The Civil War of 1812: American Citizens, British Subjects, Irish Rebels, & Indian Allies Hardcover – 12 Oct 2010
- Choose from over 13,000 locations across the UK
- Prime members get unlimited deliveries at no additional cost
- Find your preferred location and add it to your address book
- Dispatch to this address when you check out
This Book Is Bound with "Deckle Edge" Paper
You may have noticed that some of our books are identified as "deckle edge" in the title. Deckle edge books are bound with pages that are made to resemble handmade paper by applying a frayed texture to the edges. Deckle edge is an ornamental feature designed to set certain titles apart from books with machine-cut pages. See a larger image.
Customers Who Viewed This Item Also Viewed
Enter your mobile number below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Getting the download link through email is temporarily not available. Please check back later.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
"Remarkable and deeply researched. . . . Taylor masterfully captures the strangeness of this war."
--Gordon S. Wood, "The New York Review of Books"
"Easily the most sophisticated book ever written about a conflict that is often either neglected or seriously misunderstood. . . . Taylor's discussions of diplomatic and political maneuvering are woven with military set-pieces into a powerful narrative. . . . [This] book affirms his gifts for prodigious research."
--"The Wall Street Journal"
"Credit Taylor with blowing most of the dust off America's most forgotten war. This is history with a capital H."
--"The Seattle Times"
"A truly spellbinding narrative. Unlike other books on the War of 1812, [Taylor's] is about the hearts and minds of the people who planned it, fought it and lived through it. Almost every page brings a revelation."
--"The Toronto Star"
"In this deeply researched and clearly written book, [Taylor] tells the riveting story of a war that redefined North America."
--"The Washington Times"
"Comprehensive. . . . Taylor's account of a land war that roughly divided people with a common culture and heritage provides a new dimension for an understanding of 1812."
--"The Boston Globe"
"An impressively accessible history. . . . A perceptively nuanced take on a war often forgotten or misunderstood. . . . Taylor offers persuasive arguments, a lively narrative."
--"Richmond Times Dispatch"
"Taylor gives a fascinating account of the war and shows its importance to the fragile new republic in a book filled with stories about the people who instigated, commanded and fought in the conflict."
--The Associated Press
"Taylor serves up a corrective in [this] fact-laden account. . . . Nicely captures the confusion of a 'minor' war with major consequences."
---"The Newark Star-Ledger"
"Taylor's beautifully written book offers a War of 1812 that's no longer an insignificant afterth
Remarkable and deeply researched. . . . Taylor masterfully captures the strangeness of this war.
Gordon S. Wood, "The New York Review of Books"
Easily the most sophisticated book ever written about a conflict that is often either neglected or seriously misunderstood. . . . Taylor s discussions of diplomatic and political maneuvering are woven with military set-pieces into a powerful narrative. . . . [This] book affirms his gifts for prodigious research.
"The Wall Street Journal"
Credit Taylor with blowing most of the dust off America s most forgotten war. This is history with a capital H.
"The Seattle Times"
A truly spellbinding narrative. Unlike other books on the War of 1812, [Taylor s] is about the hearts and minds of the people who planned it, fought it and lived through it. Almost every page brings a revelation.
"The Toronto Star"
In this deeply researched and clearly written book, [Taylor] tells the riveting story of a war that redefined North America.
"The Washington Times"
Comprehensive. . . . Taylor s account of a land war that roughly divided people with a common culture and heritage provides a new dimension for an understanding of 1812.
"The Boston Globe"
An impressively accessible history. . . . A perceptively nuanced take on a war often forgotten or misunderstood. . . . Taylor offers persuasive arguments, a lively narrative.
"Richmond Times Dispatch"
Taylor gives a fascinating account of the war and shows its importance to the fragile new republic in a book filled with stories about the people who instigated, commanded and fought in the conflict.
The Associated Press
Taylor serves up a corrective in [this] fact-laden account. . . . Nicely captures the confusion of a minor war with major consequences.
"The Newark Star-Ledger"
Taylor s beautifully written book offers a War of 1812 that s no longer an insignificant afterthought to the American Revolution, but its final, decisive act.
As is his talented wont, Taylor puts the war into perspective, positing that it redefined the North American continent.
"Asbury Park Press "(New Jersey)
Thoroughly researched. . . . Taylor illuminates an arena generally omitted from military histories of the war. Battles and campaigns do connect his account, however, which will stand history collections in good stead for a very long while.
"Booklist"" --This text refers to the Paperback edition.
