Buy Used
£2.77
+ £2.80 UK delivery
Used: Very Good | Details
Condition: Used: Very Good
Comment: Ships from the UK. Former Library books. Great condition for a used book! Minimal wear. 100% Money Back Guarantee. Your purchase also supports literacy charities.

Have one to sell?
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See all 2 images

How Much Is Enough?: Money and the Good Life Hardcover – 1 Aug 2012

4.5 out of 5 stars 6 customer reviews

See all formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price
New from Used from
Hardcover, 1 Aug 2012
£2.77

Top Deals in Books
See the latest top deals in Books. Shop now
click to open popover

Customers Viewing This Page May Be Interested In These Sponsored Links

  (What is this?)

Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.

  • Apple
  • Android
  • Windows Phone

To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.



Top Deals in Books
See the latest top deals in Books. Shop now

Product details

  • Hardcover: 243 pages
  • Publisher: Other Press (NY) (1 Aug. 2012)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 1590515072
  • ISBN-13: 978-1590515075
  • Product Dimensions: 14.7 x 2.6 x 22.4 cm
  • Average Customer Review: 4.5 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (6 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Bestsellers Rank: 1,073,934 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Customers Viewing This Page May Be Interested In These Sponsored Links

  (What is this?)

Product Description

Review

"The Skidelskys ask a pivotal question: Is there no end to our constant quest for more and more wealth? As the world economy stutters and we look for ways to restart the engine, their arguments pull us up short. Are we not prosperous enough already and missing a far richer life without the perpetual quest for needless economic growth?" --Nicholas Wapshott, author of "Keynes Hayek: The Clash That Defined Modern Economics".

"What perfect timing! "How Much is Enough?" is what every graying Baby Boomer I know is asking right now. The Skidelskys argue that time is not ONLY money, as many driven New Yorkers seem to think, and urge workaholic Americans to devote more of it to pursuing the good life. Sounds like wise advice to me. As my desk mate at the "New York Times" in the 1990s used to remind me at least once a day: All you really HAVE is your TIME ." --Sylvia Nasar, author of "Grand Pursuit: The Story of Economic Genius"

"The authors turn to historical fiction, philosophy, and political theory, drawing on Faust, Marx's critique of capitalism, and Aristotle's uses of wealth. Their conclusion that concepts like respect, friendship, and community are more likely to contribute to satisfaction and overall happiness than wealth makes for a fascinating, if cerebral, read." -"Publishers Weekly"

"Intriguingly, [the Skidelskys'] intellectual guiding star is not Marx or even Keynes but Aristotle: we are repeatedly brought back to Aristotle's bafflement at the idea that money itself could be regarded as a sort of agent or a sort of life-form, let alone a self-explanatory goal for human activity." -"Prospect "(UK)

"What perfect timing! "How Much is Enough"? is what every graying Baby Boomer I know is asking right now. The Skidelskys argue that time is not ONLY money, as many driven New Yorkers seem to think, and urge workaholic Americans to devote more of it to pursuing the good life. Sounds like wise advice to me. As my desk mate at the "New York Times" in the 1990s used to remind me at least once a day: All you really HAVE is your TIME ." Sylvia Nasar, author of"Grand Pursuit: The Story of Economic Genius"
"Deeply provocative and intellectually suggestive...Offers some bold and lucid proposals about what we can do to rein in the fever of reductive economism and toxic acquisitiveness." "Prospect," Rowan Williams, Archbishop of Canterbury
"The Skidelskys ask a pivotal question: Is there no end to our constant quest for more and more wealth? As the world economy stutters and we look for ways to restart the engine, their arguments pull us up short. Are we not prosperous enough already and missing a far richer life without the perpetual quest for needless economic growth?" Nicholas Wapshott, author of "Keynes Hayek: The Clash That Defined Modern Economics"
"The over-all thrust of their polemic is a welcome call to reinvigorate society's ethical aspect and bring about the good life for everyone." "The New Yorker"
""How Much Is Enough?" is a delightful book. It addresses a Big Question without the jargon and obfuscation that pollutes so much philosophy. The prose is lucid, and all the relevant issues are raised and addressed." "The Wall Street Journal"
The authors turn to historical fiction, philosophy, and political theory, drawing on Faust, Marx s critique of capitalism, and Aristotle s uses of wealth. Their conclusion that concepts like respect, friendship, and community are more likely to contribute to satisfaction and overall happiness than wealth makes for a fascinating, if cerebral, read. "Publishers Weekly"
A provocative and articulate discourse on the dismal science and moral philosophy. "Kirkus"
The Skidelskys move seamlessly from the abstract to the concrete; from philosophy to public policy. "The Independent
""There is a rigor in their view of leisure. It is productive, but not so much of things as of experiences animated by intrinsic motivation. Eliminate the propulsive force of self-interest narrowly pursued, and leisure becomes a form of social wellness, a striving for the common good rather than the individual accumulation of more and more." "Portland Book Review
"
"[An] intelligent, impassioned, provocative treatise to those who wonder if materialism is necessary to the good life." "Get Abstract"
"[B]reath-taking analysis of capitalism as a Faustian bargain with the devil." " Book News""

