Limited Inc Hardcover – 1 Dec 1988
Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought
Enter your mobile number below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Getting the download link through email is temporarily not available. Please check back later.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
From the Back Cover
Limited Inc. is a major work in the philosophy of language by the celebrated French thinker Jacques Derrida. The book's two essays, 'Limited Inc.' and 'Signature Event Context, ' constitute key statements of the Derridean theory of deconstruction. They are perhaps the clearest exposition to be found of Derrida's most controversial idea. --This text refers to the Paperback edition.
About the Author
Jacques Derrida (1930-2004) was Director of Studies at the Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales and Professor of Humanities at the University of California, Irvine. Among the most recent of his many books to have been translated into English are Rogues (2005), Eyes of the University (2004), For What Tomorrow... with Elisabeth Roudinesco (2004), Counterpath with Catherine Malabou (2004), Negotiations (2002), Who's Afraid of Philosophy? (2002), and Without Alibi (2002). All of these have been published by Stanford University Press --This text refers to the Paperback edition.
What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?
Top Customer Reviews
Derrida proceeds via a close reading of Austin (largely _How to Do Things with Words_), tracing the latter's study of "performative" linguistic uses in transactions at least as various as wedding vows and the commencement of sporting events. Derrida devotes considerable attention to the specifics of the play of the "metaphysics of presense" in Austin (why, for example, the notion of the performative is advanced under the banner of "speech act" theory) via the topoi of the reading/writing distinction, the privilege granted to intention, and the "parasitic" nature of citation. Following the intimate detail of Austin's text, Derrida shows that, even as it attempts reductionist conclusions, there remains a trace of rigour in the form of highly nuanced considerations capable of radically altering the conclusions proposed by Austin.Read more ›
This is a difficult text and really has to be read and understood in its full context.
I can sympathise with the negative view below, but would stress that this is not really a text that should be given to under graduate students who are not being taught full on postmodern or post-stucturalist courses. Lets face it, being 'forced' to read a text of this nature is not a good foot to get off on. I suspect that the presence of such reading material on an under-graduate course is the outcome of a lecturer who does everything she can to show off her postmodern black belt - rather than being any valid essential reading.
Derrida is generally hard to read and this is part of a point he is trying to convey about the difficluties involved in interpreting texts. I feel amibivalent about this approach, it does serve to illustrate his point, however the downside is that it massively reduces the possiblity of the receptability of his thinking to the 'normal' academic reader.
In this respect, in living up to his principles, Derrida was very much his own worst rod-backing enemy - consequently he is always inevitably misunderstood. Thats the price you pay for turning up the heat in your own kitchen I guess.
Having said that, this is probably the easiest and most entertaining of his texts as the conflict between Searle and Derrida is a clash of two titans of modernist and postmodern approaches to philosophy. Most critics do not criticize Derrida directly, but usually 'dare' to take on ancillary writers or commentators around his thoughts (Habermas for example).Read more ›
I would only recommend reading Derrida if you're in the mood for mental frolicking, and generally want to screw up the way your mind works. Honestly, he takes it for a spin-dry, and the thing is it doesn't feel like it's come out in the wash. There are much better ways.
Derrida's philosophy, in my view, is a frivolous waste of time and not worth bothering with IN ANY SENSE. But, if you have to for an undergraduate course...