You’ve got a Kindle.
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle Cloud Reader.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Enter your mobile phone or email address
By pressing ‘Send link’, you agree to Amazon's Conditions of Use.
You consent to receive an automated text message from or on behalf of Amazon about the Kindle App at your mobile number above. Consent is not a condition of any purchase. Message and data rates may apply.
Follow the author
OK
The Lomborg Deception: Setting the Record Straight About Global Warming Hardcover – 30 April 2010
| Howard Friel (Author) See search results for this author |
| Amazon Price | New from | Used from |
|
Kindle Edition
"Please retry" | — | — |
|
Hardcover
"Please retry" | £16.26 | — | £13.47 |
- ISBN-109780300161038
- ISBN-13978-0300161038
- PublisherYale University Press
- Publication date30 April 2010
- LanguageEnglish
- Dimensions13.97 x 2.06 x 20.96 cm
- Print length272 pages
Product description
Review
"The Lomborg Deception sets the record straight with a rigorous, readable body-blow to climate complacency."--Senator John Kerry--Senator John Kerry
"For those interested in the future of polar bears and Arctic sea ice, Howard Friel's Lomborg's Theorem clearly documents the inaccurate and utterly inadequate arguments that Bjorn Lomborg uses to erroneously suggest climate warming will have little negative effect on this bellwether mammal. The far greater tragedy is that misleading presentations such as those proffered by Lomborg may help to foster uncertainty in the public at large about the severity of the human causes of climate warming, and thus further delay the urgent need for the entire world to respond quickly to reduce our collective output of greenhouse gases."--Ian Stirling, Fellow of the Royal Society of Canada, Research Scientist Emeritus, Environment Canada--Ian Stirling
"Devastating. . . . Reputable scientists immediately smelled something fishy in Lomborg's work. Now Freil, a journalist, has found the source of the stink."--;I>Minneapolis Star Tribune
--James Lenfestey "Minneapolis Star Tribune "
"Compelling. . . . Anyone who picks up Cool It. . . should have Lomborg Deception within reach to decide for themselves whether Lomborg's main claim to authority--that environmentalists make it up while he provides accurate facts--is so much hot air."--;I>Newsweek
--Sharon Begley "Newsweek "About the Author
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Product details
- ASIN : 0300161034
- Publisher : Yale University Press (30 April 2010)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 272 pages
- ISBN-10 : 9780300161038
- ISBN-13 : 978-0300161038
- Dimensions : 13.97 x 2.06 x 20.96 cm
- Best Sellers Rank: 2,238,010 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- 1,003 in Environmental Philosophy
- 1,562 in Global Warming & Ecology
- 1,679 in Environmental Engineering
- Customer reviews:
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
Top reviews from United Kingdom
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
In Chapter One Friel proves, unsurprisingly, that Lomborg is not part of the `consensus that projected unprecedented warming with potentially catastrophic consequences if green house emissions were not significantly reduced'.
Chapter Two looks at the numbers of polar bears. Lomborg claimed that their numbers have risen, from 5,000 in the 1960s to 25,000 today. Friel cites a 2001 report by the International Union for the Conservation of Nature Polar Bear Specialist Group that there are between 21,500 and 25,000. Then he berates Lomborg for writing of a `stable' bear population when the report said `stationary'.
Al Gore said, "polar bears have been drowning in significant numbers." Friel seems to think that the Center for Biological Diversity's 2008 report proves this true when it wrote, "polar bears are at risk of drowning in large numbers" and "polar bear drowning events are expected". But that is not the same as saying that they are currently `drowning in significant numbers'.
Friel often misreads Lomborg. For example, Lomborg wrote, "Some of the largest colonies contain more than twenty thousand pairs [of Emperor penguins] each, several of which may be increasing." Friel writes, "penguin colonies in one of the areas (and not `several', as Lomborg wrote) `may be increasing'". But Lomborg's `several' referred to colonies not to areas.
Lomborg cites the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's 2007 estimate that sea levels will rise about a foot by 2100: Friel calls Lomborg's statement `narrowly accurate' and `not wholly inaccurate'. Yet Friel then tries to justify Gore's 20-feet rise estimate as `a not entirely hypothetical possibility'. Again, Friel quotes reports saying that sea levels could rise by five feet by 2100, without assessing how likely this is.
Friel quotes a 2002 conference of the American Geophysical Union, "The melting of Greenland glaciers and Arctic Ocean sea ice this past summer reached levels not seen in decades." He can't see that this wrecks the case for `unprecedented warming'. (If these levels were seen decades ago, they are not unprecedented.) Nor can they be a `record', yet The New York Times headlined the conference, `Arctic Ice is Melting at Record Levels, Scientists Say' (8 December 2002). This is the kind of exaggeration that Lomborg criticises.
Other examples include a study in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences which concluded that climate change is `largely irreversible' for the next 1000 years, and James Hansen writing, "If the present overshoot of this target CO2 [of 350 ppm] is not brief, there is a possibility of seeding irreversible catastrophic effects."
Again, the Worldwatch Institute said that we will have to end `the emission of carbon dioxide by 2050 to avoid catastrophic disruption to the world's climate'. The Independent's Michael McCarthy reported, "Lord Stern said new research done in the past two or three years had made it clear there were `severe risks' if global temperature rose by the predicted 4 degrees C to 7 degrees C by 2100. Agriculture would be destroyed and life would be impossible over much of the planet, the former World Bank chief economist said."
But the IPCC said in 2007, "Globally, the potential for food production is projected to increase with increases in local average temperature over a range of 1 to 3 degrees C, but above this it is projected to decrease." Yet Friel concludes, "It is also fair to say that Lomborg's prognosis that `we will be able to feed the world ever better' because of global warming was not supported by either Lomborg's own sources or the 2007 IPCC assessment of the issue."
The IPCC also said in 2007, "Abrupt climate changes, such as the collapse of the West Antarctica Ice Sheet, the rapid loss of the Greenland Ice Sheet or large-scale changes of ocean circulation systems, are not considered likely to occur in the 21st century, based on currently available model results."
So, I recommend the Lomborg Deception to anyone who has found Lomborg's work at all convincing. Read Friel and then make your choice between them. Compare the quality of analysis and rigour in Freil's work to Lombourg's and draw your own conclusions.
This book gets five stars not because its particularly fun bedtime reading but because it does an important job. Lomborg has got away with a lot by understanding how to make an argument look superficially convincing. Freil has done the painstaking work, for which I am grateful, of exposing what lies under the surface - and it's not pretty.