Shop now Shop now Shop now See more Shop all Amazon Fashion Cloud Drive Photos Shop now Learn More Shop now DIYED Shop now Shop Fire Shop Kindle Shop now Shop now

Customer Reviews

3.8 out of 5 stars
3.8 out of 5 stars
5 star
4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star
Format: Paperback|Change
Price:£22.99+ Free shipping with Amazon Prime

Your rating(Clear)Rate this item
Share your thoughts with other customers

There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.

on 18 April 2015
Godel's Incompleteness Theorems were a revolution in mathematics and there were repercussions and misunderstandings that rippled out into other fields. The main theorem first appeared in an Austrian journal in 1931 and can be stated very simply.

In any consistent formal system S within which it is possible to perform a minimum amount of elementary arithmetic, there are statements that can neither be proved nor disproved.

The consequences are enormous, in that it means that in any system that can be used to perform arithmetic, there will be theorems that can never be verified as either true or false. In other words, some knowledge will forever be unattainable within that system. Of course, this does not preclude adding additional axioms that will allow other theorems to be proved.

Franzen does an excellent job in explaining the incompleteness theorems in a manner that can be understood by people with a limited knowledge of mathematics. While there are few places where a high school mathematics education is not sufficient to understand a more technical argument, it will be enough to understand and appreciate the theorems.

My favorite parts of the book were the sections devoted to "applications" of the incompleteness theorem outside of mathematics. Some examples are from religion, political science and philosophy. Godel's theorems are used to "prove" that no religion can contain a complete set of answers and that any constitution must of necessity be incomplete. Human thought is also interpreted in the context of the incompleteness theorems. The statement is:

Insofar as humans attempt to be logical, their thoughts form a formal system and are necessarily bound by Godel's theorem.

This statement and others related to the nature of human thought are examined in detail. The philosophy of Ayn Rand is also examined as a system that must of necessity be incomplete. This book would be an excellent supplemental text for a philosophy course where the nature of truth is examined. It would also be a very good choice for a course in the philosophy of mathematics.

Published in Journal of Recreational Mathematics, reprinted with permission.
0Comment|Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 3 March 2016
I found this book clarifying on many uses of Godel's Theorem and on mathematics or science in general. Torkel Franzen's insights were sobering and demystifying. I found myself shedding a few preconceptions and misconceptions.
However, this book is definitely NOT for persons without a mathematical background. I agree with other reviewers on this one.
It felt like when Torkel Franzen was writing he was skipping steps in his thought process which to him as a mathematician were trivial but to the reader are not. I have a Computer Science degree but I had to re-read many paragraphs to figure out how and why the author was reaching his conclusion.
0Comment|Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 8 August 2009
Godel's theorem is tossed about with wild abandon, particularly by people who don't really understand it - and I certainly would not claim to understand all it's subtleties - and this is a great little book to help you clear some of the fog. It is worth noting that Godel's theorem is quite limited in practical import, a large number of the theories in Mathematics do not fit the criteria for Godel's theorem and one can safely say that Physics has far from complete in terms of working out the consequences of its theories. For example there is a million dollars waiting for you if you can mathematically prove there is mass in the universe.

A quick example of the sort of things that this book helps to make clear. For ages I didn't understand the flaw in the standard philosophical argument about how Godel's theorem "shows" that you can "know" a statement is true but not prove it... I always thought it was due to the lack of non-contradiction between the statement and the axioms but somehow this didn't seem to work. The claim is that as Godel's theorem states that if T is a consistent theory then there is a statement P that says it cannot be proved within T. Well it must be true because otherwise there would be a proof! Simple right? Well no, because it is only true if T is consistent which of course you can't.... worth the price just for clarifying that.
33 comments| 5 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 15 February 2010
I really wanted to read this, a book on Godel's Theorems and what they really mean, and importantly, what they don't mean.

I have no trouble with the subject but the writing style here is terrible. Like too many maths books the writing itself puts off readers, not the subject matter itself.

I gave up and started reading the more promising An Introduction to Godel's Theorems (Cambridge Introductions to Philosophy). I may come back to this one.
0Comment| One person found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse