Have one to sell?
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

The Crash Controversy: Censorship Campaigns and Film Reception Hardcover – 11 Dec 2001

5 out of 5 stars 1 customer review

See all formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price
New from Used from
Hardcover
"Please retry"
ÂŁ286.05 ÂŁ56.27

Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.

  • Apple
  • Android
  • Windows Phone

To get the free app, enter your e-mail address or mobile phone number.




Product details

  • Hardcover: 212 pages
  • Publisher: Wallflower Press (11 Dec. 2001)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 1903364175
  • ISBN-13: 978-1903364178
  • Product Dimensions: 24.2 x 15.7 x 1.9 cm
  • Average Customer Review: 5.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (1 customer review)
  • Amazon Bestsellers Rank: 6,429,114 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Product Description

Review

an engaging read for anyone interested in contemporary media culture -- Lee Grieveson, King’s College London


Customer Reviews

5.0 out of 5 stars
5 star
1
4 star
0
3 star
0
2 star
0
1 star
0
See the customer review
Share your thoughts with other customers

Top Customer Reviews

By A Customer on 19 Jan. 2003
Format: Paperback
As well as finding this book very interesting and helpful in relation to the discussions surrounding 'Crash', I also enjoyed it. I had read 'Ill Effects' and 'The Video Nasties', both written/edited by Martin Barker (the author of this book), and found them interesting. I think that if anyone is interested in censorship, particularly the 'Crash' controversy, then this book is the ideal. It has been published recently so there is a lot of up-to-date information on this subject.
Comment 5 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse


Feedback