Learn more Shop now Learn more Shop now Shop now Shop now Shop now Shop now Shop now Learn More Shop now Shop now Learn more Shop Fire Shop Kindle Learn More Shop now Fitbit

There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.

on 31 October 2016
I found this disappointing. I was less prepared to believe in reincarnation after reading it than I was before. Only one chapter (Chapter 4) is devoted to describing actual cases of children who remember previous lives, though later chapters refer to particular features of other cases, where they are introduced ad hoc to bolster some point the author is making. Even the fourteen cases in Chapter 4 are just summaries, with the author saying these and most of the other cases he refers to are written up more fully in his other books and articles. The thing that struck me about the fourteen cases described here is how weak they are. The author collected his data often years after the events had occurred, by which time the children had frequently forgotten their memories of a previous life, and the author was reliant on interviews with others about what had happened. In some of the cases, a child remembered a previous life, but it was never confirmed that such a person had existed. For example, a Burmese girl remembered being a Japanese military cook who had been killed by allied bombing in WW2, but, although such an event may well have happened, no specific person was identified. In many of the other cases, the adults involved were strong believers in reincarnation or could draw comfort from projecting the idea onto their children...for example, a woman who believed that her son was the reincarnation of the love of her life who was killed before they could get married, or a father who believed that his twin girls were the reincarnation of their older sisters who had been killed in a car crash. In the latter case, the twins themselves did not believe they were reincarnated. Apart from this chapter on cases, the book begins with several chapters of general discussion, in which the author admonishes those who reject the idea of reincarnation out of hand and urges the reader to have an open mind. He covers other ways of getting information about reincarnation, such as through hypnotic regression, and then himself rejects them pretty much out of hand, saying the study of children who remember previous lives is the only reliable way. I began to wonder whether the author's "MD" is legit, as he seems to have some strange ideas, for example taking the existence of telepathy as a scientific fact. He uses the existence of telepathy to prove that the mind is distinct from the brain, and he says that, while some people might doubt telepathy, the evidence for it is so overwhelming it cannot realistically be denied. Well, I am all ready to believe in telepathy, but I hardly think it can be used as a solidly established fact on which to build other theorising. After the chapter on case studies, the author goes on to discuss various regularities of the cases, such as the tendency of the children to forget their memories after a certain age, and the high incidence of violent death among the previous personalities (as the author calls them). Since the author insists that reincarnation is real, he finds himself having to explain away what appears to be strong evidence that it is actually a social/cultural phenomenon rather than a natural/biological one. This evidence includes the fact that in cultures where there is a belief people cannot reincarnate as a member of the opposite sex, no such cases occur, and even though many westerners believe in reincarnation on a personal level, it is not socially recognised, and is seldom reported in the west. The author suggests this correspondence between cultural beliefs and what actually happens is because people suppress or overlook cases that do not fit their preconceptions. This could be the explanation, but it seems like special pleading, and is typical of much similar special pleading in the later chapters of the book—for example when he acknowledges that people might have defrauded him and responds by saying “I don’t think they did, though”. The final chapters consist of what appears to be data-free theorising about how reincarnation might work. For example, he worries about how souls (discarnate personalities) get into the right gender of embryo, suggesting, to me ludicrously, that “a discarnate personality might influence a potential mother telepathically and cause psychosomatic changes in her that would increase or decrease the chances of a male conceptus”. Well yes, it might. But does this get us anywhere? After ploughing through page after page of such speculation, I began to get a bit impatient. The reason I don’t give the book one star is, to his credit, that the author is very honest about the flaws in the data, and it could be said that he uses the book to show the problems of these cases as much as to argue for their veracity. His essential point is that, despite the weaknesses of any individual case, the total of several hundred cases he has investigated from many parts of the world, and their cross-cultural similarities, point to the existence of a genuine phenomenon. I think he is right. There is something here, but whether it is actual reincarnation or some kind of sociological oddity and human self-deception is uncertain. After reading this book, I moved closer to the latter point of view, but my mind remains open.
0Comment| 2 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 25 April 2017
timely, correct, with the needed message to enlighten me on the status of my order, great ...

0Comment|Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
Ian Stevenson's research is tantalisingly there, near a mystery that we can't pin down but is there. The phenomenon of children remembering from an early age, until, in later years, the world floods in and the child forgets is very similar to what happens when we try to recall deep dreams.

We've all had those deep dreams that bother us in the morning but we struggle to remember in the afternoon until the last trace vanishes.

I've had really profound philosophical dream scenario's that boggle me in the morning but in the afternoon I remember nothing. This is what Ian Stevenson says happens in cases of child remembrance. As they get older, the kids eventually forget and nothing of the previous life remains in memory. Stevenson writes that there has never been a case of a child taking the memory along into adulthood. They all eventually forget and its gone forever, like it was a dream. This is why I say it's profound because a charlatan will claim to still remember but the pattern is that they all forget and in different parts of india too.

Interestingly, around the time Stevenson says memory of the past life vanishes is the same time the innate language acquisition power switches off. All kids, up to the age of around 4, can learn any language anywhere. If a 3 year old from England moves to China, she will be fluent in Chinese within 6 months! This power vanishes around the age of 4. At the age of, say, 6, the child will find it impossible to pick another language.

Is there a link here somewhere? Are children more 'tuned in', as it where, to something that vanishes as we get older?

Anyway, the research of Ian Stevenson goes against the popular idea of hypnotic regression to Cleopatra or Napoleon. The idea that I have a dozens of lives swimming between my ears, and all I need is a guy to swing a chain in front of my nose is the kind of nonsense that turns people away from this subject!
0Comment| 2 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 14 September 2014
It is not for a beginner, you should have a knowledge and understanding of Reincarnation. Otherwise very informative.
0Comment| 2 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 30 April 2012
I found this book really interesting in that it provides a convincing account of past lives, and really made me believe that such a thing is possible. It's not exactly a page turner, as it writes a lot about methodology, but the cases of children who remember past lives are well worth it if you are interested in this subject.
See my blog post on the book for more info: [...]
0Comment| 4 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 11 October 2011
It is a very interesting book. It is written in such a fashion that when you doubt about reincarnation this doubt will be taken away.
0Comment| 4 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse