are not often subject to performance reviews).
It's not unusual to ignore new costs that will result from reducing environmental impacts -- costs that may push the benefit:cost ratio below 1.0!
Many simulations of futures follow a EGAP protocol (Everything Goes According to Plan) when it would be much more useful and enlightening to consider Worst Case or MLD (Most Likely Development) scenarios.
Such myopia is expected when the developer does the simulation for a government that is the proponent of a project that it's ALSO supposed to regulate and oversee.
To improve accountability, FBR propose accountability,* performance (not technology) specifications, clearly defined regulations and risk-bearing, and involving (private) risk capital.
If private capital is not willing to invest without guarantees,THEN MAYBE THE PROJECT SUCKS.
The book's full of checklists and flowcharts. It could be used as a cookbook for analyzing megaprojects. I wonder if anyone at the Bureau of Reclamation has a copy?
FBR think that private or state companies can build megaprojects, but they need to do so as risk-carrying, stand-alone companies that are supervised by the government.
Never underestimate the potential manipulation of rent-seeking politicians and/or special interests (developers, construction companies, transport companies, et al.)

Bottom Line: I give this book FIVE STARS. It should be used to vet, design and audit every project using public money or affecting public resources. We'd have far fewer white elephants if it was!
* Dan Ariely (review coming!) has found that transparency can result in MORE inaccuracy, as when the scrutinized estimator increases the fudge factor (e.g., +20 percent to cost) in the knowledge that it will be bargained down, but then makes more when it's not bargained down enough (e.g., -10 percent to cost). FBR's transparency is less vulnerable to this problem as they propose posting all documents in public AND allowing peer review, but this transparency will only really work if there's some SERIOUS exploration of numbers and estimates.
8 of 10 people found the following review helpful
HASH(0x9c89aeac) out of 5 stars Important, a quick read, a valuable reference. 8 Dec. 2007
By R. A. Dunning - Published on
Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
Megaprojects and Risk: An Anatomy of Ambition

It is not an accident that your local megaproject is running at least 50% over budget or, more likely, 100% (plus) over budget. It is so much of a problem in megaprojects that the only reasonable conclusion is to assume all announced megaproject budgets are low by multiple factors. The numbers are produced by experienced consulting professionals under the direction of government planning agencies. Both groups should know better. We are therefore forced to conclude that the numbers are not off by accident.

This book is an easy read with a recurring theme. By the time the book is finished the point is pounded home. Until the trend is corrected, which is until people and organizations are rewarded or penalized based on the accuracy of their numbers, all megaprojects everywhere are highly suspect - if not already convicted of deliberate deceit of the public.
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
HASH(0x9c89acd8) out of 5 stars Dense and overly technical to be a practicle guide. 11 April 2013
By Timothy E. Connolly - Published on
Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
I have many years of experience working on multi-billion dollar infrastrucutre projects and my view is that this subject would be better suited as a short article. That said, it is a useful reference tools with an unbiased opinion on how to reduce risk on mega projects.
Were these reviews helpful? Let us know