About the Author
Born and raised in Maine, Alan Taylor teaches American and Canadian history at the University of California, Davis. His books include "The Divided Ground, " "Writing Early American History, " "American Colonies, " and "William Cooper s Town, " which won the Bancroft and Pulitzer prizes for American history. He also serves as a contributing editor to "The New Republic."" --This text refers to the Paperback edition.
What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?
Top Customer Reviews
Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta)
Taylor's turn of phrasing and his writing style is marvelous, it is almost a forgotten art. He does build blocks of understanding, giving the background of social-political feelings pre 1812, explaining the feelings that were remnants of the revolution of 1776. He does well, also in presenting the Canadian view of the barbarous actions of some of the US patriots. International events that always add to the avalanche of wars, the French Revolution and British seizures of merchant ships and impressments of sailors are well described.
Part of the reasons for calling this a civil war were the elements of former Irish citizens fighting and the conflict of Anglican versus Catholic faith. The factor of the absolute terror of Americans of the `savage' Indians also is dealt with and its consequence on warfare.
There are maps and illustrations interspersed in the readings, which is much more helpful than just a section put in a group.
Alan Taylor is successful in proving his postulation that this was a civil war between what had been immigrants to the North American continent finally creating Canadians and Americans. I do wish his title would have been more explanatory that this was not a civil war between former British citizens - and therefore a broader view of the War of 1812; but instead a more focused examination into a part of the War of 1812. It is still a remarkable history of a Canadian/US war.
In the years before the War of 1812, British policy in Canada encouraged American migration to its underpopulated provinces, as Britain actively sought to create an alternate vision of North America that would appeal to residents in what many thought would be a short lived republican expermiment in the United States. Britain offered free land to American settlers of Upper Canada, but offered a more restricted press and more tightly controlled government. When war came, many of the newest settlers actively rebelled against the British government, contrary to later popular Canadian myth. The United States eventually cold-heartedly sacrificed these rebels to their fate.
The United States had many problems including severe internal political divisions between Federalists and Republicans that prevented the republic from fighting an effective war against the British. The author presents lots of evidence of local Federalist betrayal of the war effort and slip shod management by the governing Republicans. It has always been a mystery to me why the United States strategic direction of the war was so flawed - repeatedly, the Americans attacked western Upper Canada and seemed fixated on the Niagara region which was of little strategic value compared to the St. Lawerence River valley. The author shows how political considerations dictated the strategy of the war.
The book includes information on several other internal conflicts in the border region. Britain, Canada and the United States each have both their bright and shameful moments in the tale. Many of these will surprise students of more general histories of this war. Native American policies are discussed at length, as are Irish immigration and the use of Irish soldiers on both sides, impressment, the causes and reaction to desertion by both sides, the treatement of prisoners and how that affected the war, hostages, relationships between civilians and the military, and the struggle over food supplies in the wilderness. The relation of each of these topics to the adoption of military strategies and tactics by both sides are described effectively.
The author makes a convincing case that this war was not the indecisive conflict it is usually portrayed as being. The war firmly established both the British Empire and the United States along firm boundaries along the Great Lakes, and destroyed the northwestern Native American tribes as a political force. It also firmly established republican ideals in both British Canada and the United States, although not in ways originally envisioned by either side.
The author writes in an entertaining style, and the book includes lots of period maps and illustrations. I highly recommend this book.
The author takes pains to develop the ethnic divisions between Canadians and Americans, or lack thereof, before and during the war. Surprisingly, the author identifies the immigrants from Ireland all as "Irish", mostly adherents to the "United Irishmen", calling them a "mixture of Protestants and Catholics." In actually, they were almost all Presbyterian Irish, more commonly called Scotch-Irish, of mixed Irish and Scot ancestry. He is correct in his depiction of many settlers having become somewhat disillusioned with the nascent United States government, being forced to pretty much provide for their own security against the Indians with the Whiskey Rebellion fresh in their minds. The group that had emigrated to Upper Canada was up for grabs in respect to their loyalty, but the American forces, particularly through their reliance on militia and with incompetent leadership, squandered their chances to bring Upper Canada into the United States. Of course, there was never any chance of gaining the loyalty of Catholic Lower Canada that was steeped in Civil Law and adherence to a crown.
For the American reader, this conflict takes on a dreary litany of defeats, mistakes, heavy casualties, much suffering, and woeful leadership. Seen from the Canadian side, however, it is not much better. Very fortunately for the US, Great Britain was more interested at the time in defeating Napoleon than in re-acquiring the US as a colony. New England considered secession and from New York eastwards, Americans were unreliable and even seditious.
