Save on pre-loved Smartphones
Buy used
£3.16
FREE delivery 9 - 11 August. Order within 5 hrs 46 mins. Details
Used: Very Good | Details
Sold by Infinite_Books
Condition: Used: Very Good
Comment: Order will be shipped within 24 hours from our UK based warehouse. Clean, undamaged book with no damage to pages and minimal wear to the cover. We offer a full money back guarantee should you not be satisfied with your order in any way.
Only 4 left in stock.
Kindle app logo image

Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet or computer – no Kindle device required.

Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.

Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.

QR code to download the Kindle App

Follow the author

Something went wrong. Please try your request again later.

Hawthorn and Child Paperback – 5 July 2012

3.4 out of 5 stars 96 ratings

Hawthorn and Child are mid-ranking detectives tasked with finding significance in the scattered facts. They appear and disappear in the fragments of this book along with a ghost car, a crime boss, a pick-pocket, a dead racing driver and a pack of wolves. The mysteries are everywhere, but the biggest of all is our mysterious compulsion to solve them. In Hawthorn & Child, the only certainty is that we've all misunderstood everything.

Product description

About the Author

Keith Ridgway is a Dubliner and the author of the novels The Long Falling, The Parts and Animals, as well as the collection of stories Standard Time and the novella Horses. His books have won awards and acclaim in Ireland and internationally and are translated widely. He lived in North London for eleven years. He now lives somewhere else.

Product details

  • Publisher ‏ : ‎ Granta Books
  • Publication date ‏ : ‎ 5 July 2012
  • Language ‏ : ‎ English
  • Print length ‏ : ‎ 288 pages
  • ISBN-10 ‏ : ‎ 1847087418
  • ISBN-13 ‏ : ‎ 978-1847087416
  • Dimensions ‏ : ‎ 13.9 x 1.9 x 21.4 cm
  • Best Sellers Rank: 4,215,949 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
  • Customer reviews:
    3.4 out of 5 stars 96 ratings

About the author

Follow authors to get new release updates, plus improved recommendations.
Keith Ridgway
Brief content visible, double tap to read full content.
Full content visible, double tap to read brief content.

Keith Ridgway is from Dublin, Ireland. He is the author of the novels A Shock (Winner of the 2022 James Tait Black Prize for Fiction), Hawthorn & Child, Animals, The Parts, and The Long Falling (filmed as Où Va La Nuit). His writing has appeared in The New Yorker, Granta, Zoetrope - All Story, Stinging Fly, and others. His is a winner of the Prix Femina Étranger, The Rooney Prize for Irish Literature, and the O. Henry Award. He lives in London.

Customer reviews

3.4 out of 5 stars
96 global ratings

Review this product

Share your thoughts with other customers

Customers say

Customers praise the book's originality and find it a masterclass in character development. However, the writing quality receives mixed reactions, with one customer describing it as amazing while another finds it poorly written. Moreover, the pacing and narrative quality are criticized for being difficult to follow and having unresolved storylines. Additionally, several customers find the book boring after a while.

3 customers mention ‘Originality’3 positive0 negative

Customers appreciate the book's originality, with one describing it as wonderfully unique and another noting it as the best novel of 2012.

"...a world where the bestsellers are by and large unchallenging, this is original and intelligent, and also subtly funny...." Read more

"...an advance on that fine book, and augments Ridgeway's status as a brilliant artist, a writer no-one that wishes to consider themselves familiar with..." Read more

"A wonderfully unique book. And a masterclass of character and originality." Read more

9 customers mention ‘Pacing’3 positive6 negative

Customers have mixed opinions about the pacing of the book, with several finding it difficult to follow.

"...I really found it hard work and admit that I skimmed a good deal of some chapters. It is unconventional and boring...." Read more

"...This is a book which is all about the details: the ones we don't know, the ones we invent to replace them, and the exquisite ones Ridgway provides..." Read more

"Fragmentary, post-modern narrative; it's a detective story where nothing is detected. There's a story, but it's not linear or sequential...." Read more

"...Plenty of confusion, without any sense of resolution...." Read more

6 customers mention ‘Character development’3 positive3 negative

Customers have mixed opinions about the character development in the book.

"...In some of the sections, the title characters are central...." Read more

"...Plenty of confusion, without any sense of resolution. Plenty of broken characters, but we never really see why they're broken nor do they change or..." Read more

"...Each section offers plenty in the way of character, and stylish writing, and could - as some already have - stand alone as short fiction...." Read more

"...The whole thing was very disjointed, jumping between characters heads and situations in a way that I found incredibly difficult to follow." Read more

5 customers mention ‘Writing quality’3 positive2 negative

Customers have mixed opinions about the writing quality of the book, with some finding it amazing and witty, while others describe it as poorly written and hard to read.

"...Each section offers plenty in the way of character, and stylish writing, and could - as some already have - stand alone as short fiction...." Read more

"...It didn't live up to the hype. It reads like a bunch of short stories, none of which reach an acceptable conclusion and I was completely..." Read more

"I'm still not sure what this book is about. The writing was amazing but I really struggled with it" Read more

"Hard work to read, weak story line, poor character development.... wasted a couple of hours on this and won't be reading any more of his 'books'." Read more

5 customers mention ‘Narrative quality’0 positive5 negative

Customers find the narrative quality of the book unsatisfactory, with one customer noting the unresolved stories and another mentioning the abrupt ending.

"...Ridgway has been, I think, braver than Mitchell. The stories here are unresolved, but they are not incomplete...." Read more

"...and Child is, so I knew roughly what to expect: an unconventional narrative structure, a lack, by most definitions, of discernible plot, and a book..." Read more

"...In fact, there was no resolution at all. The book ends as pointlessly and abrubtly as it began. Avoid." Read more

"...It reads like a bunch of short stories, none of which reach an acceptable conclusion and I was completely stunned when I read the last page to find..." Read more

3 customers mention ‘Boredom’0 positive3 negative

Customers find the book boring after a while.

"...book to be intriguing, and then just poorly constructed and boring after a while...." Read more

"...It is unconventional and boring. You really do need at least some connections between chapters however small to enable you to see...." Read more

"...Deeply disappointing." Read more

Top reviews from United Kingdom

  • Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 5 July 2012
    Hawthorn & Child was originally subtitled, on its publisher's website, `A Set of Misunderstandings'. The misunderstandings might begin in trying to define it. It's a series of stories which is really a novel, about two London police detectives and the people they encounter. It begins with an unsolvable mystery, when a young man is shot from a passing car on a quiet north London street. The brief information provided by the victim as he lies on the hospital table ("They poked and peered at the body. They tubed the body and they hooked it up. They shifted and bound the body") becomes the bedrock of a police investigation, a grand structure spun around no more than air. This is a book which is all about the details: the ones we don't know, the ones we invent to replace them, and the exquisite ones Ridgway provides us with along the way. Details, like this brief phone exchange between Hawthorn and his brother, which speaks of years in a couple of lines:

    --How's the thing?

    --What thing?

    --The crying.

    Hawthorn made a face and looked out of the window.

    --It's fine.

    The imprecision of language is everywhere. Here, Hawthorn's brother wants to ask but can't bring himself to be specific. Elsewhere, when investigating the shooting, Hawthorn and Child take a witness's response to a question ("Not really") as an opening, when really it's just a loose end. They are desperate to make things fit. "We usually don't decide anything about things that don't fit. They just don't fit. So we leave them out." In this, they are like all of us, even when we are reading this book and trying to join together the pieces of the narrative. (Ridgway: "We want to tell ourselves and our days and our lives as stories, and these things are not stories.")

    In some of the sections, the title characters are central. Child finds himself in a hostage negotiation with a young man who seems to be in a religious cult of one, and whose sense of identity is mangled. Hawthorn, straining for human contact, finds it - sort of - in a clever sequence which cuts between a riot and an orgy, and where it's not always possible to see which is which.

    "There are certain things Hawthorn wants to do. There are things he doesn't want to do. The line between these things tickles him, like a bead of sweat down his back."

    In other places, Hawthorn and Child are merely in the background, seen at a distance, or referred to. Ridgway gets around having to clunkingly name them by giving Hawthorn distinctive features that can be described by others: he cries a lot ("How's the thing?") and there's something, perhaps related, wrong with his face. "His face was crooked." "Like he was peeking through a keyhole." "He looks somehow off kilter." The risk here is that you get something like David Mitchell's scar identifier that joined the characters in Cloud Atlas, which looked tricksy and needless. Cloud Atlas, in fact, is not a bad starting point for comparison with Hawthorn & Child. With his book, Mitchell wanted to go further than Calvino had in If on a winter's night a traveller, by finishing all the stories he began. He did it, and the cumulative nimbleness was impressive; but I felt there was something missing in the heart region, and I wonder now whether the resolution of the stories contributed to it. Resolving a story can involve the author in so much contortion and knot-tying that the ugliness of the ending spoils the beauty that went before. Ridgway has been, I think, braver than Mitchell. The stories here are unresolved, but they are not incomplete. There is nothing missing, no sense that the stories peter out. The narrative pull within each one is strong, and they all leave you wanting more. What more could we ask for?

    Underlying all this, or stretching over it, is the story of Hawthorn and Child themselves. This is not a buddy cop story. They are on the trail of a gangster, Mishazzo. They work together, with contrasting approaches. Hawthorn is unsubtle, Child more solicitous: he gets on with people more easily; is happier, too. In their work, Child works things out, separates the possible from the fanciful. Hawthorn doesn't want to exclude the fanciful. He is searching for meaning, for something to put in the gaps. He thinks about things and people that might explain other things and other people to him. He "thought about men, various men, whom he moved about his mind experimentally like furniture." These enquiries are futile, though that is their purpose. A narrator of one of the stories says, "Knowing things completes them. Kills them. They fade away, decided and over and forgotten. Not knowing sustains us." That narrator, from the story `How We Ran the Night', is thoroughly unpleasant, and somehow frightening. ("I think of Trainer hanging in his attic. It must be worth knowing, what makes a man do that.") There is a fair amount of shiver-inducing nastiness in Hawthorn & Child, including as many ugly deaths as you might expect in a book about policemen. Yet there is tenderness all the way through, not least in the grudging pity I felt for Hawthorn. His tragedy in a minor key makes him one of the strongest fictional creations I've encountered in some time.

