The Black Legend of Prince Rupert's Dog: Witchcraft and Propaganda during the English Civil War Hardcover – 6 Jun 2011
Customers Who Viewed This Item Also Viewed
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
'A cross-over book, appealing as it should to those who are obsessed by witchcraft and those who are keen followers of civil war studies.' --Professor Martyn Bennett, Nottingham Trent University
About the Author
Mark Stoyle is Professor of Early Modern History at the University of Southampton. He is the author of 'Loyalty and Locality: Popular Allegiance in Devon during the English Civil War' University of Exeter Press, 1994), 'From Deliverance to Destruction: Rebellion and Civil War in an English City' (UEP, 1996), 'West Britons: Cornish Identities and the Early Modern British State' (UEP, 2002) and 'Circled with Stone: Exeters City Walls 1485-1660' (UEP, 2003).
Top Customer Reviews
PS on review upgraded to 5* Not a 4*dog!!!!
Rupert with Boy crossed to England to help his uncle fight against the Roundheads.Read more ›
This is a great book - well certainly for English Civil War obsessives such as I anyway.
Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta)
Rupert with Boy crossed to England to help his uncle fight against the Roundheads. He may have come to the service bearing a reputation as a witch or sorcerer, but any such stories would have been forgotten if it were not for the Roundhead pamphleteers, who hinted at "divelish" outrages, or referred to Rupert taking disguises in order to spy on the Roundheads, but said he had taken "severall shapes" in such disguises, hinting at the witch's capacity for shape-shifting. On their side, the Royalists were happy to portray the Roundheads as dunderheads who could believe the most foolish superstitions. They produced a famous pamphlet of 1643, _Observations upon Prince Rupert's White Dog Called Boy_, the text of which is included as an appendix in this book. Historians had first thought the pamphlet was a Roundhead diatribe against Boy's witchery, but Stoyle masterfully shows it to have been a Royalist satire on Puritan propaganda. Among other things, the pamphlet borrowed on the stock belief that a witch would have a "familiar," the devil himself or one of his subordinate imps in the form of a pet, to help the sorcery go along. _Observations_ may have been satire, but it was also the first pamphlet about witchcraft published in England in fifteen years. It would have achieved its purpose of making Royalists laugh at the foolish credulity of Roundheads, but it had a serious unintended consequence. Stoyle shows that the pamphlet, and others, created "an intellectual atmosphere in which the subject of witchcraft could be discussed more freely in print than it had been for many years before." The fanciful stories about Boy only supported the beliefs of the Roundheads that the king was really in league with genuine witches, and thus proved a propaganda masterstroke against the home team that had generated the stories in the first place. It may be that they did influence the first part of the war, increasing the vehemence and courage of the Roundheads; Rupert was not ultimately successful in his campaigns against them, and left England in 1646. More importantly, Stoyle shows, the newly-revived public thinking about witches may have lead the Roundheads to massacre the female Royalist camp-followers after the battle of Naseby. Even more significant, the increased attention paid to the familiars of witches because of Boy's reputation of being himself a familiar may have influenced the way the witch-finder Matthew Hopkins proceeded in his persecutions. No witches were executed in the king's quarters during the years covered in this book, but scores were executed after the Roundheads took over.
Boy himself was killed at the Battle of Marston Moor in 1644, but stories about him continued to reinforce ideas that Rupert was in league with the devil, as were the king and the rest of the Cavaliers. That the dog had absurd stories told about him proves to have been far from a frivolous matter, and a case could be made that Boy because of the reputation bestowed upon him was one of the most influential dogs in history. Stoyle seems to have investigated this surprisingly important sliver of history as deeply as can be done. While many of the connections he draws are tentative (and he admits it), Stoyle's picture is a dark and convincing look at a few monstrosities resulting from the sleep of reason.