Buy new:
£9.78£9.78
FREE delivery:
Feb 10 - 13
Dispatches from: HUB OF BOOKS Sold by: HUB OF BOOKS
Buy Used: £3.59
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet or computer – no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
The Good, The Bad and The Multiplex Paperback – 1 Sept. 2011
| Amazon Price | New from | Used from |
|
Kindle Edition
"Please retry" | — | — |
|
Audible Audiobooks, Unabridged
"Please retry" |
£0.00
| Free with your Audible trial | |
|
Paperback, Illustrated
"Please retry" | £9.16 | £1.19 |
- Kindle Edition
£2.99 Read with Our Free App -
Audiobook
£0.00 Free with your Audible trial - Paperback
£9.7822 Used from £1.19 1 New from £9.78
Enhance your purchase
If blockbusters make money no matter how bad they are, then why not make a good one for a change? How can 3-D be the future of cinema when it's been giving audiences a headache for over a hundred years? Why pay to watch films in cinemas that don't have a projectionist but do have a fast-food stand? And, in a world in which Sex and the City 2 was a hit, what the hell are film critics for?
Outspoken, opinionated and hilariously funny, The Good, The Bad and The Multiplex is a must for anyone who has ever sat in an undermanned, overpriced cinema and asked themselves: 'How the hell did things get to be this terrible?'
- Print length336 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherRandom House Books
- Publication date1 Sept. 2011
- Dimensions13.97 x 2.54 x 21.59 cm
- ISBN-101847946038
- ISBN-13978-1847946034
Frequently bought together

- +
- +
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Product description
Review
"Kermode has nutsy-boltsy knowledge, fierce and idiosyncratic enthusiasms ... and some very interesting things to say" (Guardian)
"As impressive as it is entertaining ... Takes a wrecking ball to the studio chicanery" (Word)
"Expertly written, funny and fascinating" (Shortlist)
"Frankly alarming" (Metro)
Book Description
From the Back Cover
If blockbusters make money no matter how bad they are, then why not make a good one for a change? How can 3-D be the future of cinema when it's been giving audiences a headache for over a hundred years? Why pay to watch films in cinemas which don' t have a projectionist but do have a fast-food stand? And, in a world in which Sex and the City 2 was a hit, what the hell are film critics for?
Outspoken, opinionated and hilariously funny,The Good, the Bad and the Multiplex is a must for anyone who has ever sat in an undermanned, overpriced cinema and asked themselves: 'How the hell did things get to be this terrible?'
'Mark Kermode lives, breathes and eats movies' Guardian
'Insanely passionate, and brilliantly subjective' Word
'More opinions than Delia Smith has baking trays' Sunday Times
About the Author
Product details
- Publisher : Random House Books (1 Sept. 2011)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 336 pages
- ISBN-10 : 1847946038
- ISBN-13 : 978-1847946034
- Dimensions : 13.97 x 2.54 x 21.59 cm
- Best Sellers Rank: 1,014,140 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- 998 in Film Guides & Reviews
- 1,846 in Humorous Essays (Books)
- 3,233 in Film History & Criticism (Books)
- Customer reviews:
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings, help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyses reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from United Kingdom
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
I generally enjoyed the work as it was pretty much what I was expecting - radio-Mark on the the printed page. However I did finish the book *slightly* disappointed - with the editing - and as a result the book was merely Good when it should have been Great.
Kermode's rants were all there - agree or disagree with them they are compelling reading, and you can't beat a *passionate* critic. The problems I found were two fold. Firstly, I started to notice a niggly habit in the writing where the author would refer to his previous book simply by saying 'see previous book'. Not wildly helpful for me, as I hadn't read it - but hardly a world-ending problem. The real problem lay in the contrast between this, and his increasing habit of restating in later chapters points he had made quite adequately in previous ones. I found myself muttering at the page 'Yes, I KNOW that's what you said in the last chapter - I just READ the last chapter - how do you think I got to THIS chapter?' whenever he did this, whereas when he said simply 'see last book' with no further explanation I was ranting that 'I *can't* see the last book - I didn't *read* the last book - what am I, telepathic?'. This kind of inverted referencing persisted through the whole book, and whilst it is tempting to blame the author I think the editor should have taken a stronger hand here.
My feelings about the editing were compounded by Chapter 6. Chapter 6 FELT like it was just a long list of non-English language horror flicks that Mark really liked in the original (subtitled) version, followed by a list of the English language remakes that were rubbish (in his view). I think he made his point early on, and to keep repeating it, and to keep on at the same genre became tedious. How about foreign action/romance/thriller/period/sci-fi etc. genre films? How about making a counter point and looking at foreign language versions of English language tales, to see if non-English/American film producers are better at the remake than Hollywood? Chapter 6 - unfortunately the last full chapter - just got stuck for me - and again I have to blame the editor. Up to this point it was a 5 star book. Afterwards - well that chapter on it's own just dragged and dragged. In retrospect, it feels like a book comprising 6 long articles, and the editor didnt have the heart to cut down chapter 6 because it would have made the work lopsided.
Now, I recognise I've focussed on the negative here - so to be fair most of the book is a good old romp through Kermode's rabid (and encyclopaedic) mind - and was entirely delightful. Just read his other book first (to find out about the references - and tell me what they all meant) and skip chapter 6. Oh, and have a word with the editor, someone. . .
It some respects it's a bit of a regurgitation of what Kermode says each week on his show, I say it's a problem, but it's not a bad problem, because it's a great read and has convinced me to add the original Dark Water to my LoveFilm list. And as far as opinionated film literature goes, it's certainly one of the better reads.
Where the BBC has to balance opinion, this doesn't have to adhere to any policy, but Kermode is still pretty balanced on some subjects - Even on the topic of 3D; which I have to agree with; but agreeing with the author isn't as satisfying as being challenged, which this book doesn't do (hence it loosing a star).. but I'd recommend it to those who enjoy Michael Bay movies and have never seen a subtitled film, as a literary kick up the bum.
...and hello to Jason Issacs.
Recommended for Kermode and Mayo listeners or anyone else with an interest in cinema.
Well written and appropriately paced the book recounts a number of key causes of the downfall of the cinema in a balanced and measured manner. The real pleasure of this book is that it puts into words the feeling you get when you visit your local Multiplex to see a film you have been waiting to see for only to leave the cinema wishing you had not have bothered. Nothing to do with the quality of motion pictures but the way that actually viewing the content is made purely secondary to the sale of fast food.
A terrific light read all round.







