- Paperback: 576 pages
- Publisher: Penguin USA; Reprint edition (13 Jan. 2014)
- Language: English
- ISBN-10: 0143124099
- ISBN-13: 978-0143124092
- Product Dimensions: 13.9 x 3.1 x 21.4 cm
- Average Customer Review: 3.9 out of 5 stars See all reviews (7 customer reviews)
- Amazon Bestsellers Rank: 145,642 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
The Generals: American Military Command from World War II to Today Paperback – 13 Jan 2014
- Choose from over 13,000 locations across the UK
- Prime members get unlimited deliveries at no additional cost
- Find your preferred location and add it to your address book
- Dispatch to this address when you check out
Frequently Bought Together
Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
A "Washington Post" 2012 Notable Work of Nonfiction
"Ricks shines, blending an impressive level of research with expert storytelling."
" The Weekly Standard"
"[A] savvy study of leadership. Combining lucid historical analysis, acid-etched portraits of generals from 'troublesome blowhard' Douglas MacArthur to 'two-time loser' Tommy Franks, and shrewd postmortems of military failures and pointless slaughters such as My Lai, the author demonstrates how everything from strategic doctrine to personnel policies create a mediocre, rigid, morally derelict army leadership... Ricks presents an incisive, hard-hitting corrective to unthinking veneration of American military prowess."
"Publisher's Weekly "(Starred Review)
"Informed readers, especially military buffs, will appreciate this provocative, blistering critique of a system where accountability appears to have gone missing - like the author's 2006 bestseller, "Fiasco," this book is bound to cause heartburn in the Pentagon."
"Entertaining, provocative and important."
" The Wilson Quarterly "
This is a brilliant book deeply researched, very well-written and outspoken. Ricks pulls no punches in naming names as he cites serious failures of leadership, even as we were winning World War II, and failures that led to serious problems in later wars. And he calls for rethinking the concept of generalship in the Army of the future.
William J. Perry, 19th U.S. Secretary of Defense
Thomas E. Ricks has written a definitive and comprehensive story of American generalship from the battlefields of World War II to the recent war in Iraq. "The Generals" candidly reveals their triumphs and failures, and offers a prognosis of what can be done to ensure success by our future leaders in the volatile world of the twenty-first century.
Carlo D Este, author of "Patton: A Genius for War"
Tom Ricks has written another provocative and superbly researched book that addresses a critical issue, generalship. After each period of conflict in our history, the quality and performance of our senior military leaders comes under serious scrutiny. "The Generals" will be a definitive and controversial work that will spark the debate, once again, regarding how we make and choose our top military leaders.
Anthony C. Zinni, General USMC (Ret.)
"The Generals" is insightful, well written and thought-provoking. Using General George C. Marshall as the gold standard, it is replete with examples of good and bad generalship in the postwar years. Too often a bureaucratic culture in those years failed to connect performance with consequences. This gave rise to many mediocre and poor senior leaders. Seldom have any of them ever been held accountable for their failures. This book justifiably calls for a return to the strict, demanding and successful Marshall prescription for generalship. It is a reminder that the lives of soldiers are more important than the careers of officers and that winning wars is more important than either.
Bernard E. Trainor, Lt. Gen. USMC (Ret.); author of "The Generals War"
"The Generals" rips up the definition of professionalism in which the US Army has clothed itself. Tom Ricks shows that it has lost the habit of sacking those who cannot meet the challenge of war, leaving it to Presidents to do so. His devastating analysis explains much that is wrong in US civil-military relations. America s allies, who have looked to emulate too slavishly the world s pre-eminent military power, should also take heed.
Hew Strachan, Chichele Professor of the History of War, University of Oxford
About the Author
Thomas E. Ricks is the author of "Fiasco" and "The Gamble," both "New York Times" bestsellers. As a journalist, he was a member of two Pulitzer Prize-winning teams. He lives in Washington, D.C.
What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?
Top Customer Reviews
In this new and very contentious book Ricks argues that US post 1945 generalship has been very substandard for over 60 years. He castigates:MacArthur, Patton, Maxwell Taylor, Westmoreland, Colin Powell, Myers, Pace,the list is endless.Only Petraeus escapes criticism and now he has let the side down on the extra-marital front. In fact,the achievements of this officer in Iraq and Afghanistan have been somewhat exaggerated. The famous 'surge' has not been quite the success that Washington has claimed, and in any case many officers in addition to Petraeus (a very good PR man)were involved in the surge strategy.
If there was no First Amendment I suspect that a number of generals including Franks and Sanchez might be actively considering libel actions against Ricks, and I believe they would be justified. Given the list of incompetents it is amazing that America wasn't defeated in every war, save Vietnam.
It is very easy for armchair generals who have never heard a shot fired in anger to criticise the military. Of course, some are incompetent. I served under one or two as a colonel in the British army.Read more ›
The basic argument -- and it's certainly a controversial one -- is that the ability of top commanders in the US Army has been on the decline ever since the conclusion of World War II. Ricks paints this as a problem of several origins -- first and foremost, the military's lack of accountability for top level officers. In World War I and World War II, ineffective combat commanders were often "relieved" (i.e. fired) from their positions and reassigned to other duties (or asked to retire). Hand in hand with that, they were constantly evaluated for their fitness to command, all of which was overseen by the book's clear lost-to-history hero, George Marshall (he of the Marshall Plan).
With Marshall's retirement and death, everything started to come undone. In Korea and Vietnam you had commanders who weren't tactically or politically savvy. You had personnel policies that created bands of misfits, and you had an Army that rewarded careerism rather than performance, and one where the tool of relief became less and less frequently employed, no matter how egregious the failure of leadership. It is one of these breakdowns that was the biggest surprise for me. I knew of the My Lai massacre, or thought I did. It turns out the scale of the murders was much larger than I had believed and that there were all manner of other atrocities committed.Read more ›
It is not a book I think will add to any military library, probably after this new Fiasco is better that mr Ricks returns to write pulp novels and leave history to professionals.
Most Recent Customer Reviews
A well researched analysis of military failure, the lives of the soldiers becoming less important than officers careers is deeply troubling.Published 6 months ago by Campbell M
This should be read by every serious student of military history. Well written and easy to follow. Need I say more?Published 17 months ago by Glyn Luff