Buy Used
+ £2.80 UK delivery
Used: Good | Details
Sold by anybookltd
Condition: Used: Good
Comment: This is an ex-library book and may have the usual library/used-book markings inside.This book has soft covers. In good all round condition. Please note the Image in this listing is a stock photo and may not match the covers of the actual item.
Have one to sell?
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

Engineering Mathematics: A Modern Foundation for Electronic, Electrical and Control Engineers Paperback – 4 May 1992

3.0 out of 5 stars 1 customer review

See all formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price
New from Used from
"Please retry"
£120.99 £0.01
click to open popover

Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.

  • Apple
  • Android
  • Windows Phone

To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.

Product details

  • Paperback: 672 pages
  • Publisher: Addison Wesley; 1 edition (4 May 1992)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0201175576
  • ISBN-13: 978-0201175578
  • Product Dimensions: 4.4 x 17.8 x 24.1 cm
  • Average Customer Review: 3.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (1 customer review)
  • Amazon Bestsellers Rank: 686,472 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?

Customer Reviews

3.0 out of 5 stars
5 star
4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star
See the customer review
Share your thoughts with other customers

Top Customer Reviews

Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
Bought this to help me through my first year of engineering at uni. Standard textbook really, nothing that exciting but had everything I needed and was a decent enough help and gave me more problems to practise with.
Comment One person found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse