FREE Delivery in the UK.
Only 12 left in stock (more on the way).
Dispatched from and sold by Amazon. Gift-wrap available.
Quantity:1
Chambers Dictionary of Et... has been added to your Basket
+ £2.80 UK delivery
Used: Like New | Details
Sold by SNaylerBooks
Condition: Used: Like New
Comment: Orders shipped daily from the UK. Professional seller.
Have one to sell?
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See all 2 images

Chambers Dictionary of Etymology Hardcover – 6 Aug 1999

4.8 out of 5 stars 16 customer reviews

See all formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price
New from Used from
Hardcover
"Please retry"
£30.00
£25.31 £14.06
Note: This item is eligible for click and collect. Details
Pick up your parcel at a time and place that suits you.
  • Choose from over 13,000 locations across the UK
  • Prime members get unlimited deliveries at no additional cost
How to order to an Amazon Pickup Location?
  1. Find your preferred location and add it to your address book
  2. Dispatch to this address when you check out
Learn more
£30.00 FREE Delivery in the UK. Only 12 left in stock (more on the way). Dispatched from and sold by Amazon. Gift-wrap available.
click to open popover

Special Offers and Product Promotions


Frequently Bought Together

  • Chambers Dictionary of Etymology
  • +
  • The Etymologicon: A Circular Stroll Through the Hidden Connections of the English Language
Total price: £38.99
Buy the selected items together

Enter your mobile number below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Getting the download link through email is temporarily not available. Please check back later.

  • Apple
  • Android
  • Windows Phone

To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.




Product details

  • Hardcover: 1320 pages
  • Publisher: Chambers (6 Aug. 1999)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0550142304
  • ISBN-13: 978-0550142306
  • Product Dimensions: 17.8 x 5.7 x 25.4 cm
  • Average Customer Review: 4.8 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (16 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Bestsellers Rank: 173,465 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Product Description

Review

'The best of scholarship ... the most user-friendly of etymological dictionaries' (University of Georgia)

Book Description

The origins and development of over 30,000 English words

See all Product Description

Customer Reviews

4.8 out of 5 stars
5 star
13
4 star
3
3 star
0
2 star
0
1 star
0
See all 16 customer reviews
Share your thoughts with other customers

Top Customer Reviews

Format: Hardcover Verified Purchase
This is the first review I have written, but I felt it necessary to correct a false statement in another review, particuarly since 28 of 32 people found the review (which gave the book only 1 star) helpful. Specifically,
QUOTE A lot of the words don't go back to the real origin. "Street' for example is said to be derived from the Latin "Strata" or "paved road", when the Latin actually comes from the Semitic, "Serat" for "straight road".UNQUOTE
Semitic "Serat" (also Arabic "Sirat") comes from Latin (via Greek as an intermediary) not the other way around as asserted by the reviewer. There is simply no doubt about this. As pointed out in the Chambers Dictionary, "Strata" is the past participle of the Latin verb STERNERE ("to lay down", "to spread out") which shares a common INDO-EUROPEAN origin with the Germanic root which is the basis of English STREW. I have not seen ANY etymological dictionary that has a different explanation, and I have consulted authoritative ones in English, French, Spanish, Italian and German. In English, this origin is confirmed by, among others, (i) the Oxford English Dictionary, (ii) the American Heritage Dictionary of Indo-European Roots.
A second comment of the same reviewer was
QUOTE The dictionary also lists many languages that use a specific word without telling us about the source of the word, which is what etymology is about.UNQUOTE
In fact, my impression is that the Chambers Dictionary gives far more information than other comparable etymological dictionaries in terms of the ultimate roots of words. Taking a word at random, for "make", Old English macian is traced back through Old Saxon makon to Proto-Germanic *makojanan from the Indo-European root *mag-.
Read more ›
2 Comments 296 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Format: Hardcover
This is an excellent etymology dictionary. If I could sum it up with a single signifier, it would be CLEAR!

I compared this with the OED in-store and found that the clarity of entries - definition, history - in the Chambers by far exceeded that of its competitor - especially its minimal use of abbreviations (of which the OED was laden). Not only does the perspicuity of its entries place it above the OED, the Chambers' clear typeset, complimented by its leaf quality, elevated it even further over that of its ugly other, whose use of some obscenely obscure Romanesque font really didn't flatter its crude sheets of recycled Financial Times.

I would strongly advise this for those who are untrained in linguistics and/or philology. The OED retails at twice the price of Chambers, and from my perspective is 'clearly' inferior. This reference book will - for a long time to come - have its place by my bedside.

OED = Oxford Dictionary of English Etymology
1 Comment 84 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Format: Hardcover
This is an impecably researched book and makes fascinating reading. It explains how the words we use today originated and when.
My only criticism of the book is that it has adopted American spellings of words in certain cases, e.g. smolder, rather than smoulder.
But it is competatively priced against the other etymology dictionaries. So, you pays your money and you takes your choice.
1 Comment 78 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Format: Hardcover
This book is equally useful (and endlessly fascinating) to the serious researcher as to someone simply interested in words, where they originate from, and particularly to those who love the English language.
In way of entertainment it beats any TV programme currently running!
Comment 17 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Format: Hardcover
You'll either find etymology (the origin and evolution of words) pointless or endlessly fascinating. All words can't be interesting, of course, but a surprising number are - and not just the crowd-pleasers like tawdry, from St Audrey's [neck]lace. This book, despite its discernible American bias (it's really The Barnhart Dictionary of Etymology en travesti), is supreme in its field. Mine's the '88 edition (xxvii, 1284p); I doubt it's changed since. Despite curious omissions* it would ornament any library. Quicker and more reliable than the web, scholarly and endlessly entertaining - I wish I'd known about it years ago

* Solipsism, for instance, or the rarer bedizen, apparently cognate with distaff. It would be nice to have learned how Americans pronounced it. If they ever did. (Traditionally it rhymes with eyes-on.)

Postscript [after the 2014 referendum]
The other book you need by your elbow is Chambers Dictionary itself, for which no praise is too high, though again I'm comfortable with an older edition, the 1993, the one when they dropped the 'Twentieth Century' tag. Why doesn't the Chambers brothers' mini-empire receive a fraction of the interest lavished on Murray and his Oxford cohort? Could it possibly be because they're (fie! the very idea!) Scottish? (Hands off our tongue, man!) Of course Murray's a Scot too, but one of ours. Not that I'm advocating independence, now - at least not on economic grounds. But is the economy the only thing that counts? Bottom line, do you side with the coloniser or the colonised?
1 Comment 13 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Format: Hardcover Verified Purchase
I chose this book on etymology above the oxford edition purely on other reviews and am not sorry I did so. It is an excellent tome, a perfect partner for my chambers dictionary.
Comment 9 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse

Most Recent Customer Reviews



Feedback