Have one to sell?
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more

Divine Nature and Human Language: Essays in Philosophical Theology Paperback – 22 Aug 1989

3.7 out of 5 stars
5 star
4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star
3.7 out of 5 stars 3 reviews from Amazon.com |

See all 2 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price
New from Used from
"Please retry"
"Please retry"
£120.29 £50.94
click to open popover

Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.

  • Apple
  • Android
  • Windows Phone

To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.

Product details

Customer Reviews

There are no customer reviews yet on Amazon.co.uk.
5 star
4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star

Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta)

Amazon.com: 3.7 out of 5 stars 3 reviews
6 of 6 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Excellent study in Philosophy of Religion 20 Oct. 2010
By J.W. Wartick - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
I continually ran into William Alston being discussed throughout the philosophy of religion books I read. I never knew why he was such a big deal until I picked up this work. In "Divine Nature and Human Language," Alston presents a cohesive flow of essays which argue that talk about God can indeed have a valid reference. Those theologians who deny that talk about God can mean anything often raise the objections Alston answers in this work.

The book's essays cover: I. 'Talk about God' which includes essays on "Irreducible Metaphors in Theology", "Can We Speak Literally of God?", "Functionalism and Theological Language", "Divine and Human Action", and "Referring to God" II. 'The Nature of God' with essays on "Hartshorne and Aquinas: A Via Media" (this essay is much-discussed throughout philosophy of religion), "Divine-Human Dialogue and the Nature of God", "Divine Foreknowledge and Alternative Conceptions of Human Freedom", "Does God have Beliefs?", III. 'God and the World' with essays on "God's Action in the World", "The Indwelling of the Holy Spirit," and "Some suggestions for Divine Command Theorists."

All of these essays are absolutely essential reading for philosophers of religion. Each addresses a topic that is of great interest to those interested in this field. Some of the essays have been discussed in other literature and rejected (Alston's formulation of a timeless God is interesting, but William Lane Craig rejects it in "Time and Eternity"--this debate over timelessness continues in Brian Leftow's "Time and Eternity", another fantastic work). Others have been discussed and affirmed.

I highly recommend this work for those who want to explore whether talk about God can mean anything. Moreover, it is necessary reading for those wishing to work in the field of philosophy of religion.
11 of 11 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars An Extraordinary Collection! 6 Jun. 2000
By A 14 year old David Ganssle - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Paperback
William Alston's collection of essays is truly extraordinary. This collection contains significant contributions in both the philosophy of religious language and in explorations of the nature of God. Especially important are the essays "Hartshorne and Aquinas: A via media" in which Alston carefully carves a path between the classical view of God and the process view showing that one does not need to accept either package as a whole and "Does God have beliefs?" in which he lays out a different approach to understanding God's knowledge.
It will be difficult to find one volume of essays that have made a greater contributions to philosophical theology than this one.
4 of 33 people found the following review helpful
1.0 out of 5 stars Confusion Abounding 9 July 1999
By Agate Lamp - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Paperback
Alston's study of theology and language is an admiraable attempt to deal with a worthy topic. Unfortunately, that's where this book's only star is gained. Alston tends to chase himself around, over, and through his topics, leaving the reader with no line of thought that can be consistently followed. He fails to connect his theology to his philosophy of language. His philosophy of language fails to agree with or elucidate either common sense notions of language or linguistic findings, and his theology is nothing remarkable. Thus, this book fails on both fronts it attempts to address.
Were these reviews helpful? Let us know