Buy new:
£9.97£9.97
£9.40 delivery Thursday, 26 December
Dispatches from: Amazon Sold by: Amazon
Save with Used - Good
£4.99£4.99
£9.40 delivery Thursday, 26 December
Dispatches from: Amazon Sold by: Sell Books
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet or computer – no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Image Unavailable
Colour:
-
-
-
- To view this video download Flash Player
-
-
VIDEO -
Bad Science Paperback – 2 April 2009
Purchase options and add-ons
Ben Goldacre’s wise and witty bestseller, shortlisted for the Samuel Johnson Prize, lifts the lid on quack doctors, flaky statistics, scaremongering journalists and evil pharmaceutical corporations.
Since 2003 Dr Ben Goldacre has been exposing dodgy medical data in his popular Guardian column. In this eye-opening book he takes on the MMR hoax and misleading cosmetics ads, acupuncture and homeopathy, vitamins and mankind’s vexed relationship with all manner of ‘toxins’. Along the way, the self-confessed ‘Johnny Ball cum Witchfinder General’ performs a successful detox on a Barbie doll, sees his dead cat become a certified nutritionist and probes the supposed medical qualifications of ‘Dr’ Gillian McKeith.
Full spleen and satire, Ben Goldacre takes us on a hilarious, invigorating and ultimately alarming journey through the bad science we are fed daily by hacks and quacks.
- Print length382 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherHarper Perennial
- Publication date2 April 2009
- Dimensions2.54 x 12.7 x 19.56 cm
- ISBN-10000728487X
- ISBN-13978-0007284870
Frequently bought together

Customers who viewed this item also viewed
I Think You’ll Find It’s a Bit More Complicated Than ThatPaperback£10.09 deliveryGet it as soon as Thursday, Dec 26Only 9 left in stock.
Ben Goldacre Collection 2 Books Set (I Think You’ll Find It’s a Bit More Complicated Than That, Bad Science)Paperback£11.56 deliveryGet it as soon as Thursday, Dec 26Only 6 left in stock.
From the Publisher
Product description
Review
'His book aims to teach us better, in the hope that one day we write less nonsense.' Daily Telegraph (Book of the Year)
'For sheer savagery, the illusion-destroying, joyous attack on the self-regarding, know-nothing orthodoxies of the modern middle classes, "Bad Science" can not be beaten. You'll laugh your head off, then throw all those expensive health foods in the bin.'
Trevor Philips, Observer (Book of the Year)
'Unmissable! Laying about himself in a froth of entirely justified indignation, Goldacre slams the mountebanks and bullshitters who misuse science. Few escape: drug companies, self-styled nutritionists, deluded researchers and journalists all get thoroughly duffed up. It is enormously enjoyable.' The Times (Book of the Year)
'Thousands of books are enjoyable; many are enlightening; only a very few will ever rate as necessary to social health. This is one of them.' Independent
'It is an important book and if you were to pick up just one non-fiction book this year you'd do well to make it this one'
Benjamin Beasley-Murray, Daily Mail
'Goldacre's prose always reads well' TES
'Duck the health quacks with a brilliant new book that debunks medical nonsense.' Metro
'The book's light-hearted tone is a help to the reader nervous of science and statistics!This is a fundamentally good book.'
Druin Burch, TLS
'The most important book you'll read this year, and quite possibly the funniest.' Charlie Brooker
'One of the essential reads of the year so far.' New Scientist
'There aren't many out and out good eggs in British journalism but Ben Goldacre is one of them! Fight back. You could start by reading this book.'
Telegraph
'[A] hugely entertaining book!This isn't just an essential primer for anyone who has ever felt uneasy about news coverish of faddish scientific "breakthroughs", health scares and "studies have shown" stories -- it should be on the National Curriculum.'
Time Out
'A fine lesson in how to skewer the enemies of reason and the peddlers of cant and half-truths.'
Economist
'"Bad Science" introduces the basic scientific principles to help everyone to become an effective bullshit detector.'
Sir Iain Chalmers, Founder of the Cochrane Library
'This book reawakened my love of science.' BBC Focus (Peer Review)
'Read this book.' Sunday Business Post
'It is an important book and if you were to pick up just one non-fiction book this year, you'd do well to make it this one.' Daily Mail
About the Author
Ben Goldacre is a doctor, writer, broadcaster and academic who specialises in unpicking dodgy scientific claims from drug companies, newspapers, government reports, PR people and quacks. Bad Science reached Number One in the non-fiction charts, sold over 400,000 copies in the UK alone, and has been translated into 25 languages. He is 38 and lives in London.
Product details
- Publisher : Harper Perennial; Reprint edition (2 April 2009)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 382 pages
- ISBN-10 : 000728487X
- ISBN-13 : 978-0007284870
- Dimensions : 2.54 x 12.7 x 19.56 cm
- Best Sellers Rank: 17,780 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- Customer reviews:
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read book recommendations and more.
Products related to this item
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings, help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyses reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonCustomers say
Customers find the book informative, well-researched, and enlightening. They describe it as riveting, educational, and refreshingly honest. Readers also find the writing style engaging, simple, and clear. Additionally, they say the book is not preachy or ranty.
AI-generated from the text of customer reviews
Customers find the book informative, well-researched, and easy to read. They say it explains how scientists do research, interpret data, and how they make valid points. Readers also mention the book is tremendously important in exposing and debunking much of the pseudoscience. They appreciate the clear examples that explain tricky postulations.
"...because for the most part the author has done an admirable job of making science and the scientific method clear and understandable...." Read more
"...It also contains a handy chapter on how the media mangles statistics; although his own explanation of what a confidence interval tells us is a bit..." Read more
"...reporting in the media, proper analysis of claims and clear explanations of the statistics rather than headline percentages that most people don't..." Read more
"...It's an honest and eye-opening, often shocking account from someone who knows what they are talking about, based on facts and evidence not opinion..." Read more
Customers find the book great, riveting, and educational. They say it's refreshingly honest and satisfying. Readers also mention the book is worth every penny.
"This is a wonderful, angry, ranty book that educates and entertains, and ultimately leaves you sad that the world is the way it is, and wanting to..." Read more
"...Still, the book is very good, eye-opening and readable...." Read more
"A brilliant book - well-written, frequently very funny..." Read more
"...It's excellent and I can't wait to get my paws on it and read it from cover to cover, rather than peering over my other half's shoulder!..." Read more
Customers find the book entertaining, interesting, and refreshing. They mention it's a real page-turner, gently nudging the reader towards more progressive content. Readers also appreciate the author's witty style of writing and nice turn of phrase.
"This is a wonderful, angry, ranty book that educates and entertains, and ultimately leaves you sad that the world is the way it is, and wanting to..." Read more
"...(an exquisite skewering of homeopathy and an absolutely hilarious chapter on the Brain Gym that is so beloved by many head teachers and education..." Read more
"...It's an honest and eye-opening, often shocking account from someone who knows what they are talking about, based on facts and evidence not opinion..." Read more
"...Ben addresses what is normally a very "heavy" subject in an engaging and very funny way, which enables you to understand the issues he is..." Read more
Customers find the writing style very readable and engaging. They say the author uses wit, humor, and simple English to spell out some of the largest topics. Readers also mention the book is clear, comprehensive, and well-presented.
"...Still, the book is very good, eye-opening and readable...." Read more
"...Overall, this is a very readable book on a very serious topic and should be read widely." Read more
"...The book is written really well, very understandable even if you're not into science...." Read more
"...and randomization in clinical trials, for example - are not difficult to understand...." Read more
Customers find the book not preachy or ranty. They say it puts a lot of current nonsense into the scientific process. Readers also mention that the book is a good antidote to the media hype surrounding medical science. They appreciate the right level of sarcasm and disdain.
"This is a wonderful, angry, ranty book that educates and entertains, and ultimately leaves you sad that the world is the way it is, and wanting to..." Read more
"...This book is not preachy or ranty, it's not someone blowing off steam...." Read more
"...That said, the book is a bit repetitive in places, and a bit patronising. Mr Goldacre is also a bit too in love with Western medicine and scientists...." Read more
"...is the climax of the preceeding chapters and the quiet, understated rage against the media and the trendy lefty Notting Hill set epitomised by..." Read more
Customers find the book frightening, disturbing, and terrifying. They also say it's humorous, passionate, and light-hearted.
"...This book is funny, passionate, and eye-opening. The frauds perpetrated on the gullible by diet faddists, sellers of detox footbaths etc...." Read more
"If you are interested in reading a humerous, opinionated and informative overview of how scientific subjects are twisted, ignored, ridiculed and..." Read more
"...horizon broadening books and disturbing books I've ever read...." Read more
"I found this book to be quite scarry. We are all so easily misled...." Read more
Customers find the narrative style compelling and engaging.
