Kareco 9ct Yellow Gold Gents' Onyx and Diamond Set Celtic Claddagh Ring Size U

3.6 out of 5 stars 5 customer reviews

Currently unavailable.
We don't know when or if this item will be back in stock.
  • The Kareco brand includes a variety of designs from timeless classic pieces to those with a modern day contemporary twistged in a beautiful gift box
  • The collection is influenced by design inspiration from around the world
  • A perfect gift for yourself or that special person in your life
  • The product comes beautifully packaged in a gift box
Currently unavailable.
We don't know when or if this item will be back in stock.

Currently unavailable. We don't know when or if this item will be back in stock.

Special Offers and Product Promotions

  • Check out our Jewellery store for timeless classics to latest fashions.

  • Save on a huge selection of men's, women's and kids' jewellery and accessories in our Jewellery Deals store.

Product Specifications

Jewellery Information
Brand Name Kareco
Metal Stamp 9 ct (375)
Metal 9ct Yellow Gold
Gem Type Diamond
Setting Pavé
Total Metal Weight 3.69 Grams
Ring size U
Resizable No
Number of stones 3
Stone Weight 2.83 carats
Model number 9-RC076DI
Diamond Information
Lab Created No
Stone Shape Round
Minimum Colour HI
Minimum Total Carat Weight 0.03 carats


Product details

  • Boxed-product Weight: 41 g
  • Delivery Destinations: Visit the Delivery Destinations Help page to see where this item can be delivered.
    Find out more about our Delivery Rates and Returns Policy
  • Item model number: 9-RC076DI
  • ASIN: B000X6W3MY
  • Date first available at Amazon.co.uk: 19 Oct. 2007
  • Average Customer Review: 3.6 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (5 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Bestsellers Rank: 328,331 in Jewellery (See Top 100 in Jewellery)

Customer Questions & Answers

Customer Reviews

3.6 out of 5 stars
Share your thoughts with other customers

Top Customer Reviews

Ring Size: T Verified Purchase
Shall admit that it wasn't what I was originally looking for for my partner for Christmas, but the design intrigued me. Unfortunately, despite being barely worn due to needing re-sizing, within a couple of months on visiting a jeweller to do so, found that 2 of the clasps holding the stone have broken off and need replacing. Not recommended for quality in my experience.
Comment 13 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Ring Size: U Verified Purchase
A good likeness to the photo, except it isn't clear that the inside of the ring is hollowed out and not smooth.

Would benefit from a stronger setting for the Onyx insert/back plate that is loose and rattles a bit.

Would also be better with a wider shank, the part at the back of the hand, otherwise husband likes it.

Decided to return it as it was hurting his finger due to the inside of the band not being flush, and the shank being too narrow.

Such a shame as I love the design/concept of the ring.
Comment 13 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Ring Size: Z Verified Purchase
VERY VERY VERY NICE & I LOVE IT.
LOVELY RIGHT SIZE & DESCRIPTION.
WELL WORTH LOOKING IN AMAZON FOR & LOVING IT THANK YOU ALL.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Ring Size: S Verified Purchase
Extremely pleased,worth the money
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Ring Size: Z Verified Purchase
9ct Yellow Gold Gents' Onyx and Diamond Set Celtic Claddagh Ring Size Z
9ct Yellow Gold Gents' Onyx and Diamond Set Celtic Claddagh Ring Size Z on time thak you
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse