Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet or computer – no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
As Meat Loves Salt Paperback – 4 Mar. 2002
A sensational tale of obsession and murder from a wonderful writer. ‘An outstanding novel, fresh and unusual [with] all the dirt, stink, rasp and flavour of the time.’ Daily Telegraph
‘Early in the English Civil War, a body is dredged from the pond of a Royalist estate. “As Meat Loves Salt” is the testament of Jacob Cullen – homicide and fugitive. Obsessed with the graceful Christopher Ferris, he follows him to become a London printer, a Digger and, finally, an emigrant to the New World…An electrifying erotic thriller, rich in secrets and surprises.’ Independent
- Print length544 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherFlamingo
- Publication date4 Mar. 2002
- Dimensions12.8 x 3 x 19.81 cm
- ISBN-10000655248X
- ISBN-13978-0006552482
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Product description
Review
‘A fat, juicy masterpiece. Jacob, who destroys what he loves with the rapacity of his desire, is as compelling as he is appalling…Most impressively, the writing here is flawless. These pages flow like claret.’ Economist
‘A novel teeming with life…a triumphant piece of historical evocation. McCann’s unflinching descriptions of battle are matched by the power of her depiction of London in all its fetid splendour. And in the character of Jacob himself, a strong but selfish man weakened by a violent temper and haunted by guilty dreams, McCann shows the imaginative empathy that is the hallmark of a true novelist.’ Vogue
‘A true delight, vivid, well written and, best of all, accessible…Maria McCann’s characters leap off the page and speak in contemporary voices that entirely convince.’ Daily Express
‘An intriguing and disturbing first novel which lingers in the mind…Tense with anguish, intimacy and shame, it imaginatively re-creates the mentality of a society racked by war and intoxicated by radical new ideas of freedom and change.’ TLS
From the Back Cover
“Early in the English Civil War, a body is dredged from the pond of a Royalist estate. 'As Meat Loves Salt ' is the testament of Jacob Cullen – homicide and fugitive. Obsessed with the graceful Christopher Ferris, he follows him to become a London printer, a Digger and, finally, an emigrant to the New World… An electrifying erotic thriller, rich in secrets and surprises.”
INDEPENDENT
”A fat, juicy masterpiece. Jacob, who destroys what he loves with the rapacity of his desire, is a compelling as he is appalling… Most impressively, the writing here is flawless. These pages flow like claret.”
”An intriguing and disturbing first novel which lingers in the mind.”
TSL
About the Author
Maria McCann was born in Liverpool in 1956 and spent most of her childhood there devouring novels at every opportunity. She read English at the University of Durham and then embarked on a series of jobs including Citizens’ Advice, telephonist, artist’s model and EFL teacher. Since 1988 she has been a Lecturer in English at a Somerset college. An Arvon course gave her the confidence to write after years of ‘scribbling’ and she later read for an MA in Writing at the University of Glamorgan. She loves plays, gin, dancing and dogs. This is her first novel.
Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved.
Pull, he called.
Zeb and I seized an end of rope each and leant backwards. Our weight moved the body along by perhaps two feet.
Come, Jacob, you can do better than that, called Sir John, as if we were practising some sport. I wondered how much wine he had got down his throat already.
Her clothes must be sodden, said Godfrey. He came over and joined Zeb on the line, taking care to stand well away from my brother s dripping garments. Or she s caught on something
There was a swirl in the water and a sucking noise. Izzy leapt back.
The body sat up, breaking the surface. I saw a scalp smeared with stiffened hair. Then it plunged forwards as if drunk, sprawling full length in the shallower waters at the base of the runway. I descended again and took it under the arms, wrestling it up the slope until it lay face to the sky. The mouth was full of mud.
You see? whispered Zeb, wiping his brow.
The corpse was not that of Patience Hannah White. Our catch was a different fish entirely: Christopher Walshe, late of this parish, who up to now had not even been missed.
Product details
- Publisher : Flamingo
- Publication date : 4 Mar. 2002
- Language : English
- Print length : 544 pages
- ISBN-10 : 000655248X
- ISBN-13 : 978-0006552482
- Item weight : 374 g
- Dimensions : 12.8 x 3 x 19.81 cm
- Best Sellers Rank: 768,277 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- 29,302 in Historical Fiction (Books)
- 33,532 in Contemporary Fiction (Books)
- Customer reviews:
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read book recommendations and more.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings, help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyses reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonTop reviews from United Kingdom
There was a problem filtering reviews. Please reload the page.
- Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 7 December 2013I came away from reading this book feeling there was little doubt that it was a masterpiece- in that well-worn phrase I couldn't put it down. The story is set during the English civil War in a society where royalists and parliamentarians are engaged in an internecine struggle for supremacy. A battle mirrored in the love story between two men from very different backgrounds who start an uneasy friendship that escalates into a full blown love affair: they both want to control the other, ultimately tearing each other apart- their love affair destroyed because neither is able to compromise or mitigate who they really are for someone else. I found it fascinating and horrifying in equal measure. The writing is flawless- rich in detail and colour. The descriptions of the siege of Basing, Cheapside and the levellers style commune for instance are all masterly. The plot, characters and dialogue are likewise handled adeptly. McCann has done a fine job of not giving her historical characters C21st values and ways of thought: the use of violence, and the fluidity of sexual desire are prime examples both of which are central to this book. It is quite unlike anything else I've read.
The relationship between Jacob (the protagonist) and Ferris, is at the core of the book, and is by turns violent, erotic and moving: it lingers long in the memory. Jacob at first is quite repellent, even psychopathic but the author slowly reveals more and more of him and as the book progressed I found myself warming to him - a character in equal measure compelling and appalling. There were many instances where I felt sympathy for his behaviour and actions, all his thoughts and inner conflicts- are expertly described, so even when the reader has cause to question Jacobs moral judgements we can still sometimes understand his actions. The tragedy is that whilst Jacob achieves self-knowledge, he seems unable to change his character in any meaningful sense - destroying what he loves at the end, just as he does at the beginning.
****Spoiler alert for the rest of the review****
At the start of the book Jacob seems cruel, bestial and malicious, but his relationship with the virtuous Ferris, a soldier fighting in the new model army, seems transformative, making him question his behaviour, sexuality, and his obsessive need for love and mastery: Ferris acts almost as Jacobs conscience; a sort of civilising influence as he struggles to define his personal morality. The relationship intrigues, because at first Ferris appears as good as Jacob first appeared bad, and for a while the relationship seems to work as they embark on an all-consuming love affair that satisfies them like no other, the couple seem harmonious- mutually enriched- almost like two sides of the same coin, but the balance subtly starts to slide the other way; other reviewers have mainly focused on Jacobs character, and have only touched on this, but I feel at the crux of the meaning of this book is that Ferris is in essence exactly like Jacob, (granted his motives and behaviour are more honest) but he also is unable to change his character to his detriment.
As Jacob is the protagonist we are familiar with his point of view and Ferris' responses to him, but flipped the other way, Ferris also loses the person to whom he belongs because he is unable to change his nature. Locked in to his belief in the purity of his own emotions and idealistic beliefs Ferris won't acknowledge the effect his ambition for the Levellers like `New Jerusalem' colony has on those he loves- namely his Aunt and of course Jacob. Ferris manipulatively bends Jacob further and further into obedience - insisting on his cherished dream of the colony which he knows will be detrimental to both Jacob and his Aunt. Despite professing to love Jacob, Ferris remains utterly unconcerned that Jacob repeatedly mentions that he would not be happy in a life that would return him to the brutal servitude of his youth. And neither can Ferris wait to escape his beloved aunt; even when she is ill and dying he seems oblivious to her feelings, her needs and situation. I found myself liking Ferris less and less as the relationship progressed, seriously calling into question his motives. Ferris refuses to make any compromise of his idealistic ambition to either of them, which seems incredibly selfish especially when later on, his pride stops him disbanding the colony when he knows they are facing almost certain death: His beliefs are to be pursued at any cost. Ferris may be more principled than Jacob, but the way he cuts his previous love Nat out of his life, to take up with Jacob, and then later moves just as swiftly from Jacob to Caro make him seem rather fickle.
With all this in mind, the reader is prepared for the story not to end well, never the less, the climax was incredibly upsetting -Jacob and Ferris' mutual betrayal of each other had me reeling- perhaps because the reader, having invested so much emotion in these characters wants the relationship to work out on some level. It's brave of the author to not take that option, and to leave us with the much bleaker resolution of Jacob and Ferris destroying each other, by being unable to compromise or mitigate who they really are.
