Top critical review
2 people found this helpful
Good, but video quality is not the best...
on 1 February 2012
Software is good, especially the click analysis and timeline after a test. Shows how ridiculous the UK hazard perception test is - if you are *too* reactive, you fail! Fantastic.
Anyway, what lets this down is the poor video quality. When you are straining to look for hazards in the distance and just see some moving pixels it gets frustrating. Videos are nowhere near HD and distant objects are fuzzy and hard to make out. Like when watching non-HD football and looking at the crowd. I'm hoping the actual videos in the test will be higher quality!!