About the Author

Robert Skidelsky is Emeritus Professor of Political Economy at the University of Warwick. His biography of the economist John Maynard Keynes received numerous prizes, including the Lionel Gelber Prize for International Relations and the Council on Foreign Relations Prize for International Relations.
Edward Skidelsky is a lecturer at Exeter University, specializing in aesthetics and moral philosophy. He contributes regularly to the "New Statesman, Telegraph, "and "Prospect "on philosophy, religion, and intellectual history."


What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?

Customer Reviews

4.5 out of 5 stars
5 star
3
4 star
3
3 star
0
2 star
0
1 star
0
See all 6 customer reviews
Share your thoughts with other customers

Top Customer Reviews

Format: Hardcover
This book has been such a refreshing read. It transcends the jealous whingeing and blaming so prevalent in most books about today's economy, and makes you thing on a much bigger, broader scale about the system we live in, and whether it's truly serving us in the best possible way at the moment.

The book is objective,well reasoned and thoroughly engaging throughout. I didn't agree with every suggestion made at the end of the book, but it made me think about the way the world works today and how that system affects me personally in a way that no other book ever has. It's honest and unsensational in its language, which makes it far easier to engage with on a meaningful level.

Since finishing this book I've been thinking long and hard about the true value of money, its role versus its place in society, and how it both enables and frustrates the journey towards the "ideal lifestyle".

If every member of the House of Lords wrote books that were as challenging, carefully considered and genuinely concerned about the state of the modern individual in their nation, this country would be a much brighter and stronger place. Great stuff.
Comment 18 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Format: Hardcover
Maybe it's too early to call it a trend, but it's nice to see that some "establishment" figures in the US and UK have begun speaking out against economic growth as a policy for wealthy countries. Former Harvard president Derek Bok did so in 2010 with his book "The Politics of Happiness," and now so has Baron Robert Skidelsky, in this book written with his son, an academic philosopher.

Like Bok, the authors (S&S) make "happiness" a prominent theme in their argument. Their perspective on it, though, is rather different from his. Bok focused on social science research, in which people in various countries responded to surveys about their subjective happiness. S&S are (rightly, I believe) skeptical about a lot of this research, and focus instead on the ancient philosophical question of "What is a good life?" This sort of happiness, especially as conceived by Aristotle and other Athenian thinkers, refers not to a state of mind but to a "state of being," a matter of "public appraisal, not private awareness" (@98). They turn this into a public policy issue with their declaration, "[T]he first duty of the state is to realize, insofar as lies within its power, the good life for all its citizens" (@168).

S&S also don't shy away from declaring what they think the good life consists in. While some reviews have lampooned their suggestions, e.g., claiming they approve of upper-class pleasures like Valpolicella and disapprove of crack cocaine, by and large their list (Chap. 6) seems reasonable: health, security, respect, harmony with nature, friendship, "personality" (access to private space to be oneself), and "leisure" (activity not undertaken primarily for money, but for its own sake).
Read more ›
Comment 11 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Format: Hardcover
This is a very readable account of how, despite getting much richer since Keynes wrote his essay 'Economic possibilities for our grandchildren', we haven't had the concomitant drop in working hours Keynes forecast. The authors mine a rich stream of thought which considers capitalism a 'Faustian pact' with unseemly motives for the production of wealth. How this pact has got out of hand, with GDP growth changing from a means to bringing about the good life to the end pursued by government policy is the first argument of the book.

The authors also argue - following Aristotle, and echoing Michael Sandel in his book Justice: What's the Right Thing to Do? - that the draining of a moral and ethical discourse from public discussion of policy has merely obscured, rather than removed, the ethical stance behind political decisions. This is a welcome point, and along with their discussion of the 'Faustian pact' forms the most successful passage of the book.

So far, so good - but unfortunately the rest of the book is on shakier ground. The authors outline their own vision for 'the good life', which I felt was too subjective to be a programme with a real chance of being adopted by any mainstream political party. They make some valid criticisms of it, but nevertheless I feel the capabilities approach (developed by Amartya Sen and Martha Nussbaum) remains a much better guide for policy than their assertion that the good life be promoted by government.

Two chapters deal in turn with the new happiness economics promoted by Richard Layard and the green/sustainable movement.
Read more ›
Comment 5 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse


Feedback