The main flaw of the book, for me was that knowing Jacobs character as we do, his act of murder at the start is not credible, his motives are too thin, and I felt that more needed to be included as to why he did it- the murder is constantly alluded to throughout as he tries at various points to explain it to Ferris, but whilst several options were possible, none is really given- even at the end Jacobs description of it, it given more to frighten Ferris than offer any real explanation. For me this undermines the plot and Jacobs character, as although a lot of Jacobs subsequent behaviour is violently unacceptable, he does not kill on a whim or in cold blood- all his 'bad' behaviour stems from his inability to govern his passions. Another reviewer raised an interesting point regarding possible motive or at least character development which I also think is important, which is a conversation between Jacob and his brother Zeb when they meet up again in London after the murder. Zeb is describing the day that Jacob beat him (and maybe more) in the orchard, (an event Jacob does not remember) he says that when Jacob attacked him he was `standing in for father.' The inference being that their father had beaten Jacob, but also, assuming Zeb's suggestion of some sort of sexual abuse is true, then their father probably sexually abused Jacob, too. Furthermore, Zeb seems already aware that Jacob has homosexual tendencies, which since he hasn't known Jacob during his love affair with Ferris, means that Zeb believed this to be the case even in their youth. This would psychologically explain elements of Jacobs character but is never referenced in terms of the murder- I would like to know if Jacob was perhaps sexually attracted to his brother Zeb or Walshe? He seems jealous when Walshe puts his arm around Zeb when they are reading the pamphlets. Zeb also used to share a bed with Jacob, before he later shares one with Izzy- Jacob can't recall exactly when but notes that afterwards Zeb "was never the same with me again. He withdrew from me", and the day of the wedding as the brothers are washing and dressing, Jacob remarks favourably on seeing Zeb naked.
Also with reference to the plot, I feel the re-introduction of Caro towards the end is altogether to neat to be convincing- admittedly it does tighten up the drama of the denouement, but for it to properly work, her character probably needed to be re-introduced sooner.
All in all though, this is an amazing unforgettable book that I couldn't put down, and stayed with me long after finishing it. It is satisfying on almost every level- beautifully written, a gripping story with memorable characters that was quite unlike anything I've read before.
A last somewhat minor point- the UK paperback cover is not indicative, and is misleading- the image chosen simply doesn't make sense- this is a destructive love story between two men, so why do we have a woman in a dress on the cover? Perhaps it's meant to be Caro, if so the designer probably just read the first chapter! More suitable is the US paperback with the painting `The Wounded Man' a self-portrait by Gustav Courbet, which nicely recalls the pivotal moment in the book where Ferris first lays eyes on Jacob.
- Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 16 June 2014This is quite a long book, but I was gripped from start to finish. The setting of the English Civil War plays an important part.
I saw this book described as an erotic thriller, which is not at all what it is. It is not a thriller (although it is gripping). It has a few erotic moments, but they are only a minor part. Jacob, the central character is a lost soul. He has been downardly mobile following his father's death. At the opening he is a rural house servant (an improvement on his earlier agricultural labouring) with republican sympathies. He escapes to join the army where he meets Ferris, a successful London merchant. Ferris challenges many of Jacob's ideas, but does not take him much closer to who he is. Jacob's life course is determined by his inability to control his anger. Three separate events happen as a result of his rage. In each case he has to disrupt his existence as a result.
I thought it was a very daring idea, which is very professionally delivered. I think she is a writer to watch.
- Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 21 October 2019God what a book. It took me a while to get into. At first the prose is unusual, being in the 17th century style, but it works well. Sometimes expressions are hard to fathom but it doesn't matter, it feels right.
The story of Jacob Cullen, an anti hero on the run from justice perhaps, at least from the scene of a crime where we learn that he is the murderer.
But the point of the book is not about justice or penance or reward, or even retribution, it's a journey and we spend it in the head of our narrator Cullen. It's so hard to pull off being inside the head of a charachter that is so dangerously unstable and yet so perversely appealing.
Patricia Highsmith did it so perfectly with Ripley, although not in the first person. Anthony Burgess does it with Alex, the psycho, amoral, juvenile delinquent in A Clockwork Orange. And McCann does it here.
The book is a bloody, filthy, intense plunge into the world of Oliver Cromwell's England and his New Model Army. It's not a romp, it's like being dragged by your twisted arm through a thorny bush.
As he escapes and is left for dead, Cullen is saved by the more conventional hero Christopher Ferris. They go AWOL together and end up in London, but Ferris's ultinate aim is a to establish a free-hinking colony of equals in the countryside.
The story is intense, the charachters veer from detestable to despicable and yet are heartbreakingly and unbearably believable. What I loved so much about this author and the many others that have the courage to make the protagonists immoral or amoral, is the honesty to pick open people's less than laudable, vile, cruel and hateful traits but allow one to emphasize with them. Who amongst us hasn't occasionall felt a blind, red hot rage, been debilitated by jealousy, been weak, cruel, penitent.
I loved the charachter of Cullen because of his tempestuous, ungovernable temper as much as for the besotted passion he has for Ferris. He is dreadful, but he is human.
