- Also check our best rated Portable Dvd Player reviews
Girl With A Pearl Earring 
Fulfilment by Amazon (FBA) is a service Amazon offers sellers that lets them store their products in Amazon's warehouses, and Amazon directly does the picking, packing, shipping and customer service on these items. Something Amazon hopes you'll especially enjoy: FBA items are eligible for and for Amazon Prime just as if they were Amazon items.
If you’re a seller, Fulfilment by Amazon can help you grow your business. Find out more about the programme.
- Choose from over 13,000 locations across the UK
- Prime members get unlimited deliveries at no additional cost
- Find your preferred location and add it to your address book
- Dispatch to this address when you check out
Frequently bought together
Customers who bought this item also bought
In order to support her family, seventeen year old Griet becomes a maid in the house of Johannes Vermeer and soon attracts the master painters attention. Although worlds apart in upbringing and social standing, Vermeer recognizes her intuitive understanding of his work and slowly draws her into his mysterious world of art and passion.
Whilst she falls increasingly under Vermeers spell, his volatile family quickly grows jealous of her. Maria, his shrewd mother-in-law, struggles to maintain the familys lifestyle, but seeing that Griet inspires Vermeer, takes the decision to let their relationship develop. Van Ruijven, also sensing the intimacy between master and maid, commissions Vermeer to paint Griets portrait. The result will be one of the greatest paintings ever created but at what cost?
You wouldn't think a movie could look like a Vermeer painting, but Girl with a Pearl Earring is filmed with an amazing range of luminous glows that evoke the Dutch artist's masterworks. Of course, it helps that much of the movie focuses on Scarlett Johansson (Lost in Translation, Ghost World), whose creamy skin and full lips have a luminosity of their own. Johansson plays Griet, a maid in the household of Johannes Vermeer (Colin Firth), who finds herself in a web of jealousy, artistic inspiration, and social machinations. Though the pace is slow, Girl with a Pearl Earring genuinely conveys some sense of an artist's process, as well as offering many chaste yet sensual moments between Firth and Johansson. Also featuring Essie Davis as Vermeer's bitter wife and Tom Wilkinson (In the Bedroom) as a wealthy patron with eyes for Griet. --Bret Fetzer
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
150 customer reviews
Review this product
Read reviews that mention
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Scarlett Johansson is superbly cast as Griet, her natural resemblance to the girl in the famous painting is uncanny and her performance is absolutely wonderful. Colin Firth is excellent as always as Vermeer. The supporting cast is equally good, with Essie Davis as the painter's jealous wife and Tom Wilkinson as his rather disagreeable rich patron who is quite obsessed with Griet himself. Cillian Murphy gets to kiss Johansson as the young butcher boy who is smitten with the girl, and Judy Parfitt delivers a befittingly intimidating performance as the painter's mother in law. Joanna Scanlan is absolutely delicious as the senior servant and cook in the Vermeer household.
The film is a pure joy to watch. The DVD has optional English subtitles and various extra features including a making of featurette with snippets from interviews with Scarlett Johansson, Colin Firth and Cillian Murphy, a goodly selection of deleted scenes, and two commentary tracks, one with the film makers (director and producer), the other with the writers of the source novel and screenplay.
Little is actually known about Johannes Vermeer (1632-75). He is thought to have painted slowly, sparingly. His style is meticulous, unrushed. Few canvases were produced (it is thought) and he was not prominent in art circles in his lifetime. His paintings fell into neglect for two centuries after his death, revived by the French, not the Dutch, in particular the influential critic Théophile Thoré-Bürger and the novelist Marcel Proust, who thought Vermeer’s “View of Delft” among the most beautiful landscapes ever painted. From then on (since the late 19th century) he has been considered a Master, his paintings (all 34 of them in existence) valued in the millions.
Tracy Chevalier wrote a fine novel (same title) on which the film is based. Naturally, since next to nothing is known about Vermeer apart from basic facts recorded in public and legal documents, the novelist had to use her imagination to bring the story to life. The serving girl Griet in the Vermeer household (played beautifully by Scarlett Johannson) is Tracy’s inspired creation. She is the girl who will sit for Vermeer wearing both the famous pearl and longing smile, the lips slightly wet with subtle dashes of glazed white. Her sad eyes also tell a tale of longing, or so we might suppose.
What was she, whoever she was, to Vermeer? Naturally, we cannot know. Instead, the painting has to tell us things we may want it to say to us. Tracy and Peter Webber may have got it right. It could be that Vermeer longed for her as much as she longs for him, or for something in him that inspires her look. This Mona Lisa of the North, as she has been called, did not come out of nothing. She looks for all the world as if she wants to be kissed.
Vermeer (played superbly by a long-haired, stoic Colin Firth) was a Protestant who married into a Catholic minority family in Delft. Why did he do it? Some art historians say it had to do with social climbing. The family of his wife Catharina were well off, or better off than Vermeer’s, his a family which seems to have been somewhat disreputable. Rumours of debt and scandal hounded the family. An uncle, for instance, spent time in prison. Renouncing his Protestant faith in predominantly Protestant Holland would not have been easy for Vermeer, especially since his conversion was to Catholicism, the religion of hated Spain, a country Holland had been at war with during the 16th and 17th centuries.
