£4.95 + £4.12 UK delivery
In stock. Sold by NJ Diagnostics
1-Click ordering is not available for this item.

Dispatch to:
To see addresses, please
Please enter a valid UK postcode.

Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon

Lonelec MultiECUScan Multi ECU Scan Adaptor Cables Plugs Set

5.0 out of 5 stars 1 customer review

Price: £4.95
In stock.
Dispatched from and sold by NJ Diagnostics.
3 new from £4.95
    This fits your .
  • Enter your model number above to make sure this fits.
  • Adaptors for MultiECUScan
  • 100% MultiECUScan Compatible

Product details

  • Boxed-product Weight: 259 g
  • Delivery Destinations: Visit the Delivery Destinations Help page to see where this item can be delivered.
    Find out more about our Delivery Rates and Returns Policy
  • Manufacturer reference: LEFESAD123
  • ASIN: B00A2AW3OE
  • Date first available at Amazon.co.uk: 5 Nov. 2012
  • Average Customer Review: 5.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (1 customer review)
  • Amazon Bestsellers Rank: 247,690 in Electronics (See Top 100 in Electronics)

Product description

Genuine Lonelec - Set of adaptors for use with MultiECUScan software (formerly FiatEcuScan). Latest up to date pin out. Our cables are quality moulded using the best materials including 26AWG cable. Made to last unlike some inferior cables on the market. MultiECUscan software works with Fiat, Alfa Romeo and Lancia vehicles as covered on their compatibility list. These adaptors allow you to easily access power steering, ABS, Airbags and low speed CAN BUS without having to constantly re-solder pins. The GREEN Adaptor allows you to cover ABS and Power Steering. The RED Adaptor allows you to access SRS (Airbags) The YELLOW Adaptor allows low speed CAN BUS communication

Customer Questions & Answers

Customer Reviews

5.0 out of 5 stars
5 star
4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star
See the customer review
Share your thoughts with other customers

Top Customer Reviews

Verified Purchase
does what it says on the tin
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse