Justinian's Flea: Plague, Empire and the Birth of Europe Hardcover – 3 May 2007
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
"Ambitious and exciting, witty and elegant, this is a big book in every sense, and packed with big ideas. William Rosen takes one of history's great cause-and-effect problems and turns it into a work that is entertaining and illuminating in equal measure. Along the way he comes up with interpretations of a little-understood era that delight and sometimes dazzle. From the theological puzzles of Gnosticism, neo-Platonism and the Arian heresy through the pathology of a flea-bite to the appropriate use of heavy cavalry, the complicated and the convoluted become comprehensible... and fun." (Phil Craig, Co-Author Of Finest Hour: The Battle Of Britain, And Trafalgar: The Men, The Battle, The Storm)
"William Rosen doesn´t just give us the most believable, the most human and the most fully rounded Justinian ever. He also conjures up a vivid picture of the age, in a compelling style that makes his weighty learning light." (Felipe Fernandez-Armesto, Author Of Millennium And Civilizations)
What a richly detailed and thought-provoking book! I got stuck into
William Rosen's fascinating chronicle with all the appetite of a flea
settling on the brawny arm of one of Justinian's cataphracts." (Robert lacey, co-author of The Year 1000)
"We live at a time when the Pope's quotation of a Byzantine emperor can cause an international incident. William Rosen's fascinating new book offers a timely portrait of the greatest Byzantine emperor of them all - and explains, in compelling detail, how the golden age of Constantinople was blotted out by a catastrophe as momentous as any in history." (Tom Holland, author of Rubicon and Persian Fire)
"Justinian's Flea is narrative history writing at its best. Breathtaking in its scope, the book presents a confident mix of history, science, architecture, theology, military strategy, law, engineering and medicine to tell the story of how plague transformed the classical world and gave birth to mediaeval Europe. William Rosen's canvas stretches from China to Spain, and Britain to Arabia, and his intriguing cast of characters includes emperors, priests, soldiers, and engineers as well as rats, fleas and silkworms. Justinian's Flea transforms our understanding of many key events in the history of the last two thousand years, from the decline of Rome to the rise of Islam and beyond." (Karl Sabbagh, author of The Riemann Hypothesis)
Popular history at its best: an epic story in which the newly united Roman Empire under Justinian is decimated by bubonic plague.See all Product description
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
It really wasn't what I was expecting, and for heavens sake historians, can you please agree on a naming convention for the Persian Shahanshahs and stick to it?
This basically is what you'd get from Lloyd Clark if Kursk had happened in 545ce and all the evidence was mostly conjecture written by clinically depressed monks.
In some places the book shines, and at the least explained the climatic shift and its effect on y.pestis, not to mention the mechanism of y.pestis infection which is one of those things that makes you really wonder if there isn't an all powerful force controlling everything (if there is its probably sadistic/psychotic on this evidence) but some of the political machinations are glossed over a bit, some of which deserve more import than they're given.
For a theory that says the Plague Justiniana is the single event that boots modern Europe into life, the plague doesn't get very high billing and that the plague itself becomes mobile as a result of a massive caldera supereruption gets about a paragraph.
All in all a bit 'meh', too much concentration on the usual armies tramping here, there and everywhere and not enough on the physical background to the plague itself.. and the reasons why it kept popping up (poor harvests due to cooling, lack of food, weaker immunity in general & incipient sickness, and possibly lack of quality of the food that was available).
I'm ambivalent on this one, in some places genuinely investing and relevant to the subject at hand, in others, the relevance of the technical minutiae of building Hagia Sophia for example, while interesting, is somewhat irrelevant to epidemiology and the study thereof...
Full of facts, ideas and very readable, jumps from one theme to another sometimes in surprising directions. The in-depth description of the bacterium evolvement feels like another book.
Justinian as a person doesn't get enough attention and the influence of plague might not have been as important as his theory implies but I found the book enchanting and I have to re-read it at some point in the future.
The opening chapter is an introduction to the Byzantine empire, concentrating on the reign of Constantine the Great. The second chapter skates over the following two centuries very unsatisfactorily, seemingly in an attempt to get to Justinian as quickly as possible; but if that's the intention, why bother with such a superficial account of Constantine at all?
Much of the rest of the book stays with Justinian, but while some events from his reign are covered in great detail (there's a fairly good account of Belisarius, for instance), others are passed over in a mere sentence or not mentioned at all, and one searches in vain for any objective selection criteria. There are much better accounts of this period: John Julius Norwich's superb "Byzantium" triology, for example, manages to leave one with a much better appreciation of Justinian's life and times despite using far fewer words.
For a book which is supposed to show the impact of the plague on European life, it takes an astonishingly long time to get on to its subject matter. There are 325 pages of text, yet plague isn't mentioned until page 167, more than half way through the book. Plague then receives only two short chapters (much of the material here being in too much scientific detail to be able to hold the interest of the average history reader), before dropping out of the account other than for occasional afterthoughts. The book simply doesn't cover the material it claims to. There are laws against this kind of thing, you know.
There are subjective parallels with events of modern history, and pointless digressions throughout. The Persians are introduced only to be removed from the story on account of (allegedly) the threat of the plague, and towards the end of the book there is a diversion into the silk trade - for what purpose, it's hard to say.
And as for "the birth of Europe" - well, it receives precisely two and a half pages at the very end (yes, that's it - I'm not joking). These offer only a shallow and rather childish "what if" scenario, postulating that no plague would have meant no Holy Roman Empire, no Crusades, no Napoleon and no Hitler. What nonsense.
"Justinian's Flea" is a moderately interesting read of sixth century history, but it is no more than that. This is the first book by William Rosen, whom we learn has made his living more as a publisher than as a writer. One cannot help wondering whether a fellow-publisher backed this venture just to allow him to get one book to his own name. His own confession that this book was written in response to the question, "What would you do if you were unafraid to fail?" speaks for itself.
Grammar and punctuation confirm to American standards, which is irritating for readers of British English. There are errata throughout, which should have been picked up by even an inexperienced proofreader.