Ferris is the other side of the coin. It is as if they are bound together, as opposites, dark and light. But I didn't see Ferris as the symbol of goodness and idealism alone. He was that, but he was also capable of detachment, coldness and diffidence. And perhaps it was this that made me root for Cullen more. I wanted it to work, but they were both as guilty as each other. Of being faithless, fallible and weak.
Writing this review mainly to get my thoughts down before they melt away. But I loved this book. I haven't been this obsessed by a story and its characters for years. And its such an impossible combination of devastating and heart gripping.
SPOILER
Not since Winston's betrayal of Julia in 1984 have I read anything that has made me rage so much. I couldn't bear it. Ah, Ferris. I could have killed him myself. I couldn't bear his faithlessness and yet the skill of the writer to have you dying to keep these two together at all costs, while having just witnessed Jacob's brutality, and STILL burning for him and weeping for his downfall. God she is good.
I read Jacob's collapse into madness and jealousy through clenched teeth. I hated reading it but I loved Maria McCann's writing so much. What prose. And the descriptions of the men's encounters were really quite mind blowingly erotic. I don't know why. McCann has somehow managed to convey, without graphic, liberally spread excess, just extraordinary passion and eroticism.
So many thoughts about this story which is surely the mark of great writing. What is the Voice? Jacob's madness, his religiousness, his jealousy, his own excoriating self-loathing? And Ferris, what a flawed man. Such a brilliant combination of idealism and pig headedness. I loved him, but many times I didn't like him. And yet his love for Cullen, their love for eachother, was so artfully drawn, full of the contradictions and the obsessions of erotic passion and then, the ultimate faithlessness and failure of love. All devastating and so perfect.
This review does no justice to the book. It is extraordinary, immersive, painful, erotic, evocative. If you read one book this year read this.
- Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 20 February 2012I agree entirely with A.Customer's review. I found the book well researched, convincing and all the other positive observations made in the other reviews BUT I just feel too uncomfortable with the book as a whole.Perhaps I am shallow but I like to get something positive out of a book. At the moment I'm half way through and it's a struggle to continue although I feel I must just in case there is a glimmer of light at the end of the tunnel.
In my opinion, it is an excellent book and extremely well written but I personally need a bit more light to contrast the shade. It is powerful , in that it has the ability to depress and actually gave me bad dreams.Well worth the debate
Top reviews from other countries
S. CaughieReviewed in the United States on 27 February 20135.0 out of 5 stars Haunted
I finished this novel a good month ago, and knew I wanted to review it, but I was so blasted by it that I couldn't get my head together to do it. I thought that in a few days I'd get a grip, but it didn't, and to be honest I still haven't, so I think I'll just go for it. And BTW there are a few spoilers in here, so read at your own risk!
First of all, I should say that those five stars up there might be misleading. Amazon translates them as 'I Love It' and I'm not sure that I do. I have enormous respect for the author for taking on such an ambitious project, and doing so well by it. I think the writing and world building are fantastic, the characterizations fascinating, the whole premise enormously compelling. But it's all also deeply disturbing, and I feel more haunted by it than enamored.
Why? Well, that's where I lose the plot a bit...
Actually, the plot is ostensibly simple: two soldiers meet in Cromwell's army, run away to London, fall in love and into an impossible affair that ultimately destroys them. So far, so gay Mills & Boon. Except that it's not. For one thing, every stage of the plot is given a luxurious amount of time to develop. I'm aware that a lot of readers disliked this and felt it made the novel drag as a whole, but I liked the fact that it wasn't just a war story, or a romance, or a domestic drama, but all of them, and none of them. They were all given equal air-time, all aspects fleshed out.
The only part of the plot I didn't like was the last bit in the Diggers' colony, probably because it was so obviously going to fail, and because it was the wedge that drove Jacob and Christopher apart. But then again, there's something to be said for the very deliberate, awful inevitability of it. The (maybe) re-introduction of Caro at the end also left a bad taste in my mouth. On one hand, I'd been expecting it since the horrific scene where we leave her at the beginning. But the way the author used it seemed a bit facile and rushed - the only part of the plot for me that did.
As a historical novel, it doesn't really get better than this. Throughout, the historical detail is meticulously drawn, from the barbaric slaughterhouse of a Reformation battlefield, to the gorgeous love-letter, to what's on the breakfast table. This, too, seems to have earned McCann criticism, but personally, I thought it made for a very rich world that I was sad to leave. It's an unusual time period in fiction too - the only novel I've read that comes close to McCann's photo-realistic portrayal of 17th century England is Geraldine Brooks' 'Year of Wonders' (which is another must read, btw, as long as you ignore the absurd epilogue.)
