Fear of Music: Why People Get Rothko But Don't Get Stockhausen (Zero Books) Paperback – 24 Apr 2009
- Choose from over 13,000 locations across the UK
- Prime members get unlimited deliveries at no additional cost
- Find your preferred location and add it to your address book
- Dispatch to this address when you check out
Frequently Bought Together
Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought
Enter your mobile number below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Getting the download link through email is temporarily not available. Please check back later.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
About the Author
David Stubbs is a freelance British music journalist and author. Between 2004 and 2006 he was reviews editor for The Wire, the UK based magazine dedicated to avant garde and experimental music of all genres. Between 1987 and 1988 he was staff writer at Melody Maker, before going on to join the staff of the NME. As well as music, he also covers sport, film, literature and TV - his work regularly appears in The Guardian, Arena, The Wire, Uncut and When Saturday Comes.
What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?
Top Customer Reviews
"Zer0 is committed to the idea of publishing as a making public of the intellectual. It is convinced that in the unthinking, blandly consensual culture in which we live, critical and engaged theoretical reflection is more important than ever before."
Subsequently several things immediately grab me about this book but it's difficult to know whether they are faults or not, so I'll just report them and you can decide if it sounds like your kind of thing.
Firstly, there are several irritating editorial mistakes which leave you wondering if the proofreader read it very carefully at all. It doesn't get in the way of the arguments, but it is irritating.
Secondly despite quoting from many books and summarizing others, there is neither a bibliography, nor a list of references anywhere in the book. Presumably putting a bibliography in the back of the book would have been far too blandly consentual for Zero Book's switched on readers.
Thirdly, and more importantly, this book is very interesting in its description of the thread of music that it follows through the 20th Century, but it does seem to be quite a personal journey taken by Stubbs. He leaps from Schoenberg to Stockhausen, from the Futurists to the Musique Concret-ists, then suddenly hits what appears to be his favourite subject, free improvisation and obscure arthouse bands from the 70s and 80s. I didn't know a lot about these artists, so it was an interesting read, as were Stubbs' conclusions about them, but it doesn't take into account the majority of 20th Century music. At one point he mentions Wire magazine and you get the feeling that much of his musical tastes have been lead by that publication.Read more ›
So you'd expect that most of the book would be concerned with that question.
Of the seven chapters, the first explores the question interestingly. For example, people pay huge sums for paintings and sculptures, and millions of people have flocked to the Tate Modern art gallery, but these same people recoil in horror when they hear non-commercial music - whether you want to call it "art music" or "contemporary music" or "experimental music" or whatever.
The seventh chapter looks for an answer to the question. (Ideas considered include: the cachet of owning a unique original; the consequent possibility of financial gain; the ease with which one can walk away from a painting after a few seconds; people's willingness to "put up with far more crap visually"; corporations' desire to sanitise their image by owning visual art; etc.)
But the bulk of the book, the middle five chapters, are basically the author's views on various artists and (mostly pop) musicians of the last 50 years. He likes Sun Ra and Jimi Hendrix and post-punk, and dislikes the Beatles and Damien Hirst and Tracy Emin ... but what does this have to do with the book's title and subtitle? Nothing. The author is simply telling us what he likes and dislikes, and trying to pass it off as a history lesson, just like several other authors of bad books about music recently.
Great title and subtitle. Shame about the contents.
The basic question in the book's subtitle is rarely addressed specifically, and the answer isn't that clear. Stubbs cites the massive popularity of the Tate Modern in contrast to a lack of a comparative equivalent in music. Well, yes, the Tate Modern does have a lot of visitors. But still, the vast majority of Britain's populace never step foot inside it? However, modern art is more ubiquitous than it's equivalent music. For example, Rothko calenders appear in card shops, but you're not likely to hear Stockhausen on their stereo.
Personally, I think the answer is to do with the senses. Seeing for example, Dali's 'Autumnal Cannibalism' or Botticelli's 'Venus' or (to keep with the book, some of Rothko's work) in the flesh is quite an experience. But on the whole, when you view visual art, you do so at your own will, and for as long or as little as you like. If you find something dull or disturbing, you can shut your eyes, look away, and move on to the next piece.Read more ›
Most Recent Customer Reviews
Great book but very poorly edited - typos aplenty. Still recommended.Published 20 months ago by Maria Perevedentseva
I was unsure who this book was aimed at, even at the end of it. I would imagine that those most likely to be reading Stubbs' book are, like myself, already familiar with the music... Read morePublished on 19 Jan. 2014 by morelikespace
I share others' disappointment with this. As they've said, the introduction poses an interesting topic (the one in the book's subtitle) and the last thirty-odd pages begin to... Read morePublished on 2 April 2013 by Baldassaro
The question why a public that seems happy to embrace "modern" or "challenging" art is very reluctant to devote attention to "modern" or "challenging" music is a good one and... Read morePublished on 15 April 2012 by Beowulf "Wulfie" Mayfield
`Fear of Music' made me splutter cartoon bubbles at David Stubbs: "What the!.. Why you!.." It begins with the sub-title "Why People Get Rothko But Don't Get Stockhausen. Read morePublished on 3 Oct. 2011 by John Carter
Just re-read this, and I'm surprised to see the negative comments below, most of which are of the "But it's not a completely different book!" variety. Read morePublished on 3 Sept. 2011 by Geoff
Anyone who is involved in the art of noise, no matter which genre they inhabit, will no doubt have wrestled with the theme of Stubbs' book: why so many people declare a love for... Read morePublished on 31 Mar. 2011 by this little pig
Other reviewers have quite rightly criticized the proof reading and typesetting; they are abysmal. The standard of grammar is poor too, which is harder to blame on anyone but the... Read morePublished on 21 Nov. 2010 by Peter Green
I had real hopes for this book. However, it has signally failed to answer the very interesting question it has posed. Read morePublished on 18 Aug. 2010 by G. McBeath