    Hawthorn & Child exhaustively answers the question: What do you want from a book? There are likeable characters too: in `Goo Book', a story of the thoughts that lie too deep to say in Mishazzo's driver's love affair (first published in The New Yorker); and in `Rothko Eggs' (first published in Zoetrope All-Story). There are plots and stories, page-turning and teasing. There is innovation -- it is structurally bold, and eye-opening in subject matter (a premiership referee who sees ghosts would fit that bill). It kicks the reader out of their comfort zone. It has lines that zing and lines that hum, as in the voice-driven `Marching Songs', which as a sustained piece of fictional prose, could hardly be bettered. Could it? Read it yourself.
    37 people found this helpful
    Report
  • Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 21 September 2012
    Generally I agree with the other reviewers, who at the time of writing have all blessed the book with 5 stars. What I wasn't sure of when I flipped over the last page was whether this amounted, ultimately, to more than the sum of its parts. It's not a novel in the traditional sense, more a sequence of short stories that bear a tangential relation to each other. Each section offers plenty in the way of character, and stylish writing, and could - as some already have - stand alone as short fiction. But....

    Then again, maybe I have just lived a very sheltered life! I found myself struggling to imagine Hawthorn's gay rugby-style orgies, or get any sense of the oddly-named Mishazzo, whom they are ostensibly chasing, and the fantasy narrative of the wolves didn't work for me and seemed an odd inclusion.

    Overall though I enjoyed reading it. In a world where the bestsellers are by and large unchallenging, this is original and intelligent, and also subtly funny. I would happily read other work by Ridgway, and bought 'The Spectacular', on the strength of this. 'Spectacular' is a related short story, and could easily have been another section in the novel, which seems to illustrate the strengths and weaknesses of the unusual structure.
    8 people found this helpful
    Report
  • Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 22 January 2019
    I found this book to be intriguing, and then just poorly constructed and boring after a while. After reading the fantastic "There but for the" by Ali Smith, Ridgeway's attempt at perspectives seemed weak and missed every time. I didn't care about any of the characters, and felt that it tried too hard to be shocking.
    One person found this helpful
    Report
  • Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 13 August 2021
    I'm still not sure what this book is about. The writing was amazing but I really struggled with it
  • Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 27 October 2014
    I came to this book following a recommendation in another authors blog and as such did not read any of the reviews posted on Amazon. Big mistake.

    I guess if I had some warning what this book was going to be like it may have sat better with me. I really found it hard work and admit that I skimmed a good deal of some chapters. It is unconventional and boring. You really do need at least some connections between chapters however small to enable you to see.

    Maybe I am just not bright enough and maybe you need an IQ of 200 to get at least some enjoyment out of it. I disagree with some of the reviewers that are printed on the dust jacket. This book is not brilliant, it is not funny, it has plot but only in individual chapters. It just left me feeling numb, bored and wishing I knew what the hell it all was about.
    One person found this helpful
    Report

Top reviews from other countries

  • Leitir
    5.0 out of 5 stars A strange, "unputdownable", book!
    Reviewed in the United States on 5 June 2013
    This is a book like no other I have read, and I can't even say if that is a positive or negative judgement! I can certainly say that I was hardly able to put it down, that I found it compelling reading. But if you were to ask me why that was, I would be lost for words. The last thing this book seems to be is lost for words. And yet, as the story itself says in one of its many self-referential loops, there are gaps - many of them. But these gaps, which have no breadth, depth or width, seem to be the black holes that suck your imagination and attention inexorably inwards. This may seem like a trite statement, but the book is all about Hawthorn and Child, and it is not about them at all. Make of that what you will!
  • Amazon Customer
    5.0 out of 5 stars Answer please
    Reviewed in Canada on 22 March 2013
    I am extremely upset that I could not purchase "The Spectacular . . . ."short story attached to Hawthorn and Child in the USA and the UK for $0.99. You still have not responded to my request for an explanation.
  • Amazon Customer
    4.0 out of 5 stars Interesting book
    Reviewed in the United States on 10 February 2022
    Inconsistent style troublesome.
  • Elizabeth
    5.0 out of 5 stars Wonderful
    Reviewed in the United States on 26 August 2014
    What a brilliant book.

    I hesitated before buying Hawthorn and Child. Some reviews made me think the unconventional structure and lack of resolution to the stories might be unsatisfying. I like the crime genre, but there's nothing worse than the kind of ending that teases you and leaves you hanging.

    Thankfully Hawthorn and Child is not a tease. The story strands in the book don't feel in any way incomplete. They're fascinating and well written and provocative (in the best possible way).

    I'll can tell I'll be rereading this one many times. Highly recommended.
  • J. Kidwell
    3.0 out of 5 stars Someone called it the anti-novel
    Reviewed in the United States on 12 May 2013
    Yes, it is definitely the anti novel. All of these stories that you keep expecting to come together. Yet they do not. Sad really. This could have been so much better.