Buy Used
FREE Delivery on orders over £10.
Condition: Used: Good
Comment: This book is eligible for free delivery anywhere in the UK. Your order will be picked, packed and dispatched by Amazon. Buy with confidence!
Have one to sell?
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See all 2 images

Disordered Minds Paperback – 2 May 2008

3.3 out of 5 stars 35 customer reviews

See all formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price
New from Used from
Kindle Edition
"Please retry"
Paperback, 2 May 2008
£0.01 £0.01
click to open popover

Special Offers and Product Promotions

Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.

  • Apple
  • Android
  • Windows Phone

To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.

Product details

  • Paperback: 608 pages
  • Publisher: Pan; New edition edition (2 May 2008)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 033042002X
  • ISBN-13: 978-0330420020
  • Product Dimensions: 11.1 x 3.5 x 17.8 cm
  • Average Customer Review: 3.3 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (35 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Bestsellers Rank: 1,038,485 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Product Description

Amazon Review

Slowly but surely, Minette Walters has been building up her reputation as one of the UK's most penetrating and distinctive purveyors of the psychological thriller. Disordered Minds will add even more lustre to her name. Such books as Fox Evil and Acid Row demonstrated Walters' reluctance to repeat herself in terms of narrative, and her easy command of the various social groups in her novels (upper middle or council estate) is more sure than that of her colleagues and peers.

Disordered Minds builds on her rich mélange of gifts and continues to strip-mine darker areas of the human psyche than most contemporary novelists--literary or otherwise--are keen to tackle. It's the 1970s: a man dies in prison after a controversial conviction for killing his grandmother. Howard Stamp, an educationally subnormal young man, takes his own life, and the case generates movements claiming Stamp's innocence. Anthropologist Jonathan Hughes digs deeper than the police had originally done, and when Jonathan's path crosses that of the elderly George Gardener, long an advocate of the hapless Stamp's innocence, Gardener co-opts Jonathan in an attempt to clear the dead man's name. But there are some frightening consequences, such as the fact that the real killer will not like being put in the frame again.

As always, Walters is interested in far more than the simple mechanics of crime-novel plotting: Despite their differences, Jonathan Hughes finds that the backward Stamp is still something of a doppelganger of himself, mirroring his own disturbed childhood and sense of alienation, while the background of a pending conflict in Iraq throws the personal dramas sharply into relief. This is Walters at her disturbing best. --Barry Forshaw -- Dieser Text bezieht sich auf eine vergriffene oder nicht verfügbare Ausgabe dieses Titels.

Book Description

A dark, gripping tale of solitude and evil -- Dieser Text bezieht sich auf eine vergriffene oder nicht verfügbare Ausgabe dieses Titels.

See all Product Description

What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?

Customer Reviews

Top Customer Reviews

Format: Hardcover
I've always been a die hard Minette Walters fan and pre order her latest book as soon as it becomes available. Everything she has written so far has been pitch perfect. The endings are always unexpected and you are eagerly turning the pages until the very last paragraph. This book, however, was a bit of a disappointment. On the whole, it is classic Walters, and you will be hooked to the bitter end. However, when you reach the last page, you will probably find yourself wondering if somebody has ripped out the final chapter. Unlike her other novels, however, this one fizzles out limply without any satisfying conclusion. Although it's another morality tale, this moral is hardly ground breaking stuff (we all have a bit of good and a bit of evil in us - tell us something we DON'T know!) And I have to say that Walters' insistence on using the term "quid pro quo" every chapter in every book is wearing a bit thin - as is her obsession with child abuse (can we have a book about something else?) I hope the next book features a change of subject, and also a change of characters. Walters seems to have fallen into the trap of basing all her characters on the same person, but with different names and job titles. Even the apparently illiterate, violent, abused louts in the novel come out with deep philosophical insights they would never have in a million years - as someone who has relatives like this I can assure you that meaningful introspection doesn't feature heavily in their lives! I'd like to see Walters next book being a bit more gritty and realistic, as her attitude to the "abused", "poor" and "downtrodden" is horribly patronising. She writes from the viewpoint of a smug woolly liberal who's never lived among the people she writes about in a million years.Read more ›
Comment 27 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Format: Hardcover
Having just read through the other online reviews of 'Disordered Minds,' I'm left with a feeling that this latest effort from Minette Walters has split her loyal readership into two camps. Half seem to think it's Walters at her best, half think she's lost her way. I have to admit, sadly I fall into the latter camp.
I did enjoy the book and I did pursue it to the end and, certainly, I will eagerly await any future offerings from Ms Walters. However, I believe this was a flawed novel and perhaps not one which would make a new reader to Walters want to pursue any of her past fantastic offerings, such as The Shape of Snakes, The Sculptress, Acid Row etc... etc...
So what was the problem? I think it's twofold. Firstly, the character of Dr Hughes, who initially poses the idea that Howard Stamp was wrongly convicted of his grandmother's murder in 1970, seems to become far too great a focus in the early part of the book. Following this initial over-emphasis which takes the reader far too far away from the actual plotline, without adding sufficiently to it, Hughes is then suddenly sidelined in favour of telling the story from other viewpoints. It further emasculates an already self-emasculating character and makes his very presence rather irritating. (And personally, I do hate it when authors introduce a new character at the 11th hour because they can't think of any other way to tie up loose ends: the arrival of private detective Sasha Spencer is just too convenient a tool for my taste!)
Secondly, whilst I normally love the way Walters makes her readers weave through an intensely complex plot, I think this one went too far. Lies are told to cover up injustices.
Read more ›
1 Comment 14 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Format: Hardcover
I am a huge fan of Minette Walters since reading “The Shape of Snakes” a few years ago. I have enjoyed every book, but I found that “Disordered Minds” was pretty disappointing in comparison to the others.
The dimension that the author usually puts around the characters seems to be lacking from this one, making it hard to become involved with the story and to get involved with the characters.
I am sad to say that although a big (in past) fan of Walter’s, my only sense of urgency in finishing this book was so that I could move swiftly onto something else.
Comment 13 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Format: Paperback
I started reading this novel in the hairdresser's. By the time I left I'd covered the first two sections: the 1970s gang rape and the 2003 description of a murder that (coincidentally? or maybe not?) took place a few weeks later, along with the suggestion that the police got the wrong man. (For the murder, that is. As far as the rape was concerned the police didn't get any man at all.) I was gripped.

Unfortunately, the rest of the book fails to live up to its early promise. Yes, it's fairly enjoyable. I had no trouble turning the pages. But it meanders. Waffles, even. There is very little suspense. The central premise is the connection (if any) between the rape and the murder. (Dr Hughes - psychologist, reluctant detective, and a bit of a nutter - tells George, his co-detective, that he has trouble with coincidences.) The same bunch of unsavouries appears in the vicinity of both crimes. And then pops up again, immediately, never mind that over thirty years has passed, when Hughes and George start to investigate. It doesn't take them (or us) long to work out who is really responsible for these crimes. Yet the book is long.

Another problem is that the characters clunk. The workings show. George and Hughes get off to a disasterous start, but hours later they are best of buddies. George and Roy (the nasty minded landlord of George's local) are mates. And then, quite suddenly, they are (literally) at each other's throats. This happens again and again with various relationships throughout the book.

We know what the book's about. It's about not judging by appearances or jumping to conclusions. That's what everyone did back in 1970.
Read more ›
Comment 5 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse

Most Recent Customer Reviews