"One of the few non fiction books that had me hooked. Has changed what I think of any announcements in the media about dramatic findings in studies...." Read more
"...is made interesting and important through Goldacre's engaging and narrative style...." Read more
"Best non-fiction work in decades. Dr Goldacre makes other popular science writers look unrigorous and slapdash...." Read more
"Great read, full of interesting stories as Ben Goldacre unveils all the truths of how bad science is portrayed in the real world...." Read more
Customers find the book has good value. They say it explains all the lies and fabricated science.
"...This book will save you money by explaining all the lies and fabricated science that companies glam up to make you feel that you simply must have..." Read more
"...No more money spent on nutritional pills for me! Many thanks Mr Goldacre." Read more
"...Great price as well!" Read more
"Book arrived very quickly with free delivery. Very good value. A quite outstanding book...." Read more
Reviews with images
Enjoyable and informative.
-
Top reviews
Top reviews from United Kingdom
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
I have read some good works on critical thinking and on science, and this book is right up there with the best of them. Ben Goldacre works in the NHS and the science he is talking about is unashamedly the science of healthcare - but the points he makes about understanding scientific reporting and spotting quackery applies in other fields too.
Indeed it was very refreshing to read a book attacking bad science, and defending reason that focussed on such real world and downright useful subjects as how to answer someone who thinks MMR jabs cause autism, or who thinks eating spinach will oxygenate your blood.
I thought I was usually reasonably good at spotting bad science, but putting the book down and picking up today's paper I was immediately struck by two stories I would normally have quicky forgotten, and was left suspecting that both are very inaccurately reported.
Bad science is all around us, and in this book you can sharpen your skills at spotting and refuting bad arguments. The only people who will hate this book are people who think that "there are more things in heaven and earth..." and thus we should never discount homeopathy (or crystals, or tarot or whatever) just in case they work by some mechanism we do not know.
(And the message of the book to those people is - fair enough. But there is simply no evidence that the *do* work at all).
The only down sides of this book are the writing style. It is open and amusing, but sometimes some people might feel it grating a little. I didn't - I liked it, but I would understand if others felt differently.
Moreover, there writing was sometimes a tad opaque. I found myself re-reading some paragraphs because the book was so chatty that sometimes the author repeated himself and at other times he seemd to assume his point was clear before he had quite finished writing it. It is a minor criticism, because for the most part the author has done an admirable job of making science and the scientific method clear and understandable.
One last criticism - had I been explaining the material in this book, I would have covered much sooner the issues of prabability and chance, and the point that even where there is no effect to be discovered, 1 in 20 experiments attempting to show the effect (or rather, to disprove there is no effect) will come up with positive results merely by chance.
He does mention this in a very good chapter on statistics. It is just that it was relevant earlier, and even when mentioned it is not a point he labours.
Again a very minor criticism for a very good, readable and enjoyable work that is thoroughly recommended.
This book never really gets to the heart of the matter although it does make a compelling case that the media, dominated as it is by the scientifically ignorant (Goldacre's 'humanities graduates'), plays a critical role, assisted by 'big pharma' and those in their pay, be they advertising execs or glory-hungry researchers. The journey he takes us on through the world of 'nutrition' is particularly fascinating: the drug companies own the vitamin companies and so profit on both 'sides' of the 'conventional' versus 'alternative' medicine battle.
Some of the author's assumptions i found problematic however, chiefly that he is determined to believe that everybody is capable of assessing the medical and statistical issues if these are explained to them properly. I'm not convinced about this, although i agree that our educational system fails us very badly in areas such as understanding risk. But even if it is true - or true for most people - it misses the point: the problem isn't what people could do, it's what they realistically have the time, motivation and resources to do. Most of us might be able to follow up references on PubMed. Do most of us have the time or motivation? Are we ever likely to have?
He also has a strong preference for blaming 'systems' rather than individuals. I sympathise with his desire not to personalise failings which are clearly not personal and also with the need to put people's individual actions in context, but blaming things on 'a system' comes perilously close to blaming things on 'a conspiracy'. Worse still, it can so easily lead to nothing being done because since none of us are the 'system', we tend not to feel personally responsible for it - or for changing it.
Still, the book is very good, eye-opening and readable. It also contains a handy chapter on how the media mangles statistics; although his own explanation of what a confidence interval tells us is a bit mangled, i seem to recall.
Top reviews from other countries
5.0 out of 5 stars I Laughed, I Learned, and Now I’m Suspicious of Every Vitamin Commercial
What I Loved:
The writing style is hilarious, but it never sacrifices clarity. Complex topics like placebo effects or dodgy data are explained very well that even someone like me who once googled “Is kale a carb?” can follow along. The author doesn’t just rant about quacks -- there are real-world examples, backed by science, of how some health fads are, frankly, absurd.
One of my favorite sections is about detox products. Spoiler alert: your liver is already a detox machine. That green juice you paid $12 for? It’s a glorified salad smoothie.
The takedowns of bad reporting in the media were also gold. I may or may not have yelled, "Yes! Thank you!" at certain points, startling my dog.
What Could Be Better:
If you’re sensitive about pseudoscience being called out, you might not enjoy this as much. It does go hard on certain topics -- but personally, I found that refreshing. Being Canadian, some parts of this book are pretty UK-centric, so the references to local regulations or media might not land as well if you're outside the UK.
Unexpected Perks:
I went in thinking this was just about debunking, but I came out better equipped to spot misleading claims. It's like a crash course in scientific literacy wrapped in humor. I also laughed so much that I’d call this a great stress reliever. It’s almost therapeutic.
Bottom Line:
If you’ve ever rolled your eyes at a celebrity-endorsed "miracle cure" or questioned why some research sounds too good to be true, this is for you. It’s sharp, funny, and surprisingly empowering. I now side-eye every wellness ad I see -- and my wallet thanks me for it.
Reviewed in Canada on 25 November 2024
What I Loved:
The writing style is hilarious, but it never sacrifices clarity. Complex topics like placebo effects or dodgy data are explained very well that even someone like me who once googled “Is kale a carb?” can follow along. The author doesn’t just rant about quacks -- there are real-world examples, backed by science, of how some health fads are, frankly, absurd.
One of my favorite sections is about detox products. Spoiler alert: your liver is already a detox machine. That green juice you paid $12 for? It’s a glorified salad smoothie.
The takedowns of bad reporting in the media were also gold. I may or may not have yelled, "Yes! Thank you!" at certain points, startling my dog.
What Could Be Better:
If you’re sensitive about pseudoscience being called out, you might not enjoy this as much. It does go hard on certain topics -- but personally, I found that refreshing. Being Canadian, some parts of this book are pretty UK-centric, so the references to local regulations or media might not land as well if you're outside the UK.
Unexpected Perks:
I went in thinking this was just about debunking, but I came out better equipped to spot misleading claims. It's like a crash course in scientific literacy wrapped in humor. I also laughed so much that I’d call this a great stress reliever. It’s almost therapeutic.
Bottom Line:
If you’ve ever rolled your eyes at a celebrity-endorsed "miracle cure" or questioned why some research sounds too good to be true, this is for you. It’s sharp, funny, and surprisingly empowering. I now side-eye every wellness ad I see -- and my wallet thanks me for it.
5.0 out of 5 stars great book. A must for all health professionals
5.0 out of 5 stars A must-read book for everyone!
5.0 out of 5 stars Je ne peux pas recommander assez
Il procède par types, couvrante des remèdes comme le homéopathie, ou, il lance un défis au fabricante de démontré en labo son efficacité. Il traite de fumisterie, en nous expliquant que les fabricantes devais l'attaquer en justice, mais cinq ans après toujours pas de dépôt de plainte. Pourquoi? Par ce que il faudrait démontre en labo que ça marche. Quelque chose qu’ il ne peut pas faire car il ne marche que en tant de placebo.
Puis, il nous monte la manipulation des statistiques, ses stats qui sont destiné aux docteurs aux hôpitaux et nous. Une fois finies avec ce chapitre vous ne regarderais pus jamais un stat pareil. EG. lidl nous dit dans son pub, meilleur chaînes de magasins 5 ans en succession. On prend cette info pour acquis car il est a la télé. Et, on se pose pas la question, voté par qui? Leurs employées?
Il parle des stats qui montre un efficacité des certaines médocs avec un tôt de efficacité hors normes. Il s’averre que ses stats sont vrai mais, ont étais réaliser avant 1980, le labo oublie ce détail et, bien sur depuis l’efficacité de ce produit a étais trouver d’être inefficace bien que toujours sur la marché.
On fais un tour en Afrique ou un charlot Allemande a provoquer la mort des milliers des gens qui ont étais convaincu par lui d’abandonner leurs traitement classique pour des traitement a base d’herbes qu’il vendait a prix fort.
L’individu a quand même dupé le gouvernent de l’Afrique de sud qui a l’autorisé son utilisation dans la traitement de cancer.
Il y a trop de sujets a couvrir, mais j’espère vous avoir mis l’ eau a la bouche.





