Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet or computer – no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Meat: A Benign Extravagance Paperback – 28 Feb. 2013
- Print length336 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherPermanent Publications
- Publication date28 Feb. 2013
- Dimensions15.7 x 1.7 x 23.3 cm
- ISBN-101856230554
- ISBN-13978-1856230551
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Product description
Review
No-one has ever analysed the world's food and agriculture more astutely than Simon Fairlie - an original thinker and a true scholar. Here he shows that while meat is generally a luxury it is often the best option, and could always be turned to advantage if only we did things properly; but this, with present economic policies and legal restrictions, is becoming less and less possible. Everyone should read this book especially governments, and all campaigners. --Colin Tudge, Biologist and author
This book is a masterpiece: original, challenging and brilliantly argued. Simon Fairlie is a great thinker and a great writer. --George Monbiot, Environmental and political activist, author and journalist
About the Author
Product details
- Publisher : Permanent Publications (28 Feb. 2013)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 336 pages
- ISBN-10 : 1856230554
- ISBN-13 : 978-1856230551
- Dimensions : 15.7 x 1.7 x 23.3 cm
- Best Sellers Rank: 449,009 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- 310 in Environmental Philosophy
- 337 in Animal Rights
- 389 in Natural Resources Management
- Customer reviews:
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings, help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyses reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from United Kingdom
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Simon Fairlie has taken the time, patience and intellectual effort to research his subject in depth: that much of this was done through his local library is even more impressive. His analysis of the role of animals in food production strategies is quantitative, and closely argued. But he also brings in an engagingly human perspective on our relationship with animals, both domesticated and wild, based on his long, varied and direct experience, and insists that nurturing this relationship is essential for the future. He shows clearly how public debate and policy formation are so easily influenced by "facts" which are just plain wrong, and sometimes mischievously so.
For this reveiwer the book is also notable for three reasons.
First, it is the most balanced treatise I have read on land use, which is the invisible elephant in the room as far as most discussions of sustainability are concerned. It's a shame it's limited to agriculture, because the sourcing of energy and materials will also impact land use in the next few decades. Apart from nuclear power, all the alternative energy technologies are land hungry.
Second, its skilful dissection of the vegan position, revealing its fear of engaging with the realities of nature,is timely. Even Stewart Brand, creator of the Whole Earth Catalog, has come out in favour of packing humans into cities (for the creativity, it seems)and surrounding them with regions reserved for agriculture and regions of "wilderness". I find this anti-human "industrial vegan" vision of the future almost too appalling to comtemplate.
Third, the permaculture approaches he writes about so lovingly derive from ideas I encountered in the late 60s and early 70s and which still resonate. "Self Sufficiency", "Small is Beautiful", "Diet for a Small Planet": all must have been seeds for his approach to life. How can one not admire a writer on sustainability who describes the poor outcome of his experiments in composting his own faeces? (Ok, I admit I tried as well, in 1974) These ideas need to be nourished if humans are to win the battle against the corporations.
To close: the book is impressive both for its sources and its sustained arguments, but also for the spicy titbits of information and stories that pepper it. Truly wonderful.
In masterful fashion the author demolishes the, often accepted, figures on water consumption and methane production of food animals. In a scholarly, but readable, work he provides a counter argument with sources cited for those who wish to study this subject more deeply. He argues that meat production is essential to provide a balanced farming economy and that the real problem is over consumption of meat and the farming methods employed to deliver this abundance.
A thought provoking work written by a man who has deep knowledge of the countryside and farming. This book provides us with a sustainable, alternative future where meat is an important part of out diet but is eaten in smaller quantities and is treated as an indulgence, as our not so distant forebears considered it.
Top reviews from other countries
Anyway, I had multiple vitamin deficiencies being vegan for 2 years, despite an almost soy-free, veggie and beans based diet (multivitamin included). I started drinking raw milk, eating raw cheese, and then I got to thinking about veal and what happens when the cow is too old, etc. Since our local organic small-town family diary farmer eats her cows (the males as a result of producing the raw milk I drink, and probably others), I started to consider eating them as well. It didn't make sense to drink the milk and refuse her meat. So yes, vegan turned local omnivore, and trying to adhere to the default livestock diet that Fairlie lays out in this book.
This book has hundreds of references, you can just go right to those papers and look for yourself. Fairlie has just put all the info in convenient form. I really enjoyed the chapter on what a vegan society's landscape might look like. This is something that the big vegan organizations never really go in to, and they should, because the picture isn't pretty. If you need a book to help you explore what kind of diet really does less harm to the planet, this is a great read. I was shocked at the chapter with the graph showing how vegetable oil production takes up as much land as beef (the least efficient meat to produce), and even more to learn how the pork industry and soy bean industry (veg oil) are so intertwined.
While I did not agree with every single one of Fairlie's arguments or conclusions, I was extremely happy with his diligent reporting of where he got his facts and how he used them. Not every reader will enjoy such a detailed level of reporting and numerical analysis, but I did. It is definitely what sets this book head and shoulders about any other in its field. Giving the proper information ensures that the reader can draw her own conclusions, rather than blindly following the author's prose to only one possible ending.
This is a groundbreaking book, and I commend Fairlie for the effort. There are a few drawbacks, however. First, Fairlie is British, and the book was originally published in the UK. Understandably, the author uses Great Britain as a case study over and over again, which means Americans will have to decide for themselves which ideas will or will not hold true in the US, which has a markedly different geography, culture, and agricultural system. Furthermore, Americans should be prepared with their British English dictionaries, as there are numerous terms, especially agricultural ones, that are not in use or have completely different meanings in the US (corn, for example). The second drawback is that there is almost no discussion about the ethical and health issues pertaining to meat-eating. Fairlie makes vegans out to be misguided hippies intent on saving the world, but in my experience, most people become vegetarians or vegans for health reasons, not environmental ones. Similarly, his comparison of meat versus plants is limited to caloric value, protein levels, and fat content. He completely ignores any other nutritional differences between the two types of food. Finally, the book is very poorly edited. There are typos throughout the entire thing, at a much higher rate than I would ever consider acceptable for a published book. Perhaps the proofreader was too caught up in the author's detailed analysis to do his own job.
I'd love to give this book a 5 star rating because it is, for the most part, extraordinarily well done. However, there are just a few too many negative issues for me. So, it gets a 4 star rating, but I encourage everyone to read this book and think long and hard about their food choices.
As relevant in 2020 than when it was published.

