Bad News From Israel Paperback – 20 Jun 2004
- Choose from over 13,000 locations across the UK
- Prime members get unlimited deliveries at no additional cost
- Find your preferred location and add it to your address book
- Dispatch to this address when you check out
Frequently Bought Together
Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
The book does a very good job of summarising for the reader the complex historical background to present day Israel. It covers a lot of ground in a clear and readable manner and is particularly good at airing different views about the Arab-Israeli conflict. (Professor Avi Shlaim, University of Oxford)
A remarkable book, very comprehensive, with an innovative approach and full of interesting examples. It is convincing and very useful not only for researchers but for the general public as well. (Professor Lucrecia Escudero Chauvel, Universités de Lille III and Paris VIII)
Bad News from Israel reveals remarkable levels of ignorance about why things are as they are. What's more, the analysis offered here strongly suggests that the media are intimately linked to the perpetuation of this unhappy situation. (Professor Frank Webster, City University, London)
This superb study ... [blends] together material on what the media do, why they do it, and how their modes of reporting affect public knowledge and interest. (Professor Edward S. Herman, University of Pennsylvannia)
Coverage of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is often dangerously superficial. Bad News from Israel is a strong contribution to scholarship and public debate. (Professor John D.H. Downing, Southern Illinois University)
This volume is a must-read for those journalists and media critics who are tired of the same old debates about objectivity, and wish to move onto more sophisticated questions about how media bias actually works to alter public perceptions of important issues. (The Republic)
Philo and Berry have torn away the veil that has long obscured fair and objective reporting of the region. (Vertigo)
... superb ... Like all the Glasgow University Media Group's work, this is scholarship of the highest standard: it makes an invaluable contribution to our understanding of the conflict (Will Podmore)
About the Author
Greg Philo is Professor at Glasgow University, and is a member of the Glasgow Media Group. He is the author with David Miller of Market Killing (2000) and with Mike Berry of Bad News from Israel (Pluto Press, 2004).
Top Customer Reviews
Philo DOESN'T claim that reporters and news organisations are deliberately biased, but that a lack of historical perspective causes confusion. A huge majority of the British public thought that the 'settlers' were Palestinian, and that the 'occupied territories' were Israeli land being occupied by Palestinians. They thought that the Israeli-Palestinian conflict was just another border conflict - they didn't realise that a people had been dispossessed.
This loss of the origins of the conflict has interesting consequences. Palestinians were always seen as initiating violence, and Israelis as responding. Palestinian action was never understood as a 'response' to occupation and repression and loss of land. People assume suicide bombs are the result of 'mad-men', rather than emerging from a particular set of social conditions.
Reporters' subconscious use of words like 'hit-back', 'retaliate', 'pay-back time' were only used in terms of the Israeli action; while 'atrocity', 'murder' and 'cold-blood' were only used to refer to Palestinian action. This use of words tacitly endorses Israeli action while condemning Palestinian action. Can you imagine a suicide bomb being described in a news report as 'Palestinians hit back for 35 years of occupation? Or an Israeli raid into a refugee camp being described as 'cold-blooded killing'?
This different semantic treatment for the Palestinians and Israelis produced some odd results.Read more ›
The book is divided into three parts. The first section is an historical overview of the Israel-Palestine conflict. It is a very well written and researched general overview of the history of the region; ideally, one would hope that the news coverage should make an audience aware of this history. The discussion of the history of the region sets the stage for the second section of the book, a "content analysis" of news coverage. Here the authors document general patterns arising in the coverage of the Israel-Palestine conflict. The authors have taken a large body of news media output, mostly British TV news, and sought to classify broad patterns of exhibited bias.Read more ›
Greg Philo's well-researched and eloquent study reveals that for decades we have been denied the truth and that a deeply flawed perspective on the conflict has been provided.
The justice of the Palestinian cause has been denied a proper explanation; the war-crimes of the Israeli occupiers have been concealed and the sufferings of the poor and the oppressed have not been reported accurately, if at all.
I urge all those interested in learning the truth about Palestine and in confronting the bias of the media to read this book.
In a remarkable and scientific study of the manner in which the main UK terrestrial news broadcasters (BBC and ITV) cover the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, Professor Greg Philo and Dr Mike Berry of the Glasgow University Media Group, have detailed how that news coverage almost always tends to promote the Israeli perspective while ensuring that viewers remain ignorant of the actual causes that lie behind that long-running tragedy.
To compile their data, the authors brought journalists, academics and ordinary viewers together to study the influence of news on public understanding. More than 800 people were interviewed and researchers examined around 200 news bulletins.
According to the authors, television news is the main source of information on the Israel-Palestine conflict for about 80% of the population. Their research found that on British television, particularly on BBC1, there was a preponderence of official 'Israeli perspectives'. Israelis were interviewed or reported more than twice as much as Palestinians. There were also a large number of statements broadcast from US politicians who tended to strongly support Israel. These in turn were interviewed twice as much as politicians from Britain, with the strange result being that many British viewers will perhaps know more about the US position in the Middle East than their own government's position.
The most important of omissions the authors found was the almost total lack of context and history in the reporting.Read more ›
Most Recent Customer Reviews
I agree with the comments that argue that the authors have an overall sympathy towards the Palestinian narrative of the conflict, and that the book attempts to justify this bias by... Read morePublished on 10 Oct. 2011 by Liri
The author's attempts to demonstrate that the BBC is pro-Israel is fatally flawed. The sort of bean-counting methodology he relies on has been discredited. Read morePublished on 26 May 2011 by Amazon Customer
This is a well-written and well researched work. Like 99% of books on this conflict it appears to have arrived at its conclusions independently of its research - i.e. Read morePublished on 29 Jun. 2010 by A. Ham
This is one of my favourite books, not only because it helped my through under- and post-graduate academia, but also because of its rarity value as an academic book that is... Read morePublished on 6 Mar. 2008 by Clive Bixby
I am a social scientist used to reading studies which use many of the methods applied here to study the impact of BBC news stories on the understandings and perceptions of the... Read morePublished on 27 Feb. 2005 by Dr Adam Cooper
Anyone denouncing this book simply has not read it.
This gives a clear, truthful and shocking view of a world we honestly and regretfully know nothing about- read it. Read more
This superb book studies 189 BBC and ITV news bulletins on the Palestine/Israel conflict, in September-October 2000, October-December 2001, March 2002 and April 2002. Read morePublished on 14 Aug. 2004 by William Podmore
This book will not tell you all there is to know about the historical basis of the Arab-Israeli Conflict, but is an excellent portrayal of how influential the media has been in the... Read morePublished on 24 July 2004
Look for similar items by category
- Books > Business, Finance & Law > Biographies & Histories > Business & Economic History
- Books > History > Countries & Regions > Asia > Middle East
- Books > History > World History
- Books > Reference > Writing > Journalism
- Books > Society, Politics & Philosophy > Government & Politics > Countries & Regions > Europe
- Books > Society, Politics & Philosophy > Government & Politics > Countries & Regions > Middle East
- Books > Society, Politics & Philosophy > Social Sciences > Communication Studies > Media & Communication Industries > Press & Journalism
- Books > Society, Politics & Philosophy > Social Sciences > Communication Studies > Media Studies