All the opportunities, attitudes and failures on both sides are brought to light in a masterly account, even if it is not thrilling. The Canadian loyalists considered British rule as necessary to defend their property rights and maintain law and order. The Americans considered the Republican Government of the US as necessary to defend their property rights and maintain law and order. And both sides came from the same ethnic stock -- that of the Scotch-Irish. Both sides were suspicious of their governments and relatively unhappy with their situation. The situation was made for muddle and suffering, particularly on the American side that was essentially unprepared for war on any level, militarily, economically, financially, and politically.
In the end Upper Canada remained as a British Colony (to rebel unsuccessfully twenty years later) and the US remained sovereign. The main losers were the Indians whose power was broken, and who were abandoned by the British and no longer able to maintain their independence facing the pressure of American westward-moving settlers.
The only major discussion the author failed to fully develop, in spite of a yeoman attempt, was why the Scotch-Irish of Upper Canada, many of whom were recent immigrants from the US, ultimately chose mostly to remain loyal to England. This is a very complex question, since only thirty-five years before that same group had been the backbone of the American Continental Army. Some were repelled by American looting and poor treatment, some were skeptical of republicanism, some felt the English would protect them from the Indians, some were willing to trade freedom and voting rights for security. The author makes all these points, but somehow the discourse is unsatisfying. Oh, well, maybe in the next book.
All in all, this is a very fine work, and there is much to learn from its pages.
Highly recommended to all history students.
But the book has 2 major flaws which should have been seen by the editor and the outside readers. 1st--the book is not about thew war of 1812, at least not in theatres other than the Canadian/US border. Everywhere else seems to get short shrift, or totally ignored. For example, nowhere does the battle of Horseshoe Bend appear, and the Creeks get hardly a mention. He simply ignores the Creek War, the Chesapeake Bay campaigns of 1813-1814, etc. It is too narrow. Hickey is still the best overall study, to be sure. So, if you are interested in the Great Lakes region in the conflict, this book would be of interest.
Secondly, this conceptual framework of a "civil war" is weakly presented and supported. It only comes out occasionally, and then only as an afterthought. It is not a bad idea, and should have been teased out with much greater detail and emphasis, but for pages on end, Taylor loses track of this theme--or ignores it totally, as in the case of southern Indians. That is to say, if the main theme was to be about "civil wars" within a war, there's no better example than the divided Creeks in the south, but we hear nothing about that.
Unfort., of late I have had to start putting the following in all reviews: for those who do not agree with me on my review, be advised that you are entitled to your opinions--as am I. Just because you may not see the book in the same light as I do does not mean you are better, I am worse, or give you the right to make ad hominum attacks on me. The maturity level of many history reviewers on amazon.com is very low, particularly among those with little or no training in the field of history. Please act and write maturely, and as if you were face to face with me.
The author, an award-winning historian, restricts his talents, which are on full display in this rather prodigious research and analysis, to the peoples on both sides involved in the northern borderland squirmishes. And thus, although it is not a conventional chest-beating patriotic (America right or wrong) kind of history, it is still a fascinating and an interesting slice of the societies occupying the American and Canadian borderlands. In a way that is perhaps more suited for psychological or anthropological analyses, but that is certainly uncommon for history, this author in a very unobtrusive way, gets the reader inside the heads of the competing factions. (What a bonus for book already filled with enough excitement!)
His analysis is a fascinating way to parse history. It seems clear early on that whatever else was his aim, the author, in the end was trying to convey to the reader, the richness of the contrasts in the cultures (ways of thinking and "ways of living") of the societies on either side of the war. Thus another way to characterize his aim is to say that the real "tug-of-war" within this war, was not only metaphysical -- about which philosophy of government -democratic republicanism or the ancient regime - would prevail - but also about what kind of society the new nation would present to the rest of the world. There is both richness and pathos in his accounts on either side of the divide.
The way the author goes about his task keeps the reader maximally engaged, for it is almost as if the story was a novel populated with interesting and unpredictable characters. It does not focus solely on historical narrative of the war per se, nor only on the major events of the war as in classical history, but is divided chapter-wise by the categories of peoples (and their habits), occupying the borderlands, and by salient ideas of major interest to the author. This in the end proves to be a heady mixture and a rich mother lode of slices of history by races, characters, adventurers, charlatans, rogues and scoundrels. Along with the background themes of the war, the book is full of anecdotes, quotes and (did I already say) unusual characters. Altogether they all are befitting the strangeness of the war itself, which ended in a draw of little consequence, and with absolutely nothing being decided. How an Historian can make such an otherwise inconsequential war so interesting is a testament to the author's skills. This is certainly a rich tableau for the reader as well as a rich legacy for other historians. Five stars.