Did he love his wife? Well, he loved her enough to produce 15 children, if love has anything to do with such a process. But if he was not well off, why the large family? Many speculative reasons of course: Catholic family; poor contraception, if any; high infant mortality; custom of the day. In the film we see his brood but never get to know any of them. We aren’t even given their names. They figure in none of his paintings, so in a way they are faceless, not just nameless, and lost to posterity. They may have been the children produced for his wife, family, church, tradition and duty, more than for his private joy.
The subjects he mainly chose were people going about their business: the music teacher, the book and letter readers, the serving girls and cooks in their kitchens. Political turmoil in the world beyond is not present in his interiors. It’s as if real peace and freedom exist here behind closed doors, in privacies that cannot be interrogated. His subjects are shown in repose, not happy or sad, just serene and peaceful, at home in their own skins and surroundings.
He is like the French painter Chardin (1699-1779) in this regard. Both seem to say this is where profundity lies — here in the heart of simplicity.
The film shows this simplicity. The artist sketches, mixes paints, sits with his easel and canvases, eats at the family dinner table, sleeps in his own bed in the studio more often than in the one shared with his wife. He’s around people but seems solitary, absorbed by his own thoughts and visions. His family treat him as eccentric, as indeed he is, as indeed any artist perhaps has to be to carry on. Beauty enchants him: the play of light, the texture of clouds, colours and the complexity of feeling their blending brings. His eye is keen. He observes everything well. He also uses optics to enhance what he sees, science a part of his art.
Griet comes to the Vermeer home to do ordinary household tasks: sweeping up, dusting, washing clothes and crockery. She has no proper education, just does what working-class girls did in those days — drudgery, the chores others would not do. But as time passes she begins to catch Vermeer’s eye. An aesthetic eye, it must be said, not a lecherous one. He sees beauty in her, but it’s a beauty radiant with character and intelligence, not the standard sort that serving wenches are supposed to bring and have.
He is intrigued. He likes how she moves when she dusts the studio loft. There’s something natural in the way she catches the light. He asks her about art. What does she think? She’s not used to saying what she might think about it. She may not even have thought deeply about her own thoughts. But Vermeer wants to know anyway. He wonders if her mind contains some of the beauty her form displays.
It does. His intuition about her was right. He asks her to buy paints for him. She feels honoured to do so. Later, as time passes, he wishes her to help him mix paints, whereupon he teaches her his theories about colouration, light and optics. Little by little, he takes her into his private world of beauty — a sanctuary which, as far as we know in the film, no one else is allowed to enter.
The main crisis in the story hinges on a key painting in Vermeer’s oeuvre. His patron Mr. Van Ruijven, whose taste in art is pedestrian, does not meddle with Vermeer’s choices for subjects. The patron seems content with whatever Vermeer paints. Thus Vermeer opts to do something bold and different. He usually paints people in workaday situations. He also paints landscapes. Portraiture is not his usual metier. Yet Griet has captivated him. Something inexpressible in her is what he longs to express.
The pearl belongs to his wife. He steals it from her vanity case. The portrait of Griet is incomplete without it. The beautiful jewel is needed to produce counterpoint: simple girl, elegant look. Her hair too is not right. Something must be done with it. In the end he decides to cover her long curls with a head scarf, which lends even more modesty to the face. The scarf also adds a touch of the exotic to her, as it almost resembles a turban — Turkish, Moroccan or Middle Eastern.
Catharina is hysterical when she discovers the purpose to which her missing earring has been put. Her tears are tears of rage, frustration, jealousy. Her husband’s talent has not raised the fortunes of the family. He has frittered it away on meaningless, unimportant subjects. None of his paintings has historical weight, allegorical significance. Now this, the final insult — a serving girl hopped up as cover girl with a pearl stolen from her own jewel case by her disreputable, philandering husband. Her tantrum scene in the film is almost unbearable to watch. We watch a woman losing her mind. She even tries to destroy the painting. Imagine that!
It’s all a clever fiction, but in the end you don’t notice it. For two hours you develop a Vermeer eye for splendid detail: the folds of a gown, the way sunlight streams through the kitchen window onto a bowl of apples or peaches, the look of colours diluted in glass jars filled with water or turpentine, the look in the painter’s eye as he sizes up and hunts down beauty, and Griet herself in her garments of modest simplicity which match the serene beauty of her pure and honest face.
It’s a pleasure to be surrounded by this sensuality, to be let into Vermeer’s world for these momentary glimpses of it. Tracy Chevalier is to be applauded for her imagination, and by turns Peter Webber and Eduardo Serra for their sensitive appreciation of Vermeer’s love of beauty.
It seems such a simple idea to take a beautiful painting and imagine the story behind it, and this was done exquisitely. Every scene could have been a Vermeer painting; the lighting, the poses, the costumes, the muted pallette with splashes of bright yellow and blue were all visually stunning. There wasn't much dialgoue; thoughts and feelings conveyed with looks, gestures and actions which I felt had much more impact.
Colin Firth was solid as Vermeer; constrained by the need to make money from his work to support his huge family, although in reality I think he produced very few paintings in his whole life. Scarlett Johansson was excellent as the terribly young, nervous, naive maid and subject of the work. The scene where she turns her head after she puts the earring on and we see, for the first time, the image of the painting was breathtaking.
A really wonderful film, totally absorbing and visually exquisite. Showing the real painting at the end - quite emotional and utterly beautiful.
Delivery was very satisfactory and the packaging was reasonably. :) :) :)