The love story at the heart of the novel is compelling too. Though McCann uses a number of romance-novel tropes (looong reveals, painful delays, soul-eating guilt, Heathcliffish hair-tearing) and though it's clear from the moment Jacob and Christopher meet that it isn't going to end well, their story is still completely gripping. And even though it's obviously going to be a train wreck, I wouldn't even call the ending predictable. I guessed fairly early on what was going to happen to the two main characters, but I was way off about *how* it would happen. Which I love in a novel!
I think the thing that hangs most people up about this book, and likely the reason it got under my skin to the extent that it did, is Jacob's mental state. I hesitate to say madness, in the same way I hesitate to brand him a horrible person, even though it seems most readers are firmly in one camp or the other. There's no doubt that Jacob does a lot of awful things, and never seems to learn from his remorse in the aftermath, but somehow I couldn't just dismiss him as bad. Likewise, though he talks about hearing voices and he's clearly paranoid, I think it's too simple to ascribe everything he does to schizophrenia or some other mental illness.
My personal theory about why he was so angry and destructive is one I haven't seen come up in other discussions, and is based on one tiny, crucial and apparently overlooked reference in his conversation with Zeb in London. Zeb is describing the day that Jacob beat him (and maybe more) in the orchard, he says that when Jacob attacked him he said something along the lines of, 'Now father's gone, I have to take his place.' Which I construed to mean not just that their father had beaten Jacob, but also, assuming Zeb's suggestion of sexual abuse is true, then their father probably sexually abused Jacob, too. Which would explain a whole lot about his anger, memory holes, lack of empathy, sensitivity to what he perceives as betrayal, etc.
But in the mind games, there's also Christopher to consider. A lot of reviewers describe him as a good man, but I don't think that does his character any more justice than calling Jacob a bad one. Christopher is a golden boy, grew up wealthy and indulged by his aunt, apparently did more or less what he liked. It's clear by the way that he's treated in the army that he's charismatic, and used to getting what he wants from people. I was beginning to suspect that his halo might not be quite so shiny, and that he might actually be a bit manipulative, when he threw over Nat. This is a young boy who's been devoted to him and whom he's presumably encouraged as a lover, but he abandons him in the night to run away with Jacob, apparently on a whim. At which point I decided Christopher was definitely manipulative, also self-serving and fickle, and possibly a lot more interesting than he initially seemed. It's important to remember, too, that Christopher is only shown to us through Jacob's eyes - and how reliable is that view? That's a large part of what makes this book maddeningly compelling, I think - that like so much else in what happens to Jacob, we'll never know the true story.
I think, though, that what got to me most about this book was that despite everything, the author still made me desperately want Jacob and Christopher to be together. Even though I knew it was never going to happen, I kept hoping they'd find a way to live happily ever after until the moment they destroyed each other. And a month later, I still find myself obsessing about it. So I guess that's why this book gets five stars, even though I still feel vaguely traumatized by it: this is that rare story that grabs you, and won't let go.
Philip BarbieriReviewed in Japan on 24 April 20165.0 out of 5 stars Read with Rebels and Traitors
Maria McCann's ability to evoke seventeenth century English life is awe-inspiring. For a work of historical fiction, it was heavy on the fiction, light on history, but strong on authentic atmosphere. I read this because I wanted to know more about the English Civil War. Rebels and Traitors by Lindsey Davis is said to be heavy on history and consequently less satisfying as a novel. I'm thinking it might redress the balance.
Fernanda BellatoReviewed in Mexico on 13 December 20215.0 out of 5 stars Hauntingly beautiful
This is easily one of the best books I've read in a really long time. It handles each and every topic in a very delicate yet cruel way, and while I am not exactly religious, I even felt Jacob's desperate cling onto God in a certain level. Great read, I would totally recommend it.
Martin RyanReviewed in Australia on 22 July 20245.0 out of 5 stars as meat loves salt
A very good read
I love reading about this time in history
The characters so vivid
An amazing love story
FrancescoReviewed in the United States on 24 December 20104.0 out of 5 stars As meat meets man
OK, so the professional critics seem to have focused on two things -- the authentic details of 17th-century life, and the irregular prose.
I happen to have found the former a little too self-conscious (Pass the syllabub, please!), and the latter not much of a problem. It's a good read, and made all the more appealing by the fact that it tells the tale of a forbidden, but entirely believable love.
I think the erotic passages are rather sexy, and I am only a little put off by the realization that amidst all the hot, salty activities described, there is very little bathing. There's period detail for you!
